Skip to main content
mSystems logoLink to mSystems
. 2024 Aug 30;9(10):e00665-24. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00665-24

The role of gut microbiome and its metabolites in pancreatitis

Letian Pan 1,2,#, Nuoming Yin 1,2,#, Mingyu Duan 3,, Qixiang Mei 1,2,, Yue Zeng 1,2,
Editor: Guan-Hong Wang4
PMCID: PMC11494936  PMID: 39212377

ABSTRACT

Gut microbiome plays a vital role in the intestinal ecosystem and has close association with metabolites. Due to the development of metabolomics and microbiomics, recent studies have observed that alteration of either the gut microbiome or metabolites may have effects on the progression of pancreatitis. Several new treatments based on the gut microbiome or metabolites have been studied extensively in recent years. Gut microbes, such as Bifidobacterium, Akkermansia, and Lactobacillus, and metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids, bile acids, vitamin, hydrogen sulfide, and alcohol, have different effects on pancreatitis. Some preliminary studies about new intervention measures were based on the gut microbiome and metabolites such as diet, prebiotic, herbal medicine, and fecal microbiota transplantation. This review aims to summarize the recent advances about the gut microbiome, metabolites, and pancreatitis in order to determine the potential beneficial role of the gut microbiome and metabolites in pancreatitis.

KEYWORDS: gut microbiome, metabolites, pancreatitis, microbiome-based treatment, diet

INTRODUCTION

The pancreas is an important organ in the human body composed of acinar cells, duct cells, and islet cells (α cells, β cells, δ cells, and PP cells). The pancreas functionally consists of two parts: the exocrine pancreas containing acinar cells and ductal cells, and the endocrine pancreas including islets cells (1). Pancreatitis, triggered by injury to acinar cells and activation of trypsinogen, features inflammation, exudation, hemorrhage, necrosis, and fibrosis in the pancreas (2). Pancreatitis may develop into severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) that results in local complications and organ dysfunction (3). Uncontrolled pancreatitis, triggering consistent acinar cell and islet cell injury, may transform into pancreatic cancer or diabetes mellitus (4, 5).

Gut microbiome plays a vital role in the gut ecosystem, protecting the gut barrier and regulating host metabolism (6). Previous studies have discovered that the gut microbiome can make effects on the progression of pancreatitis (7). It is widely recognized that metabolites are strongly affected by the microbiome (8, 9). In recent years, metabolite–disease relationships are being brought into sharp focus profiting from the application of bioinformatics analysis. Nowadays, metabolites have been found to cause inflammation in obesity, Alzheimer’s disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), etc. Such relationships have also been demonstrated in pancreatic diseases (10). Therefore, there is a strong possibility that metabolites, which are closely linked with the microbiome, play an essential role in pancreatitis. In the past decades, studies on the gut microbiome, metabolites, and pancreatitis were limited. However, due to the booming development of metabolomics and microbiome in the field of pancreatitis, more and more studies have found links between the gut microbiome, metabolites, and pancreatitis in recent years. In this review, we will summarize how microbiome affects pancreatitis through the regulation of metabolites. Furthermore, we will discuss the mutual effects of metabolites and microbiome in pancreatitis. Finally, we will introduce the intervention measures that affect the gut microbiome and metabolites in pancreatitis.

GUT MICROBIOME AND ITS METABOLITES IN PANCREATITIS

Pancreatitis is mainly composed of acute pancreatitis (AP), chronic pancreatitis (CP), and other associated pancreatic diseases (11). In recent years, researchers have used metabolomics and microbiomics to examine the vital role of metabolites and the gut microbiome in the human body. The relationship between pancreatitis, metabolites, and microbiome has been demonstrated in recent studies (Fig. 1).

Fig 1.

Acute and chronic pancreatitis depict gut microbiome changes and metabolites. Acute involves Escherichia and butyrate affecting intestinal barrier and SIRT3 signaling. Chronic involves Bacteroidetes and SCFAs causing inflammation and biomarkers.

Relationship between the gut microbiome, metabolites, and pancreatitis. Changes in intestinal flora occur during the development of pancreatitis, resulting in changes in metabolites, which, in turn, have multiple effects on pancreatitis.

Acute pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis is a non-infectious inflammation of the pancreas with acute damage. Approximately 20% of AP converts into SAP because of intestinal barrier damage, microbiome translocation, and microbiota dysbiosis (12). Studies have shown that the structure of the gut microbiota was different between AP patients and healthy people. Opportunistic pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia–Shigella increased, and beneficial bacteria such as Bifidobacterium decreased in the progression of AP development (13). In the experiment of Tan et al. (14), there is an increase in pathogenic bacteria such as Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus, and a decrease in beneficial bacteria such as Bifidobacterium in AP patients compared to healthy individuals. Recently, it has been suggested that certain kinds of metabolites altered by the alteration of the microbiota act as protective factors in AP progression, such as butyrate, vitamin D, and nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) (1517).

Butyrate, the short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) with four carbon atoms, makes protective effects on AP from multiple aspects. In the SAP study related to Western diet, the supplement of butyrate significantly decreased the mortality (15). Several studies confirmed that butyrate reduced inflammatory cell infiltration and inflammatory factor expression in AP (1820). In this progression, nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) play an important role (21). Butyrate could significantly inhibit the mutual actions between HDAC and AP1 and STAT1, and then suppress the activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes (20). In addition, recent studies focused on the effects of butyrate on immune response. For instance, Foxp3+ regulatory T cells can be raised by butyrate during SAP. Besides the protective effects on the pancreas, butyrate could alleviate intestinal barrier damage in AP (18). Butyrate attenuates SAP through inflammation regulation, immune response regulation, and intestinal barrier protection, which makes it a promising research target.

Deficiency of vitamin D may predict SAP (17). Vitamin D is known to be associated with calcium metabolism. Hypercalcemia secondary to vitamin D deficiency could lead to pancreatic duct obstruction and pancreatic vasculitis, which increased the incidence of AP (22). Moreover, vitamin D has been found to play a vital role in the regulation of inflammation via vitamin D receptor (VDR) (23). What’s more, vitamin D can protect the intestinal barrier that is damaged during SAP (23). However, excess vitamin D has also been reported to aggravate AP (24). The toxicity of the serum vitamin D level threshold ranges from 50 to 150 ng/mL in different studies (22). In summary, vitamin D, as a common nutrient in daily life, is a promising research direction, especially for anti-inflammatory studies through VDR. The detailed mechanism of vitamin D’s regulation of inflammation in AP remains elusive.

Nicotinamide mononucleotide related to Prevotellaceae alleviates acute pancreatitis by activating pancreatic SIRT3 signal (16). Other metabolites, such as acetate, bile acids (BAs), polyamines, and so forth, are also reported to affect the progression of AP.

Chronic pancreatitis

Once acute pancreatitis is not treated in time, it may convert to CP (2). CP causes continuous pain and exocrine and endocrine pancreatic deficiency, resulting in lower quality of life (25). Furthermore, CP raises the risk of pancreatic cancer and diabetes mellitus (26). Previous studies have confirmed significant changes in the microbiota of CP (27). For example, in CP mice, there are more Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria and less Firmicutes compared with control mice (27).

Different metabolites produced by the microbiome may have different effects on CP. Endotoxin increased from controls to CP non-diabetics to CP diabetics, whereas Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Ruminococcus bromii declined (28). Part of alcohol-induced organ injury is related to microbiota dysbiosis. The small intestinal bacterial overgrowth caused by alcohol abuse may contribute to gut leakiness (29). Ciocan et al. (30) found that the abundances of several potential pathogenic microbes, such as Klebsiella, Enterococcus, and Pseudomonas, were higher in chronic alcoholic pancreatitis. In addition, other researchers found that soy bread diet could protect intestinal barrier and reduce inflammation in CP. This may be due to the gut microbiota, which fermented indigestible starches and complex sugars into SCFAs (31).

Besides, a prediction model based on blood plasma and serum metabolomics has been established to distinguish CP from non-pancreas diseases (32). Beta-carotene, cryptoxanthin, behenic acid, indole-3-acetic acid, ceramide, mannose, and N-acetyl cytidine were used as biomarkers in CP patients.

Autoimmune pancreatitis

Except for AP and CP, autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is also related to microbiome.

AIP is a type of special pancreatitis presenting with increased immunoglobulin levels and duct destruction (33). AIP is divided into two subtypes: type 1, common and associated with IgG4, and type 2, rare and not associated with IgG4 (34). AIP shows chronic fibro-inflammatory like CP, but it is reversible (35). Thus, no consensus has been reached on defining AIP as a subtype of CP yet (36).

Many bacteria are confirmed related to AIP. Kamata et al. (37) found that Klebsiella pneumoniae increased the severity of AIP by activating plasmacyte-like dendritic cells, which produce IFN-α and IL-33. The relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and autoimmune pancreatitis has been documented (38). Besides, Hamada et al. (39) examined the gut microbiota of AIP and found that some bacterial species, such as Streptococcus australis and Streptococcus gordonii, were less abundant in AIP.

According to previous research, microbiota mostly affect the progression of AIP via immune cells. However, whether microbial metabolites have effects on AIP or not remains to be studied.

MICROBIOME-ASSOCIATED METABOLITES IN PANCREATITIS

Metabolites are products and intermediates of cellular metabolism (40). Metabolites serve a multitude of functions in the progression of diseases, including energy conversion, microbiota regulation, signaling, and so on (40). Besides, metabolites are recognized as a critical bridge between the gut microbiome and the host (41). Commensal or pathogenic microbiota produce diverse kinds of metabolites to have effects on the host. Furthermore, microbiota can transfer the metabolism of host products to a variety of primary and secondary metabolites.

Microbiome mainly affects metabolites via biosynthesis, transformation, receptor regulation, and immune signaling (4244). The effects of metabolites are observed in diseases closely related to the gut microbiome such as IBD (45), NAFLD (46), obesity (47), and hepatic cancer (48). The relationship between microbiota and metabolites is usually found in these diseases. In pancreatitis, microbiome and microbial metabolite have also been documented as important factors (49). We found that SCFAs, BAs, vitamins, and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) were relatively more strongly associated with different pancreatitis. Some related microbes are listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Relationship between the gut microbiome and metabolitesa

Metabolites Gut microbiome Physiological function References
Acetate Parabacteroide
Blautia
Alleviate AP
Recover the microbiota dysbiosis caused by alcohol
(50)
(13)
(51)
(52)
Propionate Akkermansia
Bacteroidetes
Firmicutes
A precursor of glucose synthesis in the liver
Inhibit apoptosis
Modulate Ca2+ channel
Inhibit the proliferation of tumors
Enhance glucose-stimulated insulin
Release and keep β-cell mass
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
Butyrate Clostridium
Butyrivibrio
Lachnoclostridium
Eubacterium
Faecalibacterium
Eubacterium
Odoribacter
Splanchnicus
Alleviate colonic injury associated with AP
Regulate the inflammatory response by inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway
(58)
(20)
(59)
(60)
(61)
Bile acids Clostridium scindens
Muribaculum
Clostridium
Muribaculum
Bacteroides
Bifidobacterium
Actalibacter
Akkermansia
Induce cell death by impairing cellular Ca2+ signaling
Reduce pancreatic and intestinal injury
Overexpressed MUC4 expression
Inhibit the action of pancreatic cancer (PC) cells
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)
Vitamin A Regulate pancreatic development
β-Cell function
Pancreatic innate immune responses
Pancreatic stellate cell phenotypes
Enhance gut microbiota diversity
Enhance glucose-stimulated insulin secretion
Enhance β cell mass
(68)
(69)
Vitamin B12 Bifidobacterium
Actinobacteria
Fusobacterium
Lactobacillus
Suppress oxidative stress
Improve mitochondria dysfunction
Alleviate AP
(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
Vitamin D Lactobacillus Protect gut barrier
Anti-inflammatory
Affect innate immunology
Prevent pathological dedifferentiation of pancreatic β cells
Prevent SAP
(23)
(74)
(75)
(76)
(17)
Hydrogen sulfide Archaeoglobus
Desulfotomaculum
Thermodesulfovibrio
Deltaproteobacteria
Act as gaseous signaling molecule
Pro-inflammatory
Inhibit gut motility
Promote the inflammatory response caused by SAP
Exacerbate AP and CP
Activate autophagy excessively
(77)
(78)
(79)
(80)
(81)
(82)
Ethanol Bacteroides
Escherichia
Bifidobacterium
Clostridium
Aggravate CP
Accumulate fatty acid ethyl esters
Induce autophagy
Exacerbate fibroinflammatory in CP
Trigger microbiota dysbiosis
(83)
(84)
(85)
(29)
Indoles Escherichia coli
Vibrio cholerae
Peptostreptococcus
Lactobacillus reuteri
Protect intestinal barrier integrity
Regulate immune cell activity
Prevent postoperative pancreatitis
Activate AhR, which promotes tumor growth via inhibiting CD8+ T cells
(86)
(87)
(88)
(89)
(90)
Lactate Bifidobacterium Reduce pancreatic injury in AP
Suppress inflammation
(91)
(92)
a

“↑” means that the gut microbiome increases the metabolite or promotes its function, and “↓” means that the gut microbiome decreases the metabolite or suppresses its function.

Short-chain fatty acids

SCFAs refer to saturated fatty acids that have a carbon chain of no more than six atoms. They affect the host as a regulator of the gut metabolism, gut endocrine, proliferation, and differentiation, and the guard of the gut barrier (53). SCFAs are derived from dietary fibers. The digestion of dietary fibers needs some certain enzymes, which are only derived from gut microbes. These microbes degrade dietary fibers into SCFAs, gas, and organic acids (53). Acetate, propionate, and butyrate are the main components of SCFAs in the human body.

Acetate plays a vital role in pancreatitis and related pancreatic diseases. Acetate is a product of most gut microbes (53). Parabacteroide is found to produce acetate to regulate neutrophil infiltration to alleviate AP (50). Blautia, a widely known acetate producer (13), is found to alleviate AP via acetate (51). In cachexia patients of pancreatic cancer, the abundance of Proteobacteria and Veillonella increased, whereas acetate decreased (93). Besides, Martino et al. found that acetate could recover the microbiota dysbiosis caused by alcohol in the gut (52), which implied that acetate may be able to alleviate chronic alcohol pancreatitis.

Propionate has been found to have several important functions in the human body such as being a precursor of glucose synthesis in the liver, inhibiting apoptosis, inhibiting cell proliferation, and modulating Ca2+ channel via GPR42 (53, 54). Propionate is produced by succinate pathway or propanediol pathway (53). Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes produce propionate in the former way, whereas some bacteria, such as Akkermansia muciniphila, do so in the latter way (55). Propionate is found to inhibit the proliferation of tumors (56). Besides, propionate can improve β-cell function because it can enhance glucose-stimulated insulin release and keep β-cell mass via inhibiting apoptosis (57). More studies on the association between propionate and pancreatitis remain to be conducted.

Butyrate is a mediator of the immune response and microbiota regulation in the human body (94). It has been proven to be produced by Clostridium, Butyrivibrio, Lachnoclostridium, Eubacterium, and Faecalibacterium (58). Butyrate and its producers have been found to have a close link to AP. Butyrate was reported to alleviate gut injury associated with AP and inflammatory response in the pancreas via suppressing the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway (20). Clostridium butyricum, which produces butyrate, regulates the microbiome and alleviates the inflammation in AP through NLRP3 and MMP9 pathways (59, 60).

Bile acids

Bile acids consist of primary bile acids and secondary bile acids. Microbes are essential in the procession of BA transformation (95). In bile acid conversion, Clostridium scindens takes part in 7α-dehydroxylation, Muribaculum and Bacteroides take part in dihydroxylation, and six other microbes (Clostridium, Muribaculum, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Actalibacter, and Akkermansia) take part in oxidation (62). Microbes remove glycine or taurine conjugates to prevent bile acids from being reabsorbed from the small intestine (96). This procession is finished by the microbes with bile salt hydrolase (BSH). Macrogenomics research shows that BSH exists in all major bacteria and archaea in the human intestinal tract, such as Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, and Bacteroides (63). What’s more, intestinal bacterial overgrowth leads to abnormal bile acid decomposition and nutrient absorption (97). In addition to the classic function in digestion, BAs play as an inflammation regulator (98).

BAs are found to trigger the injury of pancreatic acinar cells through cellular Ca2+ signaling in AP (64). Receptors interacting with BAs in pancreatic acinar cells include Gpbar1, FXR, RyR, IP3Rs, and TRPV1 (98). The enhancement of Ca2+ ions induces mitochondrial membrane depolarization and activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K). BAs also damage pancreatic stella cells during pancreatitis. Sodium-dependent transport protein may play an important role in the effects of BAs on pancreatic stella cells. Studies on the effects of BAs on pancreatic stella cells remain elusive. In intervention research, BA supplementation could reduce pancreatic and gut damage. It is reported that Lactobacilli are the key bacteria here (65).

