Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 25;45(15):e70054. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70054

TABLE 1.

Volumes (Mean ± SD) of manual (Manual‐OAP) and automated segmentation (ASHS‐OAP).

Segmentation method Manual‐OAP volume ASHS‐OAP volume
Hemisphere Left Right Total Left Right Total
CA1 625.87 ± 124.11 614.95 ± 121.63 1240.82 ± 128.50 624.13 ± 105.31 613.13 ± 94.55 1237.26 ± 113.47
CA2/CA3/DG 952.53 ± 151.92 990.24 ± 182.35 1942.77 ± 268.26 936.72 ± 108.62 967.45 ± 117.90 1904.16 ± 220.86
SUB 599.12 ± 195.26 540.45 ± 178.32 1139.57 ± 254.49 587.82 ± 141.02 538.73 ± 107.95 1126.55 ± 146.33
alERC 671.79 ± 176.31 700.59 ± 138.45 1372.38 ± 214.84 631.72 ± 120.39 664.70 ± 102.81 1296.42 ± 159.21
pmERC 219.38 ± 160.34 240.54 ± 138.74 459.93 ± 164.04 191.44 ± 133.98 219.48 ± 127.67 410.92 ± 140.74
PRC 2615.67 ± 505.95 2227.50 ± 636.84 4843.17 ± 1080.47 2524.22 ± 326.78 2098.59 ± 386.67 4622.81 ± 718.12
PHC 1894.22 ± 339.86 1774.50 ± 269.88 3668.72 ± 558.85 1918.20 ± 271.49 1756.55 ± 240.11 3674.76 ± 461.063

Note: Analyses were run on total volume; however, for completeness, we have reported left and right volumes for each MTL subregion. None of the regions of interest had significantly different volumes between Manual‐OAP and ASHS‐OAP when multiple comparisons were taken into account.