Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 7;2013(12):CD002963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002963.pub2

Sood 2007.

Methods Randomly allocated by computer‐generated random numbers kept in sealed envelopes to either vibroacoustic stimulated modified biophysical profile (VAS/mFBP) or mock stimulation (mFBP).
Participants 214 women with high risk singleton pregnancies detected amongst women attending antenatal clinic. Country: India.
Interventions Vibroacoustic stimulation was done with EMCO vibroacoustic stimulator (EMCO Health Care Pvt Ltd, Sion, Mumbai, India) with 75 db sound intensity at 1.0 meter and frequency of 75 Hz.
Outcomes Mean testing time for modified biophysical profile, caesarean section for fetal distress, 5 minute Apgar score < 7, admission to NICU for more than 24 hours.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomised by computer‐generated random numbers.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Random numbers kept in sealed envelopes.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Follow‐up: 100%.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes in the methods section have been reported on in the results section.
Other bias Low risk No evidence of any other form of bias.