Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 3;22(4):259–270. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14362

Table 1.

Previous studies associated with Parkinson's disease and physical frailty

First author Year published Study designs Participants (n) Frailty evaluation method Prevalence of frailty, n (%) Mean age at evaluation, years (SD) Mean PD disease duration, years (SD) PD evaluation method (motor) PD evaluation method (non‐motor)
Ahmed 2008 Cross‐sectional PD: 50 Phenotype model Frailty: 16 (32.7%) 70.8 ± 9.2 UPDRS
Non‐frail: 33 (67.3%)
Roland et al. (Ref. 23) 2012 Cross‐sectional 29 Phenotype model Frailty: 1 (3.4%) 66.4 ± 8.5 7.2 ± 4.6 H‐Y PDQ‐39
Pre‐frailty: 19 (65.5%)
Non‐frailty: 9 (31%)
Roland et al. (Ref. 25) 2012 Cross‐sectional 17 Phenotype model Frailty: 5 (29.4%) Frailty: 65 ± 11.2 Frailty: 4.6 ± 1.8 H‐Y
Pre‐frailty: 65 ± 9.4
Pre‐frailty: 11.1 ± 7.9
Pre‐frailty: 8 (47.1%)
Non‐frailty: 2.8 ± 2.2
Non‐frailty: 68 ± 2.6
Non‐frailty: 4 (23.5%)

Roland et al.

(Ref. 24)

2012 Cross‐sectional

PD:15

Control: 15

Phenotype model

Frailty: 4 (26.7%)

Pre‐frailty: 7 (46.7%)

Non‐frailty: 4 (26.7%)

Frailty: 63 ± 11

Pre‐frailty: 65 ± 10

Non‐frailty: 69 ± 1

Roland et al.

(Ref. 26)

2013 Cross‐sectional 13 Phenotype model

Frailty: 3 (23.1%)

Pre‐frailty: 6 (46.2%)

Non‐frailty: 4 (30.8%)

Frailty: 67 ± 9

Pre‐frailty: 66 ± 9

Non‐frailty: 69 ± 1

Frailty: 5.7 ± 1.2

Pre‐frailty: 10.7 ± 7.9

Non‐frailty: 3.3 ± 2.3

H‐Y
Buchman 2013 Prospective

Lewy body pathology: 159 (20.1%)

Nigral neuronal loss: 106 (13.4%)

(All participants: 791)

Phenotype model
Liotta 2016 Cross‐sectional

PD: 18

(All participants: 1331)

FGE
Torsney 2018 Cross‐sectional PD: 393 CSF Frailty: 330 (84%) PD: 82.8 CCI Prevalence of depression, dementia or new cognitive impairment
Peball 2018 Cross‐sectional

PD: 104

(Control: 434)

CSHA

CSF

Frailty: 37 (35.6%) PD: 73.8 ± 5.2 12.0 ± 7.9

H‐Y

MDS‐UPDRS Part I–IV

ADL

PDQ‐39
Tan 2018 Cross‐sectional

PD: 93

(Control: 78)

Phenotype model

Frailty index

PD

Fried's criteria: (27.9%)

Frailty index: (69.2)

PD: 66.0 ± 8.5 8.5 ± 5.6

H‐Y

MDS‐UPDRS Part I–IV

Rennne 2018 Cross‐sectional PD: 6 (all participants: 241) TFI PD: 79.3
Lin 2019 Cross‐sectional 76 Phenotype model 29 (38%)

PD with frailty: 2.74 (2.82)

PD without frailty: 2.12 (2.70)

H‐Y, UPDRS Part I–III, S&E ADL

Attention function, Executive function

Memory function

Visuospatial function

Ntanasi 2020 Cross‐sectional

PD: 34 Prodromal PD: 49

Non‐PD: 1682

Phenotype model Frailty index

Phenotype criteria

PD: 5 (14.7%)

Prodromal PD: 5 (10.2%)

Non‐PD: 65 (3.9%)

Frailty index

PD: 26 (76.5%)

Prodromal PD: 33 (67.3%)

Non‐PD: 332 (19.7%)

PD: 76 (73–79)

Prodromal PD: 76 (73–79)

Non‐PD: 73 (69–77)

Smith 2021 Cross‐sectional PD: 120 Phenotype model 31.2 (26%) 70.2 ± 8.0 MDS‐UPDRS Part I–IV MoCAGDS
Abraham 2021 Cross‐sectional PD: 62786 CFI 34 708 (55.3%)

Abbreviations: ADL, activities of daily living; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; CFI, Claims‐based Frailty Index; CFS, Clinical Frailty Scale; CSHA, Canadian Scale of Health and Aging; FGE, Functional Geriatric Evaluation; GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale; H‐Y, Hoehn–Yahr stage; MDS‐UPDRS, Movement Disorders Society‐Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; PD, Parkinson's disease; PDQ‐39, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire‐39; SD, standard deviation; S&E, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale.