Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Neurol. 2024 Aug 3;96(5):944–957. doi: 10.1002/ana.27049

Table 2.

Individual-level performance summary using different input data.

PTs vs HCs
Input Data Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy AUC
MRF 0.945 ± 0.026 0.98 ± 0.031 0.962 ± 0.016 0.976 ± 0.009
MRF + MAP 0.952 ± 0.031 0.968 ± 0.019 0.959 ± 0.015 0.978 ± 0.011
T1w + MAP 0.485 ± 0.084 0.771 ± 0.124 0.616 ± 0.042 0.576 ± 0.051
Type II vs Non-type-II
MRF 0.84 ± 0.099 0.777 ± 0.1 0.815 ± 0.052 0.833 ± 0.045
MRF + MAP 0.835 ± 0.1 0.823 ± 0.103 0.83 ± 0.036 0.855 ± 0.035
T1w + MAP 0.755 ± 0.076 0.808 ± 0.086 0.776 ± 0.041 0.787 ± 0.041
Type IIa vs IIb
MRF 0.675 ± 0.146 0.825 ± 0.115 0.735 ± 0.09 0.734 ± 0.114
MRF + MAP 0.85 ± 0.133 0.9 ± 0.094 0.87 ± 0.06 0.886 ± 0.055
T1w + MAP 0.742 ± 0.164 0.8 ± 0.16 0.765 ± 0.1 0.758 ± 0.128

AUC = area under curve; HCs = healthy controls; MAP = morphometric analysis program; MRF = magnetic resonance fingerprinting; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PTs = patients.