Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 24;15:9167. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53441-9

Table 1.

Synthesis method, thickness, and grain size of the as-deposited and annealed Cu films at 500 °C

STEM thickness of as-deposited PVD films (nm) Grain size of as-deposited PVD films (nm) STEM thickness of annealed PVD films (nm) Grain size of annealed PVD films (nm) STEM thickness of as-deposited PVD-EP films (nm) Grain size of as-deposited PVD-EP films (nm) STEM thickness of annealed PVD-EP films (nm) Grain size of annealed PVD-EP films (nm)
≈27.0 22.8  ± 4.6 ≈27.0 21.6 ± 5.2 ≈44.0 29.2 ±  8.2 ≈43.0 34.6 ± 6.8
≈57.0 32.9 ± 7.2 ≈57.0 49.4 ± 7.3 ≈109.0 62.7 ± 15.9 ≈119.0 125.8 ± 13.9
≈118.0 75.2 ± 14.1 ≈119.0 113.4 ± 13.4 ≈595.0 289.9 ± 37.8 ≈559.0 672.1 ± 170.8
≈1108.0 926.8 ± 173.8
≈5550.0 978.3 ± 290.6

The thickness and grain size of the films are determined over a large area. We find that the thickness of PVD films is uniform. Thick PVD-EP films (thickness of ≈109 nm or greater) exhibit non-uniform thickness (see also in Supporting information). However, this variation does not impact the in-plane thermal conductivity trends, as both the grain size and film thickness are significantly larger than the electron mean free path. The grain size does not vary much for as-deposited PVD and PVD-EP films having comparable thicknesses.