Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 23;14:25022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75557-0

Table 5.

Logistic regression analysis of the association between mir-20a-5p expression levels in stroma, in relation to clinicopathological parameters and breast cancer risk factors.

N Odds ratio 95% Confidence interval p-value
Tumor size 309 0.90 0.67–1.20 0.48
Tumor grade
 1 97 Ref Ref Ref
 2 129 1.22 0.56–2.66 0.61
 3 82 1.59 0.70–3.61 0.27
Molecular subgroup
 Luminal A 191 Ref Ref Ref
 Luminal B 63 1.20 0.54–2.64 0.66
 HER2-enriched 15 0.98 0.21–4.58 0.98
 Basal like 39 1.64 0.68–3.95 0.27
Estrogen receptor
 Negative 59 Ref Ref Ref
 Positive 250 0.82 0.38–1.77 0.62
Progesterone receptor
 Negative 97 Ref Ref Ref
 Positive 202 0.92 0.47–1.80 0.80
HER2
 Negative 270 Ref Ref Ref
 Positive 38 1.08 0.42–2.74 0.88
Ki67
 Low 173 Ref Ref Ref
 High 87 2.02 1.02–4.01 0.043
Lymph node metastasis
 No 215 Ref Ref Ref
 Yes 92 1.30 0.67–2.52 0.44
Distant metastasisa
 No 273 Ref Ref Ref
 Yes 33 1.04 0.38–2.85 0.94
Relapse
 No 282 Ref Ref Ref
 Yes 25 3.02 1.22–7.49 0.017
Menopausal statusb
 Post 217 Ref Ref Ref
 Pre 92 2.81 1.48–5.33 0.002
BMI
 Low 274 Ref Ref Ref
 High 28 0.41 0.09–1.81 0.24
Parity
 Nulliparous 31 Ref Ref Ref
 Parous 278 1.20 0.40–3.61 0.74
Oral contraceptives
 Never 114 Ref Ref Ref
 Ever 184 0.74 0.39–1.40 0.36
Alcohol consumption 302 0.99 0.92–1.07 0.76
Smoking
 Never 106 Ref Ref Ref
 Ever 202 1.24 0.63–2.44 0.54

HER2 Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. aAt any time, bAt diagnosis.