TABLE 2.

Relationships between the proportion and edge density of woodland patches, located within a 250 m radius around the study sites, and the numbers of the eight most abundant wild bee taxa in both study years (2018 and 2019).

Wild bee taxon	Predictors	Estimate	SE	z‐value	p‐value
Andrena spp.	Intercept	3.166	0.114	27.682	<.001
	Proportion	−0.013	0.006	−1.954	.051
	Edge density	−0.001	0.001	−0.966	.334
Bombus hortorum	Intercept	2.012	0.318	6.319	<.001
	Proportion	0.018	0.013	1.427	.153
	Edge density	−0.002	0.003	−0.587	.557
Bombus humilis	Intercept	3.423	0.636	5.386	<.001
	Proportion	0.011	0.012	0.943	.346
	Edge density	0.003	0.003	1.122	.262
Bombus pascuorum	Intercept	2.222	0.283	7.853	<.001
	Proportion	0.043	0.007	5.795	<.001
	Edge density	−0.002	0.002	−1.258	.208
Bombus terrestris	Intercept	3.460	0.575	6.017	<.001
	Proportion	0.014	0.013	1.110	.267
	Edge density	0.001	0.003	0.253	.800
Bombus spp.	Intercept	2.329	0.384	6.062	<.001
	Proportion	0.009	0.011	0.849	.396
	Edge density	−0.001	0.002	−0.224	.823
Halictus spp.	Intercept	2.009	0.523	3.842	<.001
	Proportion	0.005	0.006	0.751	.453
	Edge density	0.001	0.001	0.641	.522
Lasioglossum spp.	Intercept	2.427	0.537	4.520	<.001
	Proportion	−0.014	0.004	−3.680	<.001
	Edge density	0.000	0.001	−0.049	.961

Note: These relationships were tested using generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) assuming a Poisson distribution and the study site and year as random effects. Significant p‐values are marked bold.