Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 1;24(6):1785–1794. doi: 10.17305/bb.2024.10512

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analysis evaluating the relationship between intermediate-poor risk long-term responders and clinicopathological factors

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
Age > 70 1.12 0.39–3.18 0.82
Gender, male 0.45 0.19–1.05 0.06
Histology clear-cell RCC 0.98 0.73–1.31 0.98
Previous nephrectomy, Yes 6.35 1.4–27.6 0 . 0 1 8.24 1.8–37.7 0 . 0 0 7
ECOG PS ≥ 1 0.40 0.16–0.94 0 . 0 3 0.34 0.13–0.88 0 . 0 2 7
Sarcomatoid feature, Yes 0.72 0.4–1.32 0.29
Metastatic sites, n (%)
 Lung 0.7 0.31–1.59 0.40
 Liver 0.66 0.21–2.04 0.48
 Nodal 1.1 0.49–2.48 0.80
 Bone 0.5 0.2–1.2 0.12
 Brain 0.01 0.00–1.1 0.90
Line of therapy after TKI > 1, n (%) 0.21 0.08–0.53 0.11 0.13 0.05–0.35 0 . 0 0 1

ECOG PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Scale; RCC: Renal cell carcinoma; TKI: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor.