Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD004963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004963.pub3

Toraman 2004.

Methods Type of study: RCT
Participants Number of participants randomised: 42
Losses:no losses
N = 42 
 Age: 60 to 86; EX: 72.5 (7.4), CO: 72.3 (6.0) 
 Sex: 18 men; 3F ‐ Control and 17M; 4 women ‐ Exercise
Health status as defined by authors: healthy 
 Residential status of participants:residential care
Setting: Turkey 
 Inclusion: aged 60 or over; live in retirement home; independent; perform ADL without mobility aids; healthy; MMSE score of 20 or greater; volunteered for study 
 Exclusion: serious cardiovascular or musculoskeletal diseases
Interventions EXERCISE GROUP (MULTIPLE): 9 week multi component comprehensive training programme included a warm‐up 10 mins and cool down 10 mins. Components were: 1. aerobic (50% HR increasing 5% weekly) 2. Strength ‐ circuits ‐ 80%IRM and 3. Flexibility training 
 CONTROL GROUP: 
 Duration and intensity: 3 sessions per week for 9 weeks 
 Supervisor: exercise instructor and daily monitoring by nurses of activity levels 
 Supervision: in groups 
 Setting: residential home
Outcomes TUG over 8 feet (s)
Compliance/adherence:all 21 completed though only 6 participated regularly. Others not regularly.
Adverse events: No adverse events reported.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient reporting of attrition/exclusions to permit judgement
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Other bias Low risk The study appears to be free of other sources of bias
Blinding (participant) High risk Not possible
Blinding (assessor) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Were the treatment and control group comparable at entry? Low risk No differences reported on baseline characteristics with a potential to influence the effect of the intervention
Was the surveillance active, and of clinically appropriate duration (i.e. at least 3 months post intervention)? High risk Only immediately post intervention data, no follow‐up data reported.