Vitamins

Vitamins are organic compounds that are essential for body growth and optimal nutrition, but they cannot be synthesized by the human body (99). Vitamin A, vitamin B12, and vitamin D have been reported to be more important than other vitamins in pancreatitis (72). Microbiome plays an important role in vitamin synthetization.

Vitamin A is ingested in the form of either retinyl esters or carotenoids, and transformed to active compounds such as all-trans-retinoic acid (100). Vitamin A is observed to affect organ development, β-cell function, innate immune responses, and stellate cell phenotypes in the pancreas via several mechanisms (68). Zhou et al.’s experiment found that mice fed with a vitamin A-deficient diet had lower gut microbiota diversity, lower glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, and lower β cell mass than those fed with a vitamin A-sufficient diet, and vitamin A could make up for the backwardness (69). Moreover, a higher gut microbiota diversity is related to a higher glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and β cell mass in this experiment. Thus, microbes are involved in vitamin A’s effects on blood glucose.

Vitamin B12, which is also called cobalamin, can only be synthesized by microbes (101). It is synthesized by certain bacteria and archaeon (102). Bifidobacterium, Actinobacteria, Fusobacterium, and Lactobacillus are found to be involved in the production of vitamin B12 (70, 71). Vitamin B12 can alleviate acute pancreatitis through the inhibition of oxidative stress and the enhancement of mitochondria dysfunction (72). In islet cell dysfunction mediated by nicotine, vitamin B12 alleviates the mitochondrial dysfunction caused by nicotine to alleviate the islet cell dysfunction (73).

Vitamin D, mainly produced by the skin, is a fat-soluble vitamin. Vitamin D makes biological effects through VDRs. In addition to calcium metabolism and bone homeostasis, vitamin D has been found to affect innate immunology (74). There is a positive relationship between VDR and anti-inflammatory (23). Deficiency of vitamin D is found to aggravate inflammation via NOD2/CARD15-defensin beta2 innate immune pathway (75). Microbes are found to affect the abundance of VDR. Pathogenic bacteria may reduce the amount of VDR (103). Lactobacillus has been observed to increase the amount of VDR (104). Meanwhile, a toll-like receptor is found to be a trigger of a vitamin D-mediated antimicrobial response (105). Vitamin D deficiency may predict SAP (17). This may be because vitamin D can protect the gut barrier, which plays an important role during AP (23). Furthermore, a VDR-targeted treatment to prevent pathological dedifferentiation of β cells under hyperglycemic stress was documented (76).

Hydrogen sulfide

H2S, once thought to be a toxic gas, is recently found as an endogenous regulatory factor with extensive physiological functions (106). H2S is mainly produced by sulfuric acid-reducing bacteria such as Archaeoglobus, Desulfotomaculum, Thermodesulfovibrio, and Deltaproteobacteria. Some sulfuric acid-reducing bacteria may produce SCFAs at the same time (107). In human colon and other tissues, H2S is synthesized from cysteine via cysteine γ-lyase (CSE) and cystathionine β-synthase (CBS). H2S biogenesis by cysteine metabolism is a critical biochemical output of the human gut microbiota (108). Seven cysteine-degrading enzymes were found in the genomes of Bacteroidesovatus and Enterococcus faecalis, which take part in inflammation (109).

H2S has been reported to regulate inflammation as a gas signaling molecule (78). It may be closely linked with pancreatitis. In acute pancreatitis, H2S inhibits gut motility and promotes inflammatory response in SAP (79). PI3K/Akt/Sp1 pathway is associated with the enzymes producing H2S such as CSE and CBS. The inhibition of the PI3K/Akt/Sp1 pathway could reduce the production of CSE and CBS. The pro-inflammatory effects of H2S may be induced through SP-NK-1R pathway (80). Meanwhile, the supplement of DL-propargylglycine, an inhibitor of CSE, significantly alleviated the inflammation in AP and reduced the substance P in the SP-NK-1R pathway. Furthermore, H2S could exacerbate AP by activation of autophagy excessively by AMPK/mTOR pathway (81). Except for AP, the elevated H2S level may be significantly associated with CP, but more information remains to be found (82).

Other metabolites

Other gut microbial metabolites, such as indoles, lactate, ketone, and ethanol, were found to be associated with certain kinds of pancreatitis. Their effects potentially work in different ways—exacerbating or alleviating, directly or indirectly.

Indoles are important gut bacterial metabolites mainly derived from aromatic amino acids. They can make impacts on the gut barrier and immune cell activity via aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and pregnane X receptor (PXR) (87, 88). Several species of bacteria have been shown by numerous studies to be capable of converting tryptophan to indole such as Escherichia coli, Vibrio cholerae, and Peptostreptococcus (86). Lactobacillus reuteri is a major producer of tryptophan and indoles, and can inhibit pro-inflammatory activity via stimulating AhR (110).

Lactate is derived from intestinal bacterial fermentation of carbohydrate. Lactate alleviates pancreatic damage in AP by inhibiting toll-like receptor and inflammasome-mediated inflammation (92). Bifidobacterium spp. are found to produce lactate to alleviate AP via inhibiting inflammatory responses (91).

Alcohol (ethanol) abuse is a dangerous factor of CP (111). In addition to ethanol deriving from alcohol, ethanol can be synthesized by gut bacteria such as Bacteroides fragilis, Escherichia, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, and Clostridium thermocellum (83). Ethanol aggravates CP through accumulation of fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEEs), which are the nonoxidative metabolites of ethanol, through induction of autophagy, and through interaction with other diseases (84). Impaired autophagy can increase susceptibility to endotoxin-induced chronic pancreatitis (112). Chronic excessive ethanol and FAEE exposure exacerbated fibro-inflammatory in CP (85). Besides, ethanol exacerbates CP via microbiota dysbiosis. Gut bacterial overgrowth caused by ethanol abuse relates to gut leakiness (29). Relative abundance of several potential pathogenic microbes, such as Klebsiella, Enterococcus, and Pseudomonas, is higher in chronic alcoholic pancreatitis (30).

INTERVENTION MEASURES BASED ON GUT MICROBIOTA AND ITS METABOLITES

Diet

All ingested food undergoes metabolic transformations and is converted into metabolites and other compounds within the gastrointestinal tract. In this progression, microbiota may take part in metabolite production. Thus, different diets may impact diseases by altering the microbiota and metabolites (Fig. 2).

Fig 2.

Illustration contrasts Mediterranean and Western diets. Mediterranean diet boosts beneficial bacteria and reduces pancreatitis risk. Western diet increases harmful bacteria, gut dysbiosis, inflammation, and pancreatitis risk.

Comparison between Mediterranean diet and Western diet in pancreatitis. Mediterranean diet and Western diet have different effects on the gut microbiome and metabolites, and each respectively either alleviates or aggravates pancreatitis.

The Western diet is well known for lacking dietary fibers and being high in fat. This diet type is found to change the structure of microbiota and causes metabolic inflammation so that it aggravates intestinal injury (113). In mice fed with Western diet, the mortality, systemic inflammation, and bacterial translocation in AP were increased (15). Besides, the diversity of their gut microbiota decreased, the abundance of E. coli increased, butyrate producers such as Lachnoobacter decreased, and butyrate decreased significantly.

The Mediterranean diet is full of plant food, which provides plentiful dietary fibers, as well as moderate dairy, fish, and olive oil (114). A study found that children with lower Mediterranean diet quality index (KIDMED) were easier to suffer AP (115). Besides, lower KIDMED is related to CP (116). This may be attributed to plentiful dietary fibers and vitamins in the Mediterranean diet. This diet has been shown to be associated with anti-inflammatory effects. The Mediterranean diet can mediate the gut microbiota. More beneficial bacteria, such as Lactobacilli, Bifidobacteria, Oscillospira, and Faecalibacterium, can be found in a healthier gut microbiota, along with more microbiome-derived beneficial metabolites such as SCFAs (117). The bacteria enhanced by Mediterranean diet can also take part in the metabolism of vitamin, tryptophan, and bile acids (118).

In recent years, soy diet has been found beneficial in CP. Soy bread diet could protect intestinal barrier and reduce inflammation in CP (31). Another study reports that soy diet reduces inflammation and disease severity in CP, which may be due to the reduction in myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), which reduce reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the pancreas microenvironment (119).

Prebiotics

Prebiotics refer to the food ingredients that cannot be digested but can be fermented by the gut microbiota in the diet (120). Chitosan oligosaccharides (COS) reduced pancreatic inflammatory infiltration and oxidative stress in SAP mice (121). COS improved the SAP-related microbiota dysbiosis, increased the probiotic Akkermansia, and reduced detrimental microbes such as Escherichia–Shigella and Enterococcus. Galactooligosaccharides (GOS) can significantly increase the number of fecal Bifidobacteria and improve intestinal barrier in SAP (122). Besides, fructo-oligosaccharides and polydextrose may protect intestinal barrier function in pancreatitis patients (123).

