Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 24;16(9):e70136. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70136

Table 1. Urinary stone analysis according to patient characteristics .

Correlation of urinary stone composition with patient demographics and clinical profiles

Parameters Urinary stones (calculi)
Overall n(%) Male n(%) Female n(%)
  1231 876 (71.2) * 355 (28.8) *
Mean age (Mean±SD)   39.13±14.5 38.59±14.7 40.47±13.8
Age range (years) 1-10 35 (2.8) 25 (2.01) 10 (0.81)
11-20 51 (4.1) 38 (3.08) 13 (1.05)
21-30 286 (23.2) 210 (17.1) 76 (6.1)
31-40 343 (27.9) 251 (20.4) 92 (7.4)
41-50 244 (19.8) 165 (13.4) 79 (6.4)
51-60 171 (13.9) 110 (8.9) 61 (5.0)
61-70 88 (7.1) 65 (5.3) 23 (1.9)
71-80 09 (0.7) 08 (0.6) 1 (0.1)
81-90 04 (0.3) 04 (0.3) 00 (0)
Stone location Kidney 922 (74.9) 652 (53) 270 (21.9)
Bladder 92 (7.5) 75 (6.1) 17 (1.4)
Ureter 217 (17.6) 147 (11.9) 70 (5.7)
Chief complaints Flank pain/abdominal pain 593 (48.1) 421 (34.2) 172 (13.9)
Nausea/vomiting 227 (18.4)  151 (12.3) 76 (6.2)
Hematuria 167 (13.6) 110 (8.9) 57 (4.7)
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) 135 (11.0) 41 (3.4)              94 (7.7)
Fever with chills 105 (8.5) 73 (5.9) 32 (2.6)
  * The p-value for the difference in occurrence between males and females is significant, determined by the non-parametric binomial test.