| 1 Timed Up & Go Test (s): lower values indicate better balance ability |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 2 Single leg stance time eyes open (s): higher values indicate better balance ability |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 3 Single leg stance time eyes open (s) change score: higher value indicates better balance |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 4 Single leg stance time eyes closed (s): higher values indicate better balance ability |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 5 Gait speed: higher values indicate better balance ability |
3 |
|
Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) |
Subtotals only |
| 5.1 Immediately post intervention |
3 |
136 |
Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) |
0.39 [‐0.28, 1.06] |
| 5.2 Follow‐up at 3 months post intervention |
1 |
48 |
Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) |
0.10 [‐0.48, 0.68] |
| 6 Berg Balance Scale (score out of 56) higher values indicate better balance ability |
2 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Subtotals only |
| 6.1 Immediately post intervention |
2 |
250 |
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
1.06 [0.37, 1.76] |
| 6.2 Follow up at 9 months post intervention |
1 |
202 |
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.20 [‐1.21, 1.61] |
| 7 Functional Reach Test change scores (cm): higher values indicate better balance ability |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 8 Omnidirectional tilt board post‐pre change scores (s): higher values indicate better balance ability |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 8.1 Immediately post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 8.2 Follow‐up @ 3 months post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 9 AP stability during stance on a mat eyes open (mm) lower values indicate better balance |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 10 Reaction time (ms) low values indicate better balance |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 11 Physical performance score: higher score indicates better balance |
2 |
189 |
Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
‐0.06 [‐0.34, 0.23] |
| 12 Narrow balance beam post‐pre change scores (m/s): higher values indicate better balance ability |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 12.1 Immediately post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 12.2 Follow‐up at 3 months post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 13 Wide balance beam post‐pre change scores (m/s): lower values indicate better balance ability |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 13.1 Immediately post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 13.2 Follow‐up at 3 months post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 14 A‐P displacement during obstacle course (cm): higher scores indicate better balance |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 15 Leaning balance (mm) higher values indicate better balance |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 16 SOT: higher values indicate better balance |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 16.1 Eyes open |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 16.2 Eyes closed |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 17 M‐L displacement during obstacle course (cm): higher scores indicate better balance |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 18 Base of support (cm2) higher values indicate better balance |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 19 Angular radius narrow stance eyes closed post‐pre change scores (mm): lower values indicate better balance |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 19.1 Immediately post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 19.2 Follow‐up at 3 months post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 20 AP stability during stance (quiet and dynamic) eyes open: lower values indicate better balance ability |
3 |
|
Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Subtotals only |
| 20.1 Immediately post intervention |
3 |
614 |
Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
‐0.08 [‐0.23, 0.08] |
| 20.2 Follow‐up at 3 months post intervention |
1 |
48 |
Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.17 [‐0.40, 0.75] |
| 20.3 Follow‐up at 4 months post intervention |
1 |
35 |
Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
‐0.15 [‐0.82, 0.52] |
| 21 Mediolateral stability during stance (quiet and dynamic) eyes open: lower values indicate better balance |
2 |
|
Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Subtotals only |
| 21.1 Immediately post intervention |
2 |
565 |
Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.02 [‐0.15, 0.18] |
| 21.2 Follow‐up at 4 months post intervention |
1 |
38 |
Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.30 [‐0.34, 0.94] |
| 22 AP stability during quiet stance eyes closed: lower values indicate better balance ability |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 22.1 Immediately post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 22.2 Follow up at 4 months post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 23 Mediolateral stability during quiet stance eyes closed: lower values indicate better balance ability |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 23.1 Immediately post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 23.2 Follow up at 4 months post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 24 Area during narrow stance eyes closed post‐pre change scores (mm2/s): lower values indicate better balance |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 24.1 Immediately post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 24.2 Follow‐up at 3 months post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 25 Area during narrow stance eyes open post‐pre change scores (mm2/s): lower values indicate better balance |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 25.1 Immediately post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 25.2 Follow‐up at 3 months post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 26 Angular radius narrow stance eyes open post‐pre change scores (mm): lower values indicate better balance |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
Totals not selected |
| 26.1 Immediately post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
| 26.2 Follow‐up at 3 months post intervention |
1 |
|
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
