Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 23;6(11):101169. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101169

Table 3.

AUROCs and 95% CIs of LiverRisk score, FIB-4, and APRI for the diagnosis of cACLD in cohorts I and II, as well as time-dependent AUROC values of LiverRisk score, LSM, FIB-4, and APRI for the prediction of hepatic decompensation in cohort I.

Metric Cohort I (n = 5,897) Cohort II (n = 1,558)
cACLD (≥10 kPa)
LiverRisk score 0.757 (0.744–0.770) 0.790 (0.762–0.819)
FIB-4 0.769 (0.755–0.783) 0.831 (0.785–0.841)
APRI
0.747 (0.733–0.762)
0.765 (0.734–0.797)

Cohort I (n = 5,897)
Hepatic decompensation
Time (years) 1 2 3 4 5
Events (n) 28 60 79 102 115
LiverRisk score 0.778 (0.703–0.852) 0.816 (0.772–0.860) 0.823 (0.787–0.858) 0.826 (0.795–0.858) 0.832 (0.803–0.860)
LSM 0.847 (0.779–0.915) 0.891 (0.855–0.927) 0.897 (0.865–0.928) 0.892 (0.865–0.918) 0.901 (0.877–0.925)
FIB-4 0.898 (0.854–0.943) 0.910 (0.874–0.946) 0.913 (0.883-0.942) 0.898 (0.868–0.928) 0.901 (0.872–0.929)
APRI 0.856 (0.802–0.909) 0.855 (0.814–0.895) 0.862 (0.829–0.894) 0.850 (0.819–0.880) 0.853 (0.824–0.882)

ROC analysis, time-dependent ROC analysis, and comparison according to Blanche et al.15 Level of significance after multiplicity correction: p <0.05.

AUROC, area under the receiver operator characteristics curve; APRI, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index; cACLD, compensated advanced chronic liver disease; FIB-4, fibrosis-4; LSM, liver stiffness measurement; ROC, receiver operator characteristics.

Statistically significant difference in AUROC compared with the AUROC of LiverRisk score (according to Blanche et al.15).