TABLE 3.

Relationships between the proportion and edge density of woodland patches, located within a 250 m radius around the study sites, and the numbers of the occupied brood cells of the seven Hymenopteran nest types in both study years (2018 and 2019).

Nest type	Predictors	Estimate	SE	z‐value	palue
Auplopus	Intercept	1.517	0.569	2.668	.008
	Proportion	−0.005	0.039	−0.133	.894
	Edge density	0.001	0.008	0.151	.880
Dipogon	Intercept	3.771	0.149	25.357	<.001
	Proportion	0.002	0.006	0.309	.758
	Edge density	0.000	0.001	0.119	.905
Eumeninae	Intercept	3.140	0.524	5.989	<.001
	Proportion	0.024	0.017	1.416	.157
	Edge density	0.009	0.004	2.440	.015
Hylaeus	Intercept	3.026	0.206	14.711	<.001
	Proportion	0.019	0.017	1.150	.250
	Edge density	0.005	0.003	1.448	.148
Megachile	Intercept	2.279	0.444	5.133	<.001
	Proportion	0.016	0.019	0.853	.394
	Edge density	−0.001	0.004	−0.235	.814
Osmia	Intercept	3.372	0.407	8.279	<.001
	Proportion	−0.009	0.008	−1.223	.221
	Edge density	0.000	0.002	−0.148	.883
Trypoxylon	Intercept	5.539	0.221	25.072	<.001
	Proportion	0.030	0.014	2.191	.029
	Edge density	0.000	0.003	0.120	.905

Note: These relationships were tested using generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) assuming a Poisson distribution, with the study site and year as random effects. Significant p‐values are marked bold.