Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 28;13(10):1748–1761. doi: 10.1002/psp4.13217

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Method comparison of type I error for bioequivalence tests of AUC, AUClast, C max, and all metrics combined (overall) in the ophthalmic product scenarios (top) and oral product scenarios (bottom). Type I error results within the 95% binomial proportion confidence interval (top and bottom dashed lines) are not statistically significantly different from the expected 5% (middle dashed line). Please note that not every method was examined in every scenario. The bootstrapped NCA method does not produce AUCinf. N represents the number of subjects and n represents the number of samples per subject and period in each scenario.