Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 5;96(3):616–624. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-01945-9

Table 1.

Overview of the current evidence on TS in the delivery room.

First author, reference number Study characteristics Patient characteristics Results
Dekker et al.29

Retrospective study

01/2007–06/2016

Stimulation group:

GA 290/7 [273/7; 302/7] weeks

n = 164

Analyzed time frame: first 7 min of resuscitation

Details of TS:

67% stimulation rate

onset after 114 s [73 s; 182 s]

episodes per infant 3 [1; 5]

duration per episode 8 s [4 s; 16 s]

overall duration 32 s [15 s; 64 s]

Methods (%—of overall episodes):

68% foot rub

12% back rub

2% foot flick

9% combination

8% others

Physiological and clinical outcomes:

18% heart rate recovery (HR, >100 bpm) and/or increased breathing efforts

7% were intubated*

Gaertner et al.28

Retrospective study

2004–2006

<30 weeks of GA

GA 270/7 [250/7; 280/7] weeks

n = 60

≥30 weeks of GA

GA 345/7 [310/7; 390/7] weeks

n = 60

Analyzed time frame: first 5 min of resuscitation

Details of TS:

63% stimulation rate

58% stimulation within the first minute

Methods (%—of overall episodes):

41% drying

37% chest rub

12% back rub

10% foot flick

Physiological and clinical outcomes:

HR increase (before and 5 s after stimulation) 1 bpm [−2 bpm; 3 bpm]

SpO2 increase (before and 5 s after stimulation) 1% [−1%; 4%]

36% crying after stimulation

71% limb movements after stimulation

37% facial grimace after stimulation

<30 weeks of GA):

Details of TS:

35% stimulation rate

onset after 19 s [13 s, 32 s]

episodes per infant 0 [0; 1]*

≥30 weeks of GA:

Details of TS:

90% stimulation rate

onset after 19 s [15 s, 24 s]

episodes per infant 1 [1; 3]*

Baik-Schneditz et al.42

Secondary analysis of the prospective study and RCT

01/2012–12/2014

<37 + 0 weeks of GA:

GA 34.9 ± 1.4 weeks

n = 18

≥37 + 0 weeks of GA:

GA 38.9 ± 0.73 weeks

n = 25

Analyzed time frame: first 15 min of resuscitation

Preterm infants:

Details of TS:

43% stimulation rate

episodes per infant 1 [1; 7],

overall duration 15 s [5 s; 63 s]

Methods (%—of overall infants):

56% sternum

28% feet

6% back

11% several different

Physiological and clinical outcomes:

SpO2 increase of 14.2 % (30 s before and after each stimulation)*

no significant change in heart rate

78% needed respiratory support

Term infants:

Details of TS:

54% stimulation rate

episodes per infant 1 [1; 13],

overall duration 29 s [4 s; 230 s]

Methods (%—of overall infants):

28% sternum

28% feet

8% back

36% several different

Physiological and clinical outcomes:

no significant change in SpO2

no significant change in heart rate

39% needed respiratory support

Pietravalle et al.43 Secondary analysis of the prospective study

GA 38 [37; 40] weeks

n = 102

Analyzed time frame: depends on the infant’s transition

Details of TS:

68% stimulation rate

28% infants were stimulated within first minute

onset after 134 s [53 s; 251 s]

overall duration 17 s [9 s; 33 s]

episodes per infants 4 [2; 7],

Methods (%—of episodes):

54% back rub

79% chest rub

39% abdomen rub

39% foot flick

96% truncal stimulation (chest ± back rub)

Physiological and clinical outcomes:

response to TS (defined as complete newborn recovery (i.e., spontaneous breathing without need for PPV) in 9% of infants (especially after rubbing the back)

Dekker et al.27

Single-center RCT

09/2016–04/2017

270/7–320/7 weeks of GA

Repetitive stimulation group (defined as gently rubbing the back or the soles of the feet during 10 s, alternated with 10 s of rest):

GA 295/7 [281/7; 306/7] weeks

n = 21

Standard stimulation group:

GA 290/7 [275/7; 310/7] weeks

n = 23

Analyzed time frame: first 4 min of resuscitation

Standard stimulation

Details of TS:

96% stimulated

onset after 74.5 s [±42.9 s]

episodes per infant 3 [3; 6]*

overall duration 59 s [24 s; 120 s]

Methods (%—of episodes):

4% back rub

91% foot rub

4% both

Primary outcome:

minute volume after 1–4 min 51.5 ml/kg [5.3 ml|kg; 114.2 ml|kg]

Physiological and clinical outcomes:

average oxygen saturation 81.7 ± 8,7% *

FiO2 at the start of transport to the NICU 0.34 [0.29; 0.44]*

caffeine administration 39.1%*

No statistical differences between both groups:

Repetitive stimulation

Details of TS:

100% stimulated

onset after 71.3 s [±34.1 s]

episodes per infant 8 [7; 10]*

overall duration 86 s [63 s; 105 s]

Methods (%—of episodes):

1% back rub

95% foot rub

4% both

Primary outcome:

minute volume after 1–4 min 69.2 ml/kg [11.5 ml/kg; 153.9 ml/kg]

Physiological and clinical outcomes:

average oxygen saturation 87.6 ± 3.3%*

FiO2 at the start of transport to the NICU 0.28 [0.23; 0.35]*

caffeine administration 9.5%*

MV at minutes 1–4 and 1–7; respiratory rate, tidal volume, RoR of spontaneous breaths on CPAP, percentage of tidal volumes >4 ml/kg or >8 ml/kg; pulse rate, FiO2, administration/duration of PPV
van Henten et al.44 Prospective study

GA 34 [32; 36] weeks

n = 40

Analyzed time frame: first 10 min of resuscitation

Details of TS:

90% stimulated

48% repetitively

onset after 15 s [10 s; 40 s]

episodes per infant 1.5 [1; 3]

overall duration 28 s [14 s; 47 s]

Methods/location:

84% drying

43% rubbing

0% flicking

2.5% combination of different types

20% sternum/chest

20% back

0% feet

85% combination of different locations

Physiological and clinical outcomes:

no association between TS and first spontaneous breath

Only the data of stimulated infants are depicted. Data are presented as median (IQR) or mean ± SD, asterisks (*) mark the statistically significant results.

RCT randomized controlled trial, GA gestational age, TS tactile stimulation, HR heart rate, SpO2 peripheral oxygen saturation, FiO2 fraction of inspired oxygen, NICU neonatal intensive care unit, MV minute volume, RoR rate of rise to maximum tidal volumes, CPAP continuous positive airway pressure, PPV positive pressure ventilation.