Herbal medicine

The active ingredient of some herbal medicine has been demonstrated to improve the gut microbiota by promoting commensal microbes and restraining detrimental microbes (124). The typical herbal medicinal used in pancreatitis included rhubarb anthraquinones, salvia miltiorrhizae, berberine, and resveratrol.

Studies found that rhubarb anthraquinones can protect damaged intestinal barrier in SAP (125). Anthraquinones are found to improve microbiota and increase the abundance of A. muciniphila (126). Salvia miltiorrhizae can alleviate multiple organ damage, promoting immune function and. thereby. improving the survival rate of SAP rats (127). Salvia miltiorrhizae has been found to regulate intestinal microbiota via regulating the abundance of bacteria (124). Berberine is able to alleviate pancreatitis via protecting damaged intestinal barrier (128). Berberine increases SCFAs and SCFA producers such as Blautia, Allobaculum, Butyricicoccus, and Phascolarctobacterium (129, 130). Resveratrol can treat AP via anti-inflammatory and antioxidant mechanisms (131). Resveratrol is found to enhance the abundance of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, and promote the catabolism of BAs (132). Moreover, bacteria may transform some medicines, such as Saikosaponin (133, 134) and Chinese yam polysaccharides (135), into their active ingredient.

Fecal microbiota transplantation

With the recognition of the pivotal role played by the gut microbiota in disease pathogenesis, researchers commenced exploring the novel approach of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for therapeutic intervention. In the past few years, the value of FMT has been seen in some diseases such as Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (136, 137). With regard to pancreatitis, some progress has been shown recently. FMT showed its ability to alter the microbiota and reverse the detrimental effects of harmful microbes in pancreatitis models (121). Normobiotic FMT was found to mitigate AP-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis and alleviate AP through ameliorating the mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and inflammation (16). NMN increased after FMT and stimulated SIRT3 signaling to alleviate AP. In CP, FMT also showed its potential in affecting pancreatic fibrotic progression via immune regulation (138). In short, FMT has a great potential in the treatment of pancreatitis.

CONCLUSION AND PROSPECT

Pancreatitis, featuring inflammation, exudation, hemorrhage, necrosis, and fibrosis in the pancreas, may develop into severe acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, and diabetes mellitus, which lead to lower quality of life and even death. Microbiome and its metabolites play an important part in pancreatitis and its related diseases. The reduction of microbiota diversity and the alteration of metabolite profile have been documented and are associated with pancreatitis. Acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, autoimmune pancreatitis, and associated pancreatic diseases, respectively, have relationships with different microbiome and metabolites, which may be a method to differentiate these diseases from others. Metabolites, such as SCFAs, BAs, vitamins, H2S, alcohol, and so on, have a close relationship with pancreatitis as a critical bridge between pancreatitis and microbiome. Many intervention measures, such as diet, prebiotic, herbal medicine, and FMT, exhibited their vital role as a modulator of gut microbiota and related metabolites (Fig. 3). However, the relationship between pancreatitis and microbial metabolites remains to be studied. In order to better understand the association between pancreatitis and microbiome, future studies might concentrate on how microbiome affects pancreatitis via its metabolites and what other substance may regulate this progression. Moreover, the biological mechanisms, such as fibrosis, inflammation, and cell immune and signal pathways, involved in the effects of microbiome–metabolite interaction on pancreatitis remain to be clarified.

Fig 3.

Illustration depicts diets, prebiotics, herbal medicine, and FMT influence microbiota, leading to metabolite production. Metabolites affect pancreatitis and related diseases by alleviating the condition through microbiota modulation and dysbiosis.

Overview of the relationship between the gut microbiota, metabolites, and pancreatitis as well as the new intervention measures related to the gut microbiota and metabolites. The gut microbiota affects metabolites and the progression of pancreatitis. Metabolites make different effects on the gut microbiota and pancreatitis. Pancreatitis can cause microbiota dysbiosis. Intervention measures, such as diets, prebiotic, herbal medicine, and FMT, can modulate the gut microbiota to alleviate pancreatitis.

As parts in the progression of pancreatitis, the gut microbiome, metabolites, and their modulation substances are potential targets to alleviate and even treat pancreatitis. For example, microbiome and metabolites may be excellent biomarkers to predict the progression of pancreatitis. FMT technology, based on the principle of regulating the flora to treat disease, has been flourishing in recent years, and as its good efficacy has been proven in many diseases, it may be used as a potential treatment for pancreatitis. Moreover, genetically modified bacteria, which can be applied to alter the component of gut metabolites, provide new technical support for the diversified ecological therapy of AP. However, the effects of treatments based on microbial metabolites are not yet clear. Thus, metabolomics studies, microbiomics studies, and clinical trials are essential to further explore the best therapy for pancreatitis, whether it be beneficial bacteria supplements, beneficial metabolite supplements, proper diet, prebiotics, or herbal medicine.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81970555 and 82270671) and the National Natural Science Foundation Youth Fund (No. 82200714).

Contributor Information

Mingyu Duan, Email: duanyu0708828@sina.com.

Qixiang Mei, Email: poise1236@126.com.

Yue Zeng, Email: carrie_1004@sjtu.edu.cn.

