Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD004963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004963.pub3

McMurdo 1993.

Methods Type of study: Cluster RCT (exercise = 2 clusters, reminiscence therapy = 2 clusters)
Participants Number of participants randomised: 49 
 Losses: 5 from exercise group and 3 from control group
N = 49 
 Age: mean 81 (range 64 to 91) years. 
 Sex: 33 females, 8 males.
Health status defined by authors: frail
Resisdential status of participants: old peoples home 
 Setting: UK 
 Inclusion: in residential care 
 Exclusion: residents with severe communication difficulties.
Interventions EXERCISE GROUP (MULTIPLE): (n = 20) All exercises were performed seated. Warm‐up, exercises designed to put joints in upper and lower limbs through their full range of movements. As the study progressed participants were encouraged to sustain muscle contractions for longer and increase number of repetitions. 
 CONTROL GROUP: (n = 24) attended reminiscence sessions 
 Duration and intensity: exercise group ‐ 45 minutes twice weekly for six months, control group ‐ for 45 minutes twice weekly for 6 months. 
 Supervisor: not stated. 
 Supervision: group 
 Setting: residential home
Outcomes Postural sway ‐ eyes open and eyes closed (Wrights ataxiameter)
Compliance/adherence: mean 91% exercise sessions
Adverse events: not reported
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomised homes by sealed envelopes based on computer generated numbers, participants allocated in blocks of 4 by gender and age (70‐79 and 80+)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear, insufficient reporting to permit judgement
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Withdrawals described, analysis not possible
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Inadequate description of all measures
Other bias High risk Failure to adjust for clustering
Blinding (participant) High risk Not possible
Blinding (assessor) High risk Assessors not blinded.
Were the treatment and control group comparable at entry? Low risk No differences reported on baseline characteristics with a potential to influence the effect of the intervention
Was the surveillance active, and of clinically appropriate duration (i.e. at least 3 months post intervention)? High risk Only immediately post intervention data, no follow‐up data reported