Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 23;14:25022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75557-0

Table 7.

Logistic regression analysis of miR-20a-5p expression levels in nucleus, in relation to clinicopathological parameters and breast cancer risk factors.

N Odds ratio 95% Confidence interval p-value
Tumor size 312 0.81 0.67–0.99 0.039
Tumor grade
 1 98 Ref Ref Ref
 2 132 0.65 0.38–1.11 0.12
 3 81 1.14 0.62–2.09 0.68
Molecular subgroup
 Luminal A 193 Ref Ref Ref
 Luminal B 63 0.94 0.53–1.68 0.84
 HER2-enriched 15 0.47 0.16–1.38 0.17
 Basal like 40 1.06 0.53–2.13 0.87
Estrogen receptor
 Negative 60 Ref Ref Ref
 Positive 252 1.25 0.71–2.19 0.45
Progesterone receptor
 Negative 100 Ref Ref Ref
 Positive 202 1.15 0.71–1.86 0.57
HER2
 Negative 273 Ref Ref Ref
 Positive 38 0.80 0.40–1.57 0.51
Ki67
 Low 175 Ref Ref Ref
 High 87 1.57 0.92–2.69 0.10
Lymph node metastasis
 No 216 Ref Ref Ref
 Yes 94 0.60 0.37–0.97 0.039
Distant metastasisa
 No 275 Ref Ref Ref
 Yes 34 0.62 0.30–1.27 0.19
Relapse
 No 285 Ref Ref Ref
 Yes 25 1.98 0.80–4.89 0.14
Menopausal statusb
 Post 219 Ref Ref Ref
 Pre 93 1.60 0.97–2.65 0.07
BMI
 Low 276 Ref Ref Ref
 High 29 0.75 0.35–1.62 0.47
Parity
 Nulliparous 32 Ref Ref Ref
 Parous 280 0.80 0.38–1.70 0.56
Oral contraceptives
 Never 115 Ref Ref Ref
 Ever 186 1.18 0.74–1.89 0.49
Alcohol 306 0.99 0.94–1.04 0.72
Smoking
 Never 108 Ref Ref Ref
 Ever 203 0.86 0.54–1.39 0.55

HER2 Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. aAt any time, bAt diagnosis.