Guan-Hong Wang, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Marshall SM. 2020. The pancreas in health and in diabetes. Diabetologia 63:1962–1965. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05235-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Vege SS, Chari ST. 2022. Chronic pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 386:869–878. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1809396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC, Jensen ET, Kim HP, Egberg MD, Lund JL, Moon AM, Pate V, Barnes EL, Schlusser CL, Baron TH, Shaheen NJ, Sandler RS. 2022. Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the united states: update 2021. Gastroenterology 162:621–644. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Khan MAB, Hashim MJ, King JK, Govender RD, Mustafa H, Al Kaabi J. 2020. Epidemiology of type 2 diabetes - global burden of disease and forecasted trends. J Epidemiol Glob Health 10:107–111. doi: 10.2991/jegh.k.191028.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. McGuigan A, Kelly P, Turkington RC, Jones C, Coleman HG, McCain RS. 2018. Pancreatic cancer: a review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 24:4846–4861. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i43.4846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Adak A, Khan MR. 2019. An insight into gut microbiota and its functionalities. Cell Mol Life Sci 76:473–493. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2943-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Xu F, Yang C, Tang M, Wang M, Cheng Z, Chen D, Chen X, Liu K. 2022. The role of gut microbiota and genetic susceptibility in the pathogenesis of pancreatitis. Gut Liver 16:686–696. doi: 10.5009/gnl210362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Tremaroli V, Bäckhed F. 2012. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature New Biol 489:242–249. doi: 10.1038/nature11552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Krautkramer KA, Fan J, Bäckhed F. 2021. Gut microbial metabolites as multi-kingdom intermediates. Nat Rev Microbiol 19:77–94. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0438-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Yang X, Chen J, Wang J, Ma S, Feng W, Wu Z, Guo Y, Zhou H, Mi W, Chen W, Yin B, Lin Y. 2022. Very-low-density lipoprotein receptor-enhanced lipid metabolism in pancreatic stellate cells promotes pancreatic fibrosis. Immunity 55:1185–1199. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mayerle J, Sendler M, Hegyi E, Beyer G, Lerch MM, Sahin-Tóth M. 2019. Genetics, cell biology, and pathophysiology of pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 156:1951–1968. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Jing H, Chang Q, Xu Y, Wang J, Wu X, Huang J, Wang L, Zhang Z. 2022. Effect of aging on acute pancreatitis through gut microbiota. Front Microbiol 13:897992. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.897992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Zhu Y, He C, Li X, Cai Y, Hu J, Liao Y, Zhao J, Xia L, He W, Liu L, Luo C, Shu X, Cai Q, Chen Y, Lu N. 2019. Gut microbiota dysbiosis worsens the severity of acute pancreatitis in patients and mice. J Gastroenterol 54:347–358. doi: 10.1007/s00535-018-1529-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Tan C, Ling Z, Huang Y, Cao Y, Liu Q, Cai T, Yuan H, Liu C, Li Y, Xu K. 2015. Dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota associated with inflammation involved in the progression of acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 44:868–875. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. van den Berg FF, van Dalen D, Hyoju SK, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Wiersinga WJ, Zaborina O, Boermeester MA, Alverdy J. 2021. Western-type diet influences mortality from necrotising pancreatitis and demonstrates a central role for butyrate. Gut 70:915–927. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Liu L-W, Xie Y, Li G-Q, Zhang T, Sui Y-H, Zhao Z-J, Zhang Y-Y, Yang W-B, Geng X-L, Xue D-B, Chen H, Wang Y-W, Lu T-Q, Shang L-R, Li Z-B, Li L, Sun B. 2023. Gut microbiota-derived nicotinamide mononucleotide alleviates acute pancreatitis by activating pancreatic SIRT3 signalling. Br J Pharmacol 180:647–666. doi: 10.1111/bph.15980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Huh JH, Kim JW, Lee KJ. 2019. Vitamin D deficiency predicts severe acute pancreatitis. United European Gastroenterol J 7:90–95. doi: 10.1177/2050640618811489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Xiao S, Jing S, Jiakui S, Lei Z, Ying L, Han L, Xinwei M, Weiqin L. 2022. Butyrate ameliorates intestinal epithelial barrier injury via enhancing Foxp3+ Regulatory T-cell function in severe acute pancreatitis model. Turk J Gastroenterol 33:710–719. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2022.21307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Zhang T, Xia M, Zhan Q, Zhou Q, Lu G, An F. 2015. Sodium butyrate reduces organ injuries in mice with severe acute pancreatitis through inhibiting HMGB1 expression. Dig Dis Sci 60:1991–1999. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3586-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Pan X, Fang X, Wang F, Li H, Niu W, Liang W, Wu C, Li J, Tu X, Pan L-L, Sun J. 2019. Butyrate ameliorates caerulein-induced acute pancreatitis and associated intestinal injury by tissue-specific mechanisms. Br J Pharmacol 176:4446–4461. doi: 10.1111/bph.14806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Vinolo MAR, Rodrigues HG, Hatanaka E, Sato FT, Sampaio SC, Curi R. 2011. Suppressive effect of short-chain fatty acids on production of proinflammatory mediators by neutrophils. J Nutr Biochem 22:849–855. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2010.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Cai F, Hu C, Chen C-J, Han Y-P, Lin Z-Q, Deng L-H, Xia Q. 2022. Vitamin D and pancreatitis: a narrative review of current evidence. Nutrients 14:2113. doi: 10.3390/nu14102113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Liu W, Chen Y, Golan MA, Annunziata ML, Du J, Dougherty U, Kong J, Musch M, Huang Y, Pekow J, Zheng C, Bissonnette M, Hanauer SB, Li YC. 2013. Intestinal epithelial vitamin D receptor signaling inhibits experimental colitis. J Clin Invest 123:3983–3996. doi: 10.1172/JCI65842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Weissman S, Aziz M, Chandran J, Souferi B, Berry R, Elias S, Tabibian JH. 2021. Vitamin D–induced acute pancreatitis. Am J Ther. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Beyer G, Habtezion A, Werner J, Lerch MM, Mayerle J. 2020. Chronic pancreatitis. Lancet 396:499–512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31318-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Singh A, Aggarwal M, Garg R, Stevens T, Chahal P. 2022. Post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus: insight on optimal management with nutrition and lifestyle approaches. Ann Med 54:1776–1786. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2090601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Han M-M, Zhu X-Y, Peng Y-F, Lin H, Liu D-C, Li L. 2019. The alterations of gut microbiota in mice with chronic pancreatitis. Ann Transl Med 7:464. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.08.18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Jandhyala SM, Madhulika A, Deepika G, Rao GV, Reddy DN, Subramanyam C, Sasikala M, Talukdar R. 2017. Altered intestinal microbiota in patients with chronic pancreatitis: implications in diabetes and metabolic abnormalities. Sci Rep 7:43640. doi: 10.1038/srep43640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Li F, McClain CJ, Feng W. 2019. Microbiome dysbiosis and alcoholic liver disease. Liver Res 3:218–226. doi: 10.1016/j.livres.2019.09.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Ciocan D, Rebours V, Voican CS, Wrzosek L, Puchois V, Cassard A-M, Perlemuter G. 2018. Characterization of intestinal microbiota in alcoholic patients with and without alcoholic hepatitis or chronic alcoholic pancreatitis. Sci Rep 8:4822. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23146-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Ahn-Jarvis J, Lombardo E, Cruz-Monserrate Z, Badi N, Crowe O, Kaul S, Komar H, Krishna SG, Lesinski GB, Mace TA, Ramsey ML, Roberts K, Stinehart K, Traczek M, Conwell DL, Vodovotz Y, Hart PA. 2020. Reduction of inflammation in chronic pancreatitis using A soy bread intervention: a feasibility study. Pancreatology 20:852–859. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.04.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Adam MG, Beyer G, Christiansen N, Kamlage B, Pilarsky C, Distler M, Fahlbusch T, Chromik A, Klein F, Bahra M, Uhl W, Grützmann R, Mahajan UM, Weiss FU, Mayerle J, Lerch MM. 2021. Identification and validation of a multivariable prediction model based on blood plasma and serum metabolomics for the distinction of chronic pancreatitis subjects from non-pancreas disease control subjects. Gut 70:2150–2158. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Nagpal SJS, Sharma A, Chari ST. 2018. Autoimmune pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 113:1301. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0146-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Khandelwal A, Inoue D, Takahashi N. 2020. Autoimmune pancreatitis: an update. Abdom Radiol (NY) 45:1359–1370. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02275-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Shimosegawa T, Kataoka K, Kamisawa T, Miyakawa H, Ohara H, Ito T, Naruse S, Sata N, Suda K, Hirota M, Takeyama Y, Shiratori K, Hatori T, Otsuki M, Atomi Y, Sugano K, Tanaka M. 2010. The revised Japanese clinical diagnostic criteria for chronic pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol 45:584–591. doi: 10.1007/s00535-010-0242-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Omiyale AO. 2016. Autoimmune pancreatitis. Gland Surg 5:318–326. doi: 10.21037/gs.2015.11.02 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kamata K, Watanabe T, Minaga K, Hara A, Sekai I, Otsuka Y, Yoshikawa T, Park A-M, Kudo M. 2020. Gut microbiome alterations in type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis after induction of remission by prednisolone. Clin Exp Immunol 202:308–320. doi: 10.1111/cei.13509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Rieder G, Karnholz A, Stoeckelhuber M, Merchant JL, Haas R. 2007. H pylori infection causes chronic pancreatitis in mongolian gerbils. World J Gastroenterol 13:3939–3947. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i29.3939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Hamada S, Masamune A, Nabeshima T, Shimosegawa T. 2018. Differences in gut microbiota profiles between autoimmune pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis. Tohoku J Exp Med 244:113–117. doi: 10.1620/tjem.244.113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Sieckmann T, Kirschner KM. 2020. Polyamines, metabolites and metabolomics. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 229:e13480. doi: 10.1111/apha.13480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. McCarville JL, Chen GY, Cuevas VD, Troha K, Ayres JS. 2020. Microbiota metabolites in health and disease. Annu Rev Immunol 38:147–170. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-071219-125715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Wu J, Wang K, Wang X, Pang Y, Jiang C. 2021. The role of the gut microbiome and its metabolites in metabolic diseases. Protein Cell 12:360–373. doi: 10.1007/s13238-020-00814-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Visconti A, Le Roy CI, Rosa F, Rossi N, Martin TC, Mohney RP, Li W, de Rinaldis E, Bell JT, Venter JC, Nelson KE, Spector TD, Falchi M. 2019. Interplay between the human gut microbiome and host metabolism. Nat Commun 10:4505. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12476-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Vojinovic D, Radjabzadeh D, Kurilshikov A, Amin N, Wijmenga C, Franke L, Ikram MA, Uitterlinden AG, Zhernakova A, Fu J, Kraaij R, van Duijn CM. 2019. Relationship between gut microbiota and circulating metabolites in population-based cohorts. Nat Commun 10:5813. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13721-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Adolph TE, Meyer M, Schwärzler J, Mayr L, Grabherr F, Tilg H. 2022. The metabolic nature of inflammatory bowel diseases. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 19:753–767. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00658-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Tilg H, Adolph TE, Dudek M, Knolle P. 2021. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: the interplay between metabolism, microbes and immunity. Nat Metab 3:1596–1607. doi: 10.1038/s42255-021-00501-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Maruvada P, Leone V, Kaplan LM, Chang EB. 2017. The human microbiome and obesity: moving beyond associations. Cell Host Microbe 22:589–599. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Pfister D, Núñez NG, Pinyol R, Govaere O, Pinter M, Szydlowska M, Gupta R, Qiu M, Deczkowska A, Weiner A, et al. 2021. NASH limits anti-tumour surveillance in immunotherapy-treated HCC. Nat New Biol 592:450–456. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03362-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Thomas RM, Jobin C. 2020. Microbiota in pancreatic health and disease: the next frontier in microbiome research. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 17:53–64. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0242-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Lei Y, Tang L, Liu S, Hu S, Wu L, Liu Y, Yang M, Huang S, Tang X, Tang T, Zhao X, Vlodavsky I, Zeng S, Tang B, Yang S. 2021. Parabacteroides produces acetate to alleviate heparanase-exacerbated acute pancreatitis through reducing neutrophil infiltration. Microbiome 9:115. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01065-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Hu X, Gong L, Zhou R, Han Z, Ji L, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Wu D. 2021. Variations in gut microbiome are associated with prognosis of hypertriglyceridemia-associated acute pancreatitis. Biomolecules 11:695. doi: 10.3390/biom11050695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Martino C, Zaramela LS, Gao B, Embree M, Tarasova J, Parker SJ, Wang Y, Chu H, Chen P, Lee K-C, Galzerani DD, Gengatharan JM, Lekbua A, Neal M, Knight R, Tsukamoto H, Metallo CM, Schnabl B, Zengler K. 2022. Acetate reprograms gut microbiota during alcohol consumption. Nat Commun 13:4630. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31973-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Martin-Gallausiaux C, Marinelli L, Blottière HM, Larraufie P, Lapaque N. 2021. SCFA: mechanisms and functional importance in the gut. Proc Nutr Soc 80:37–49. doi: 10.1017/S0029665120006916 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Deng M, Li X, Li W, Gong J, Zhang X, Ge S, Zhao L. 2021. Short-chain fatty acids alleviate hepatocyte apoptosis induced by gut-derived protein-bound uremic toxins. Front Nutr 8:756730. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.756730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Belzer C, Chia LW, Aalvink S, Chamlagain B, Piironen V, Knol J, de Vos WM. 2017. Microbial metabolic networks at the mucus layer lead to diet-independent butyrate and vitamin B12 production by intestinal symbionts. mBio 8:e00770-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00770-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Al-Qadami GH, Secombe KR, Subramaniam CB, Wardill HR, Bowen JM. 2022. Gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids: impact on cancer treatment response and toxicities. Microorganisms 10:2048. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10102048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Pingitore A, Chambers ES, Hill T, Maldonado IR, Liu B, Bewick G, Morrison DJ, Preston T, Wallis GA, Tedford C, Castañera González R, Huang GC, Choudhary P, Frost G, Persaud SJ. 2017. The diet-derived short chain fatty acid propionate improves beta-cell function in humans and stimulates insulin secretion from human islets in vitro. Diabetes Obes Metab 19:257–265. doi: 10.1111/dom.12811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Flint HJ. 2016. Gut microbial metabolites in health and disease. Gut Microbes 7:187–188. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2016.1182295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Pan L, Niu W, Fang X, Liang W, Li H, Chen W, Zhang H, Bhatia M, Sun J. 2019. Clostridium butyricum strains suppress experimental acute pancreatitis by maintaining intestinal homeostasis. Mol Nutr Food Res 63. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201801419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Yan Q, Jia L, Wen B, Wu Y, Zeng Y, Wang Q. 2022. Clostridium butyricum protects against pancreatic and intestinal injury after severe acute pancreatitis via downregulation of MMP9. Front Pharmacol 13:919010. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.919010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Zhou W, Zhang D, Li Z, Jiang H, Li J, Ren R, Gao X, Li J, Wang X, Wang W, Yang Y. 2021. The fecal microbiota of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and autoimmune pancreatitis characterized by metagenomic sequencing. J Transl Med 19:215. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-02882-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Marion S, Desharnais L, Studer N, Dong Y, Notter MD, Poudel S, Menin L, Janowczyk A, Hettich RL, Hapfelmeier S, Bernier-Latmani R. 2020. Biogeography of microbial bile acid transformations along the murine gut. J Lipid Res 61:1450–1463. doi: 10.1194/jlr.RA120001021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Wahlström A, Sayin SI, Marschall H-U, Bäckhed F. 2016. Intestinal crosstalk between bile acids and microbiota and its impact on host metabolism. Cell Metab 24:41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Kim JY, Kim KH, Lee JA, Namkung W, Sun A-Q, Ananthanarayanan M, Suchy FJ, Shin DM, Muallem S, Lee MG. 2002. Transporter-mediated bile acid uptake causes Ca2+-dependent cell death in rat pancreatic acinar cells. Gastroenterology 122:1941–1953. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.33617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Wan Y-D, Zhu R-X, Pan X-T, Sun T-W. 2020. Bile acid supplementation improves murine pancreatitis in association with the gut microbiota. Front Physiol 11:650. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00650 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Joshi S, Cruz E, Rachagani S, Guha S, Brand RE, Ponnusamy MP, Kumar S, Batra SK. 2016. Bile acids-mediated overexpression of MUC4 via FAK-dependent c-Jun activation in pancreatic cancer. Mol Oncol 10:1063–1077. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2016.04.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Zhu S, Yang K, Yang S, Zhang L, Xiong M, Zhang J, Chen B. 2022. A high bile acid environment promotes apoptosis and inhibits migration in pancreatic cancer. Bioengineered 13:6719–6728. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2045823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Zhou Y, Wang H, Zhou J, Qiu S, Cai T, Li H, Shen Z, Hu Y, Ding B, Luo M, Huang R, Yan R, Xu W, He C, Zhang Y, Li F, Sun Z, Ma J. 2021. Vitamin A and its multi-effects on pancreas: recent advances and prospects. Front Endocrinol 12:620941. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.620941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Zhou Y, Zhou J, Zhang Y, Tang J, Sun B, Xu W, Wang X, Chen Y, Sun Z. 2020. Changes in intestinal microbiota are associated with islet function in A mouse model of dietary vitamin A deficiency. J Diabetes Res 2020:2354108. doi: 10.1155/2020/2354108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Guetterman HM, Huey SL, Knight R, Fox AM, Mehta S, Finkelstein JL. 2022. Vitamin B-12 and the gastrointestinal microbiome: a systematic review. Adv Nutr 13:530–558. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Yoshii K, Hosomi K, Sawane K, Kunisawa J. 2019. Metabolism of dietary and microbial vitamin B family in the regulation of host immunity. Front Nutr 6:48. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Yuan J, Wei Z, Xin G, Liu X, Zhou Z, Zhang Y, Yu X, Wan C, Chen Q, Zhao W, Wang X, Dong Y, Chen Z, Chen X, Niu H, Huang W. 2021. Vitamin B12 attenuates acute pancreatitis by suppressing oxidative stress and improving mitochondria dysfunction via CBS/SIRT1 pathway. