Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 3;6:100218. doi: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2024.100218

Table 4.

Classification accuracy scores of validated classification based on the size and shape of wing cell contours of Tabanus megalops, Tabanus rubidus, and Tabanus striatus.

Species Size
Shape
Assigned/Observed Accuracy (%) Assigned/Observed Accuracy (%)
Discal cell
T. megalops 47/50 94 37/50 74
T. rubidus 48/50 96 42/50 84
T. striatus 2/50 4 40/50 80
Total
97/150
64.67
119/150
79.33
First submarginal cell
T. megalops 27/50 54 43/50 86
T. rubidus 46/50 92 46/50 92
T. striatus 25/50 50 41/50 82
Total
98/150
65.33
130/150
86.67
Second submarginal cell
T. megalops 29/50 58 43/50 86
T. rubidus 45/50 90 49/50 98
T. striatus 29/50 58 36/50 72
Total 103/150 68.67 128/150 85.33