Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 24;20(9):5973–5995. doi: 10.1002/alz.14115

TABLE 1.

Demographics: Data from 17 CHARGE cohorts were included in our meta‐analysis, as were the UKBB, ADGC, and EADB for the replication of our VaD results in European ancestry.

Study N/Control ACD VaD Percentage VaD Age (mean) Sex, % (percentage female)
European ancestry
3C 6475 808 162 20.1 74.2 61.0
AGES 5656 1501 118 7.9 76.1 61.0
ARIC 3145 165 36 21.8 75.5 60.0
ASPREE 12,480 319 NA NA 75.0 55.0
CHS 2169 508 156 30.7 74.9 61.5
FVG 804 73 NA NA 58.2 58.3
FHS 4175 679 167 24.5 54.6 54.3
GRACE 12,599 7516 1953 26.0 78.8 68.2
GREAT‐AGE 1504 138 7 5.1 73.7 50.3
HUNT 69,633 3982 681 17.1 67.7 57.4
MEMENTO 2050 263 36 13.7
MYHAT 865 50 NA NA 83.7 59.5
ROSMAP 1335 626 NA NA 79.8 69.7
RS (1,2,3) 11,390 1715 178 10.4 63.6 56.8
ADGC‐NAJ‐2011 15,675 8309 NA NA 75.4 59.5
UKBB 314,278 17,008 332 NA 66.1 63.1
Total European 466,606 44,009 3892
African ancestry
ARIC 905 101 31 30.7 75.5 60.0
CHS 514 194 65 33.5 74.9 61.5
ADGC‐Reitz (2013) 5896 1968 NA NA 80.5 63.9
Total African 7315 2263 96
Asian ancestry
HKOS 2373 349 66 18.9 60.1 67.9
Harmonization 385 153 49 32.0 73.6 55.0
Total Asian 2758 502 115
Hispanic ancestry
SALSA 1271 128 35 27.3 68.9 58.6
Total Stage 1 for ACD and VaD 477,950 46,902 4138
Replication of VaD results in EADB
EADB 275,745 NA 4,564
Total 753,695 46,902 8702

Note: Overall, 800,597 individuals were included in this study, accounting for 46,902 and 8702 cases of ACD and VaD, respectively. For UKBB, we used the proxy‐AD (familial AD) for ACD analysis and assessed VaD cases using ICD10 codes (see Methods). We also used ADGC‐NAJ‐201118 and ADGC‐Reitz‐201319 for ACD in European and African ancestry, respectively, to avoid overlap with CHARGE samples. We subsequently replicated our VaD results in EADB.

Abbreviations: ACD, all‐cause dementia; ADGC, Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium; EADB, the European Alzheimer Disease Biobank; UKBB, the UK Biobank.