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2021:7936316. doi: 10.1155/2021/7936316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Bhattacharjee A, Prasad SK, Banerjee O, Singh S, Banerjee A, Bose A, Pal S, Maji BK, Mukherjee S. 2018. Targeting mitochondria with folic acid and vitamin B12 ameliorates nicotine mediated islet cell dysfunction. Environ Toxicol 33:988–1000. doi: 10.1002/tox.22586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Saponaro F, Saba A, Zucchi R. 2020. An update on vitamin D metabolism. Int J Mol Sci 21:6573. doi: 10.3390/ijms21186573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Wang T-T, Dabbas B, Laperriere D, Bitton AJ, Soualhine H, Tavera-Mendoza LE, Dionne S, Servant MJ, Bitton A, Seidman EG, Mader S, Behr MA, White JH. 2010. Direct and indirect induction by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 of the NOD2/CARD15-defensin beta2 innate immune pathway defective in crohn disease. J Biol Chem 285:2227–2231. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C109.071225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Neelankal John A, Iqbal Z, Colley S, Morahan G, Makishima M, Jiang F-X. 2018. Vitamin D receptor-targeted treatment to prevent pathological dedifferentiation of pancreatic β cells under hyperglycaemic stress. Diabetes Metab 44:269–280. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2017.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Barton LL, Hamilton WA, Hamilton WA, Barton LL. 2007. Sulphate-reducing bacteria: environmental and engineered systems [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Okamoto M, Ishizaki T, Kimura T. 2015. Protective effect of hydrogen sulfide on pancreatic beta-cells. Nitric Oxide 46:32–36. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2014.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Liu Y, Liao R, Qiang Z, Zhang C. 2017. Pro-inflammatory cytokine-driven PI3K/Akt/Sp1 signalling and H2S production facilitates the pathogenesis of severe acute pancreatitis. Biosci Rep 37:BSR20160483. doi: 10.1042/BSR20160483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Bhatia M, Sidhapuriwala JN, Ng SW, Tamizhselvi R, Moochhala SM. 2008. Pro-inflammatory effects of hydrogen sulphide on substance P in caerulein-induced acute pancreatitis. J Cell Mol Med 12:580–590. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00131.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Ji L, Li L, Qu F, Zhang G, Wang Y, Bai X, Pan S, Xue D, Wang G, Sun B. 2016. Hydrogen sulphide exacerbates acute pancreatitis by over-activating autophagy via AMPK/mTOR pathway. J Cell Mol Med 20:2349–2361. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12928 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Zhang W, Wang ML, Cranford SW. 2016. Ranking of molecular biomarker interaction with targeted DNA nucleobases via full atomistic molecular dynamics. Sci Rep 6:18659. doi: 10.1038/srep18659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Dai X, Hou H, Zhang W, Liu T, Li Y, Wang S, Wang B, Cao H. 2020. Microbial metabolites: critical regulators in NAFLD. Front Microbiol 11:567654. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.567654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Rasineni K, Srinivasan MP, Balamurugan AN, Kaphalia BS, Wang S, Ding W-X, Pandol SJ, Lugea A, Simon L, Molina PE, Gao P, Casey CA, Osna NA, Kharbanda KK. 2020. Recent advances in understanding the complexity of alcohol-induced pancreatic dysfunction and pancreatitis development. Biomolecules 10:669. doi: 10.3390/biom10050669 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Srinivasan MP, Bhopale KK, Caracheo AA, Kaphalia L, Gong B, Popov VL, Boor PJ, Shakeel Ansari GA, Kaphalia BS. 2022. Exposure to binge ethanol and fatty acid ethyl esters exacerbates chronic ethanol-induced pancreatic injury in hepatic alcohol dehydrogenase-deficient deer mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 322:G327–G345. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00263.2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Roager HM, Licht TR. 2018. Microbial tryptophan catabolites in health and disease. Nat Commun 9:3294. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05470-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Lamas B, Richard ML, Leducq V, Pham H-P, Michel M-L, Da Costa G, Bridonneau C, Jegou S, Hoffmann TW, Natividad JM, Brot L, Taleb S, Couturier-Maillard A, Nion-Larmurier I, Merabtene F, Seksik P, Bourrier A, Cosnes J, Ryffel B, Beaugerie L, Launay J-M, Langella P, Xavier RJ, Sokol H. 2016. CARD9 impacts colitis by altering gut microbiota metabolism of tryptophan into aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands. Nat Med 22:598–605. doi: 10.1038/nm.4102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Venkatesh M, Mukherjee S, Wang H, Li H, Sun K, Benechet AP, Qiu Z, Maher L, Redinbo MR, Phillips RS, Fleet JC, Kortagere S, Mukherjee P, Fasano A, Le Ven J, Nicholson JK, Dumas ME, Khanna KM, Mani S. 2014. Symbiotic bacterial metabolites regulate gastrointestinal barrier function via the xenobiotic sensor PXR and toll-like receptor 4. Immunity 41:296–310. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Qian Y-Y, Ru N, Chen H, Zou W-B, Wu H, Pan J, Li B, Xin L, Guo J-Y, Tang X-Y, Hu L-H, Jin Z-D, Wang D, Du Y-Q, Wang L-W, Li Z-S, Liao Z. 2022. Rectal indometacin to prevent pancreatitis after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (RIPEP): a single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:238–244. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00434-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Hezaveh K, Shinde RS, Klötgen A, Halaby MJ, Lamorte S, Ciudad MT, Quevedo R, Neufeld L, Liu ZQ, Jin R, et al. 2022. Tryptophan-derived microbial metabolites activate the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in tumor-associated macrophages to suppress anti-tumor immunity. Immunity 55:324–340. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.01.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Li H, Xie J, Guo X, Yang G, Cai B, Liu J, Yue M, Tang Y, Wang G, Chen S, Guo J, Qi X, Wang D, Zheng H, Liu W, Yu H, Wang C, Zhu SJ, Guo F. 2022. Bifidobacterium spp. and their metabolite lactate protect against acute pancreatitis via inhibition of pancreatic and systemic inflammatory responses. Gut Microbes 14:2127456. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2127456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Hoque R, Farooq A, Ghani A, Gorelick F, Mehal WZ. 2014. Lactate reduces liver and pancreatic injury in Toll-like receptor- and inflammasome-mediated inflammation via GPR81-mediated suppression of innate immunity. Gastroenterology 146:1763–1774. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.03.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Ubachs J, Ziemons J, Soons Z, Aarnoutse R, van Dijk DPJ, Penders J, van Helvoort A, Smidt ML, Kruitwagen RFPM, Baade-Corpelijn L, Olde Damink SWM, Rensen SS. 2021. Gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acid alterations in cachectic cancer patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 12:2007–2021. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12804 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Zhu L-B, Zhang Y-C, Huang H-H, Lin J. 2021. Prospects for clinical applications of butyrate-producing bacteria. World J Clin Pediatr 10:84–92. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v10.i5.84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Režen T, Rozman D, Kovács T, Kovács P, Sipos A, Bai P, Mikó E. 2022. The role of bile acids in carcinogenesis. Cell Mol Life Sci 79:243. doi: 10.1007/s00018-022-04278-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Ding Q-Y, Tian J-X, Li M, Lian F-M, Zhao L-H, Wei X-X, Han L, Zheng Y-J, Gao Z-Z, Yang H-Y, Fang X-Y, Tong X-L. 2020. Interactions between therapeutics for metabolic disease, cardiovascular risk factors, and gut microbiota. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10:530160. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.530160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Bures J, Cyrany J, Kohoutova D, Förstl M, Rejchrt S, Kvetina J, Vorisek V, Kopacova M. 2010. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth syndrome. World J Gastroenterol 16:2978–2990. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i24.2978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Tran QT, Tran VH, Sendler M, Doller J, Wiese M, Bolsmann R, Wilden A, Glaubitz J, Modenbach JM, Thiel FG, de Freitas Chama LL, Weiss FU, Lerch MM, Aghdassi AA. 2021. Role of bile acids and bile salts in acute pancreatitis: from the experimental to clinical studies. Pancreas 50:3–11. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Darnton-Hill I. 2019. Public health aspects in the prevention and control of vitamin deficiencies. Curr Dev Nutr 3:zz075. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzz075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Conaway HH, Henning P, Lerner UH. 2013. Vitamin a metabolism, action, and role in skeletal homeostasis. Endocr Rev 34:766–797. doi: 10.1210/er.2012-1071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Gille D, Schmid A. 2015. Vitamin B12 in meat and dairy products. Nutr Rev 73:106–115. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuu011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Watanabe FT, Bito T. 2018. Vitamin B12 sources and microbial interaction. Exp Biol Med 243:148–158. doi: 10.1177/1535370217746612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Malaguarnera L. 2020. Vitamin D and microbiota: two sides of the same coin in the immunomodulatory aspects. Int Immunopharmacol 79:106112. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.106112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Wu S, Yoon S, Zhang Y-G, Lu R, Xia Y, Wan J, Petrof EO, Claud EC, Chen D, Sun J. 2015. Vitamin D receptor pathway is required for probiotic protection in colitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 309:G341–G349. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00105.