Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD004963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004963.pub3

Campbell 1997.

Methods Type of study: RCT
Participants Number of participants randomised:233 (116 exercise group, 117 control)
Losses: 1 in control, 7 in exercise group at 6/12
N = 233 
 Age: mean 84.1 
 Sex: women
Health status as defined by authors: healthy, 
 Residential status of participants: community dwelling
Setting: New Zealand 
 Inclusion: women aged 80 years and over, able to move around own home, not receiving physiotherapy 
 Exclusion:<7/10 on mental status questionnaire
Interventions EXERCISE GROUP (MULTIPLE) (N=116): moderate intensity strengthening exercises including ankle cuff weights for lower limb, tandem and parallel standing, sitting and standing. 
 CONTROL GROUP (N=117): social visits 4 times in 2 months 
 Duration and intensity: 30 mins 3 times per week for 6 months 
 Supervisor: exercise group, physiotherapist; control group, nurse 
 Supervision: home visits 4 times over 2 months then self supervision 
 Setting:home
Outcomes FRT (cm)
4 test balance scale
time to walk 8 feet (s)
Compliance/Adherence: not reported
Adverse events: not reported
Notes Data not fully reported: attempted to contact author for clarification
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer generated random numbers
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Allocation by telephone contact
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Losses reported but not clear how these were addressed in analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Outcomes of interest not fully reported
Other bias Low risk The study appears to be free of other sources of bias
Blinding (participant) High risk Not possible
Blinding (assessor) Low risk Assessor blind to group allocation
Were the treatment and control group comparable at entry? High risk Differences in total number of medications and history of knee arthritis
Was the surveillance active, and of clinically appropriate duration (i.e. at least 3 months post intervention)? Low risk Immediately post intervention (6 months) and 1 year