Table 1.
First author, reference number | Study characteristics | Patient characteristics | Results | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dekker et al.29 |
Retrospective study 01/2007–06/2016 |
Stimulation group: GA 290/7 [273/7; 302/7] weeks n = 164 |
Analyzed time frame: first 7 min of resuscitation Details of TS: 67% stimulation rate onset after 114 s [73 s; 182 s] episodes per infant 3 [1; 5] duration per episode 8 s [4 s; 16 s] overall duration 32 s [15 s; 64 s] Methods (%—of overall episodes): 68% foot rub 12% back rub 2% foot flick 9% combination 8% others Physiological and clinical outcomes: 18% heart rate recovery (HR, >100 bpm) and/or increased breathing efforts 7% were intubated* |
|
Gaertner et al.28 |
Retrospective study 2004–2006 |
<30 weeks of GA GA 270/7 [250/7; 280/7] weeks n = 60 ≥30 weeks of GA GA 345/7 [310/7; 390/7] weeks n = 60 |
Analyzed time frame: first 5 min of resuscitation Details of TS: 63% stimulation rate 58% stimulation within the first minute Methods (%—of overall episodes): 41% drying 37% chest rub 12% back rub 10% foot flick Physiological and clinical outcomes: HR increase (before and 5 s after stimulation) 1 bpm [−2 bpm; 3 bpm] SpO2 increase (before and 5 s after stimulation) 1% [−1%; 4%] 36% crying after stimulation 71% limb movements after stimulation 37% facial grimace after stimulation |
|
<30 weeks of GA): Details of TS: 35% stimulation rate onset after 19 s [13 s, 32 s] episodes per infant 0 [0; 1]* |
≥30 weeks of GA: Details of TS: 90% stimulation rate onset after 19 s [15 s, 24 s] episodes per infant 1 [1; 3]* |
|||
Baik-Schneditz et al.42 |
Secondary analysis of the prospective study and RCT 01/2012–12/2014 |
<37 + 0 weeks of GA: GA 34.9 ± 1.4 weeks n = 18 ≥37 + 0 weeks of GA: GA 38.9 ± 0.73 weeks n = 25 |
Analyzed time frame: first 15 min of resuscitation Preterm infants: Details of TS: 43% stimulation rate episodes per infant 1 [1; 7], overall duration 15 s [5 s; 63 s] Methods (%—of overall infants): 56% sternum 28% feet 6% back 11% several different Physiological and clinical outcomes: SpO2 increase of 14.2 % (30 s before and after each stimulation)* no significant change in heart rate 78% needed respiratory support |
Term infants: Details of TS: 54% stimulation rate episodes per infant 1 [1; 13], overall duration 29 s [4 s; 230 s] Methods (%—of overall infants): 28% sternum 28% feet 8% back 36% several different Physiological and clinical outcomes: no significant change in SpO2 no significant change in heart rate 39% needed respiratory support |
Pietravalle et al.43 | Secondary analysis of the prospective study |
GA 38 [37; 40] weeks n = 102 |
Analyzed time frame: depends on the infant’s transition Details of TS: 68% stimulation rate 28% infants were stimulated within first minute onset after 134 s [53 s; 251 s] overall duration 17 s [9 s; 33 s] episodes per infants 4 [2; 7], Methods (%—of episodes): 54% back rub 79% chest rub 39% abdomen rub 39% foot flick 96% truncal stimulation (chest ± back rub) Physiological and clinical outcomes: response to TS (defined as complete newborn recovery (i.e., spontaneous breathing without need for PPV) in 9% of infants (especially after rubbing the back) |
|
Dekker et al.27 |
Single-center RCT 09/2016–04/2017 |
270/7–320/7 weeks of GA Repetitive stimulation group (defined as gently rubbing the back or the soles of the feet during 10 s, alternated with 10 s of rest): GA 295/7 [281/7; 306/7] weeks n = 21 Standard stimulation group: GA 290/7 [275/7; 310/7] weeks n = 23 |
Analyzed time frame: first 4 min of resuscitation Standard stimulation Details of TS: 96% stimulated onset after 74.5 s [±42.9 s] episodes per infant 3 [3; 6]* overall duration 59 s [24 s; 120 s] Methods (%—of episodes): 4% back rub 91% foot rub 4% both Primary outcome: minute volume after 1–4 min 51.5 ml/kg [5.3 ml|kg; 114.2 ml|kg] Physiological and clinical outcomes: average oxygen saturation 81.7 ± 8,7% * FiO2 at the start of transport to the NICU 0.34 [0.29; 0.44]* caffeine administration 39.1%* No statistical differences between both groups: |
Repetitive stimulation Details of TS: 100% stimulated onset after 71.3 s [±34.1 s] episodes per infant 8 [7; 10]* overall duration 86 s [63 s; 105 s] Methods (%—of episodes): 1% back rub 95% foot rub 4% both Primary outcome: minute volume after 1–4 min 69.2 ml/kg [11.5 ml/kg; 153.9 ml/kg] Physiological and clinical outcomes: average oxygen saturation 87.6 ± 3.3%* FiO2 at the start of transport to the NICU 0.28 [0.23; 0.35]* caffeine administration 9.5%* |
MV at minutes 1–4 and 1–7; respiratory rate, tidal volume, RoR of spontaneous breaths on CPAP, percentage of tidal volumes >4 ml/kg or >8 ml/kg; pulse rate, FiO2, administration/duration of PPV | ||||
van Henten et al.44 | Prospective study |
GA 34 [32; 36] weeks n = 40 |
Analyzed time frame: first 10 min of resuscitation Details of TS: 90% stimulated 48% repetitively onset after 15 s [10 s; 40 s] episodes per infant 1.5 [1; 3] overall duration 28 s [14 s; 47 s] Methods/location: 84% drying 43% rubbing 0% flicking 2.5% combination of different types 20% sternum/chest 20% back 0% feet 85% combination of different locations Physiological and clinical outcomes: no association between TS and first spontaneous breath |
Only the data of stimulated infants are depicted. Data are presented as median (IQR) or mean ± SD, asterisks (*) mark the statistically significant results.
RCT randomized controlled trial, GA gestational age, TS tactile stimulation, HR heart rate, SpO2 peripheral oxygen saturation, FiO2 fraction of inspired oxygen, NICU neonatal intensive care unit, MV minute volume, RoR rate of rise to maximum tidal volumes, CPAP continuous positive airway pressure, PPV positive pressure ventilation.