Comparison 5. General physical activity (cycling) versus control.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Self paced gait velocity post‐pre change scores (m/min): higher values indicate better balance ability	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
1.1 Immediately post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 Follow‐up at 3 months post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Narrow balance beam post‐pre change scores (m/s): higher values indicate better balance ability	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
2.1 Immediately post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 Follow‐up at 3 months post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Wide balance beam post‐pre change scores (m/s): higher values indicate better balance ability	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
3.1 Immediately post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.2 Follow‐up at 3 months post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 Angular radius narrow stance eyes closed post‐pre change scores (mm): lower values indicate better balance	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
4.1 Immediately post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4.2 Follow‐up at 3 months post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5 AP tilt board post‐pre change score (s): higher values indicate better balance ability	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
5.1 Immediately post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5.2 Follow‐up at 3 months post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
6 Omnidirectional tilt board post‐pre change scores (s): higher values indicate better balance ability	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
6.1 Immediately post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
6.2 Follow‐up at 3 months post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7 Angular radius narrow stance eyes open post‐pre change scores (mm): lower values indicate better balance	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
7.1 Immediately post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7.2 Follow‐up at 3 months post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
8 Area narrow stance eyes closed post‐pre change scores (mm2/s): lower values indicate better balance	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
8.1 Immediately post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
8.2 Follow‐up at 3 months post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
9 Area during narrow stance eyes open post‐pre change scores (mm2/s): lower values indicate better balance	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
9.1 Immediately post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
9.2 Follow‐up at 3 months post intervention	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]