Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 1;24(6):1785–1794. doi: 10.17305/bb.2024.10512

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analysis evaluating the relationship between long-term responders and clinicopathological factors

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR 95% CI P value HR 9 5 % CI P value
Age > 70 0.83 0.36–1.88 0.66
Gender, male 0.83 0.43–1.58 0.57
Histology clear-cell RCC 0.79 0.58–1.06 0.12
Previous nephrectomy, Yes 8.64 2.04–36.43 0.003 7.4 1.66–33.5 0.009
ECOG PS ≥ 1 0.52 0.29–0.93 0.028 0.51 0.26–0.98 0.04
Sarcomatoid feature, Yes 0.79 0.52–1.19 0.26
IMDC score intermediate-poor 0.40 0.22–0.72 0.002
Metastatic sites, n (%)
 Lung 0.97 0.53–1.75 0.92
 Liver 0.40 0.15–1.07 0.07
 Nodal 0.81 0.45–1.45 0.48
 Bone 0.43 0.22–0.82 0.01
 Brain 0.10 0.01–0.75 0.02 0.08 0.01–0.63 0.01
Line of therapy after TKI > 1, n (%) 0.11 0.05–0.21 0.001 0.26 0.13–0.5 0.001

ECOG PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scale; RCC: Renal cell carcinoma; TKI: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor; IMDC: International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium.