Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 31;2013(7):CD006798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006798.pub4

Comparison 2. Sensitivity analysis.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Quality of life (imputed data removed) 3 259 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.19 [‐0.44, 0.05]
2 Pain (imputed data removed) 1 28 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.90 [‐1.09, 2.89]
3 Time to return to activity (imputed data removed) 1 86 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.20 [‐3.21, 2.81]
4 Number of hospital readmissions (imputed data removed) 5   Rate Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) 1.25 [0.43, 3.63]
5 Number of people requiring hospital readmission (best‐best) 3 336 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.30, 3.32]
6 Number of people requiring hospital readmission (worst‐worst) 3 336 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.68 [1.03, 2.73]
7 Number of people requiring hospital readmission (worst‐best) 3 336 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 4.52 [1.75, 11.70]
8 Number of people requiring hospital readmission (best‐worst) 3 336 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.29 [0.11, 0.82]
9 Failed discharge (best‐best) 5 451 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.61, 1.33]
10 Failed discharge (worst‐worst) 5 451 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.09 [0.79, 1.51]
11 Failed discharge (best‐worst) 5 451 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.52, 1.07]
12 Failed discharge (worst‐best) 5 451 Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.25 [0.87, 1.81]