Table 2. QUADAS-2 quality assessment summary—review authors’ judgements.
Study | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns | |||||
Patient selection | Index test | Reference standard | Flow and timing | Patient selection | Index test | Reference standard | |
Chun and Siu14 | High | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low | Low |
Giachino et al15 | Low | High | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low | Low |
Lian et al16 | Low | High | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low | Low |
Meng et al17 | High | High | Unclear | Unclear | High | High | Low |
Morello et al18 | High | Low | Low | Low | Unclear | Low | Low |
Morello et al19 | Low | High | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Morello et al20 | High | High | Low | High | Low | Low | Low |
Morello et al21 | Unclear | High | Low | High | Low | Low | Low |
Peng et al22 | High | High | Unclear | Low | High | Low | Low |
Suzuki et al23 | High | High | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low |
von Kodolitsch et al24 | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | High | Unclear | Low | Low |
Wang et al25 | High | High | Unclear | Low | High | Low | Low |
Zhang et al26 | Low | High | Unclear | High | Low | Low | Low |
QUADAS-2Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2