Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 5;10(19):e38856. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38856

Table 3.

ANOVA results for the response surface quadratic model for optimization of extraction parameters.

Source df Hyoscyamine
Scopolamine
Mean Square F-value p-value Mean Square F-value p-value
Model 9 745.24a 10.11 0.0006 2331.12a 10.63 0.0005
A-Methanol 1 2615.58a 35.47 0.0001 9980.11a 45.50 <0.0001
B-Temperature 1 397.87a 5.40 0.0426 4035.68a 18.40 0.0016
C-Ultrasonication time 1 96.44 ns 1.31 0.2794 4.93 ns 0.0225 0.8838
AB 1 408.37a 5.54 0.0404 1587.04a 7.24 0.0227
AC 1 1182.22a 16.03 0.0025 1938.84a 8.84 0.0140
BC 1 669.80a 9.08 0.0130 1601.04a 7.30 0.0222
A2 1 195.64 ns 2.65 0.1344 1183.05a 5.39 0.0426
B2 1 1248.45a 16.93 0.0021 273.99 ns 1.25 0.2898
C2 1 4.98 ns 0.0675 0.8003 13.09 ns 0.0597 0.8120
Residual 10 73.74 219.32
Lack of Fit 5 97.31 ns 1.94 0.2424 298.24 ns 2.12 0.2140
Pure Error 5 50.17 140.41
Cor Total
19

R2 0.9009 0.9054
CV (%) 20.42 15.88
a

indicates significant and ns indicates non-significant.