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Liu PT, Stenger S, Li H, Wenzel L, Tan BH, Krutzik SR, Ochoa MT, Schauber J, Wu K, Meinken C, Kamen DL, Wagner M, Bals R, Steinmeyer A, Zügel U, Gallo RL, Eisenberg D, Hewison M, Hollis BW, Adams JS, Bloom BR, Modlin RL. 2006. Toll-like receptor triggering of a vitamin D-mediated human antimicrobial response. Science 311:1770–1773. doi: 10.1126/science.1123933 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Cirino G, Szabo C, Papapetropoulos A. 2023. Physiological roles of hydrogen sulfide in mammalian cells, tissues, and organs. Physiol Rev 103:31–276. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00028.2021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Kushkevych IV, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Czech Republic . 2016. Dissimilatory sulfate reduction in the intestinal sulfate-reducing bacteria. Biol Stud 10:197–228. doi: 10.30970/sbi.1001.560 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Wolfson SJ, Hitchings R, Peregrina K, Cohen Z, Khan S, Yilmaz T, Malena M, Goluch ED, Augenlicht L, Kelly L. 2022. Bacterial hydrogen sulfide drives cryptic redox chemistry in gut microbial communities. Nat Metab 4:1260–1270. doi: 10.1038/s42255-022-00656-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. He Z, Chen L, Catalan-Dibene J, Bongers G, Faith JJ, Suebsuwong C, DeVita RJ, Shen Z, Fox JG, Lafaille JJ, Furtado GC, Lira SA. 2021. Food colorants metabolized by commensal bacteria promote colitis in mice with dysregulated expression of interleukin-23. Cell Metab 33:1358–1371. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.04.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Haase S, Haghikia A, Wilck N, Müller DN, Linker RA. 2018. Impacts of microbiome metabolites on immune regulation and autoimmunity. Immunology 154:230–238. doi: 10.1111/imm.12933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Ceci FM, Ceccanti M, Petrella C, Vitali M, Messina MP, Chaldakov GN, Greco A, Ralli M, Lucarelli M, Angeloni A, Fiore M, Ferraguti G. 2021. Alcohol drinking, apolipoprotein polymorphisms and the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Curr Neurovasc Res 18:150–161. doi: 10.2174/1567202618666210406123503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Xia L, Xu Z, Zhou X, Bergmann F, Grabe N, Büchler MW, Neoptolemos JP, Hackert T, Kroemer G, Fortunato F. 2020. Impaired autophagy increases susceptibility to endotoxin-induced chronic pancreatitis. Cell Death Dis 11:889. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03050-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Benninghoff AD, Hintze KJ, Monsanto SP, Rodriguez DM, Hunter AH, Phatak S, Pestka JJ, Wettere AJV, Ward RE. 2020. Consumption of the total western diet promotes colitis and inflammation-associated colorectal cancer in mice. Nutrients 12:544. doi: 10.3390/nu12020544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Mentella MC, Scaldaferri F, Ricci C, Gasbarrini A, Miggiano GAD. 2019. Cancer and mediterranean diet: a review. Nutrients 11:2059. doi: 10.3390/nu11092059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Bükülmez A, Molon L. 2020. Evaluation of mediterranean diet adherence in children diagnosed with pancreatitis: a case-control study. Nutr Hosp 38:43–49. doi: 10.20960/nh.03281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Roberts KM, Golian P, Nahikian-Nelms M, Hinton A, Madril P, Basch K, Conwell D, Hart PA. 2019. Does the healthy eating index and mediterranean diet score identify the nutritional adequacy of dietary patterns in chronic pancreatitis? Dig Dis Sci 64:2318–2326. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05536-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Merra G, Noce A, Marrone G, Cintoni M, Tarsitano MG, Capacci A, De Lorenzo A. 2020. Influence of mediterranean diet on human gut microbiota. Nutrients 13:7. doi: 10.3390/nu13010007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. García-Montero C, Fraile-Martínez O, Gómez-Lahoz AM, Pekarek L, Castellanos AJ, Noguerales-Fraguas F, Coca S, Guijarro LG, García-Honduvilla N, Asúnsolo A, Sanchez-Trujillo L, Lahera G, Bujan J, Monserrat J, Álvarez-Mon M, Álvarez-Mon MA, Ortega MA. 2021. Nutritional components in western diet versus mediterranean diet at the gut microbiota-immune system interplay. Implications for health and disease. Nutrients 13:699. doi: 10.3390/nu13020699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Mukherjee D, DiVincenzo MJ, Torok M, Choueiry F, Kumar RJ, Deems A, Miller JL, Hinton A, Geraghty C, Maranon JA, Kulp SK, Coss C, Carson WE 3rd, Conwell DL, Hart PA, Cooperstone JL, Mace TA. 2020. Soy-tomato enriched diet reduces inflammation and disease severity in a pre-clinical model of chronic pancreatitis. Sci Rep 10:21824. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78762-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Chen J, Vitetta L. 2020. Gut microbiota metabolites in NAFLD pathogenesis and therapeutic implications. IJMS 21:5214. doi: 10.3390/ijms21155214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Mei Q-X, Hu J-H, Huang Z-H, Fan J-J, Huang C-L, Lu Y-Y, Wang X-P, Zeng Y. 2021. Pretreatment with chitosan oligosaccharides attenuate experimental severe acute pancreatitis via inhibiting oxidative stress and modulating intestinal homeostasis. Acta Pharmacol Sin 42:942–953. doi: 10.1038/s41401-020-00581-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Zhong Y, Cai D, Cai W, Geng S, Chen L, Han T. 2009. Protective effect of galactooligosaccharide-supplemented enteral nutrition on intestinal barrier function in rats with severe acute pancreatitis. Clin Nutr 28:575–580. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.04.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Portincasa P, Bonfrate L, Khalil M, Angelis MD, Calabrese FM, D’Amato M, Wang DQ-H, Di Ciaula A. 2021. Intestinal barrier and permeability in health, obesity and NAFLD. Biomedicines 10:83. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10010083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Wei L, Wen X-S, Xian CJ. 2021. Chemotherapy-induced intestinal microbiota dysbiosis impairs mucosal homeostasis by modulating Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Int J Mol Sci 22:9474. doi: 10.3390/ijms22179474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Huang L, Zeng Y, Duan L, Zhuang Q, Zhou Y, Wang L, Chen L, Liu X, Xiong Y. 2023. Optimal timing of free total rhubarb anthraquinones on immune regulation in rats with severe acute pancreatitis. J Ethnopharmacol 308:116266. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2023.116266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Zhou K. 2017. Strategies to promote abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila, an emerging probiotics in the gut, evidence from dietary intervention studies. J Funct Foods 33:194–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.03.045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Li J, Zhang S, Zhou R, Zhang J, Li Z-F. 2017. Perspectives of traditional Chinese medicine in pancreas protection for acute pancreatitis. WJG 23:3615. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i20.3615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Vlavcheski F, O’Neill EJ, Gagacev F, Tsiani E. 2022. Effects of Berberine against pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Molecules 27:27. doi: 10.3390/molecules27238630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Ma H, He K, Zhu J, Li X, Ye X. 2019. The anti-hyperglycemia effects of rhizoma coptidis alkaloids: a systematic review of modern pharmacological studies of the traditional herbal medicine. Fitoterapia 134:210–220. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2019.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Zhang X, Zhao Y, Xu J, Xue Z, Zhang M, Pang X, Zhang X, Zhao L. 2015. Modulation of gut microbiota by berberine and metformin during the treatment of high-fat diet-induced obesity in rats. Sci Rep 5:14405. doi: 10.1038/srep14405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Agah S, Akbari A, Sadeghi E, Morvaridzadeh M, Basharat Z, Palmowski A, Heshmati J. 2021. Resveratrol supplementation and acute pancreatitis: a comprehensive review. Biomed Pharmacother 137:111268. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Di S, Wang Y, Han L, Bao Q, Gao Z, Wang Q, Yang Y, Zhao L, Tong X. 2019. The intervention effect of traditional Chinese medicine on the intestinal flora and its metabolites in glycolipid metabolic disorders. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2019:2958920. doi: 10.1155/2019/2958920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Li J, Han J, Lv J, Wang S, Qu L, Jiang Y. 2020. Saikosaponin A-induced gut microbiota changes attenuate severe acute pancreatitis through the activation of Keap1/Nrf2-ARE antioxidant signaling. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2020:9217219. doi: 10.1155/2020/9217219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Liu G, Tian Y, Li G, Xu L, Song R, Zhang Z. 2013. Metabolism of saikosaponin a in rats: diverse oxidations on the aglycone moiety in liver and intestine in addition to hydrolysis of glycosidic bonds. Drug Metab Dispos 41:622–633. doi: 10.1124/dmd.112.048975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Bai Y, Zhou Y, Zhang R, Chen Y, Wang F, Zhang M. 2023. Gut microbial fermentation promotes the intestinal anti-inflammatory activity of Chinese yam polysaccharides. Food Chem 402:134003. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Li P, Zhang T, Xiao Y, Tian L, Cui B, Ji G, Liu Y-Y, Zhang F. 2019. Timing for the second fecal microbiota transplantation to maintain the long-term benefit from the first treatment for crohn’s disease. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:349–360. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9447-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Haifer C, Paramsothy S, Kaakoush NO, Saikal A, Ghaly S, Yang T, Luu LDW, Borody TJ, Leong RW. 2022. Lyophilised oral faecal microbiota transplantation for ulcerative colitis (LOTUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:141–151. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00400-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Liu L, Zhang T, Sui Y, Li G, Liu L, Lu T, Tan H, Sun B, Li X, Li L. 2023. Gut microbiota affects pancreatic fibrotic progression through immune modulation in chronic pancreatitis. Microb Pathog 177:106035. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2023.106035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from mSystems are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES