Abstract

The development of peptide-based, radiometal-labeled PET imaging agents has seen an increase in attention due to the favorable properties the peptide backbone exhibits. These include high selectivity and affinity to proteins and cells directly linked to various types of cancers. In addition, rapid clearance from circulation and low toxicity allow for unique approaches to engineering a viable peptide-based imaging agent. Utilizing peptides as the backbone allows for various modifications to improve metabolic stability, target cell affinity, and image quality and imaging capabilities and reduce toxicity. Select radiolabeled peptides have already been FDA approved, with many more in late-stage trials. This review summarizes the current state of the radiometal-labeled PET peptide imaging field as well as explores methods used by researchers to modify peptides, concluding with a look at the future of peptide-based therapy and diagnostics.
Keywords: peptides, peptide PET imaging, peptide stability, peptide theranostics, metal chelators, metal radioisotopes, 68-gallium, 64-copper
1. Introduction
The success of cancer therapy relies on the speed and accuracy that tumor cells can be identified and treated.1−4 A wider understanding of the nature of these tumor cells as well as their interactions with certain surrounding proteins allows for a variety of approaches to positively identify the presence of tumor cells at an early stage. Current forms of imaging include positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography scans, each with their own advantages and uses.5−10 Many factors determine which type of imaging is used in the context of cancer therapeutics such as the type and location of the tumor cells and to contextualize the growth of the tumor cells.11−14 However, PET scans are the most advantageous15−17 because they show changes on the cellular level and reveal tumor activity at an early stage.18 They can detect cancer, identify the stage of progression, determine if the tumor has metastasized, and characterize growth based on metabolic activity.19−24
In PET scans, a radiopharmaceutical is injected into the patient. They can take many forms but must contain an atom that can undergo beta plus decay,25,26 wherein a proton is converted into a neutron, releasing a positron and electron neutrino in the process. Positrons then interact with electrons and annihilate each other, releasing γ-rays.27 These γ-rays are detected using scintillation cameras. Readings are taken from multiple angles to create a 3-dimensional map of where the gamma signals are coming from.19,27
An important factor in the success of PET scans is the use of effective and highly target-specific probes that retain in vivo stability and have a sufficient half-life to allow for imaging.28,29 These radiotracers bind to the target to form a three-dimensional image of the body showing the location of the target of interest.28 A frequently used radiotracer is [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG).30−33 Based on the structure of glucose, with a radioactive fluorine isotope (18F) at the 2 position, this radiotracer is widely used either as a single tracer or in combination with other targeted therapies,34−36 such as obtaining both PET and CT signals for a more sensitive and specific image synergizing each method’s advantages37 or in cancer imaging due to the need of sugar for tumor growth.38 However, [18F]FDG is susceptible to false positives, being prone to accumulate in infectious or inflammatory tissue, and false negatives, such as small-sized tumors and tumors with low glycolytic activity.39,40 An alternative method to [18F]FDG imaging that has seen much interest lately is peptide-based PET imaging agents. Peptides have unique characteristics that make them well suited for imaging applications. Peptides can be selectively designed to bind target proteins, enzymes, or other biomolecules directly associated with tumor growth, which is an advantage that is not seen among other traditional forms of imaging.41−43 This allows for quick binding and early detection of tumors, leading to fast and accurate diagnoses. Peptides also have the flexibility to utilize different chelators, radioisotopes, and radionuclides dependent on the specificity of the target.20 An example of the advantageous nature of peptide-based PET imaging agents was demonstrated in a recent study of ∼130 patients with epithelial neoplasms.44 [68Ga] DOTATATE detected 95.1% of lesions, CT scans detected 45.3%, and other forms of CT/MRI only detected 30.9% of tumors.44 These peptide-based PET imaging agents exhibit favorable characteristics such as high binding specificity and low toxicity, and although concerns about in vivo stability are valid, developments have been made to address these concerns. Many modifications to the peptide backbone have been explored that not only increase the stability of the peptide backbone against proteolytic cleavage but also sustain the high binding efficiency to the target biomolecules41,45−47 (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
(Top) General application of a peptide-based molecular probe with an imaging or therapeutic radioisotope. These probes can be modified for many purposes. Shown is the schematic of a generic probe with each section color coded. (Bottom) For each section, two different modifications are shown to highlight the diversity of possible combinations.
In this review, new peptide-based PET imaging agents and their efficacy are explored, specifically radiometal-based imaging agents. Binding efficiencies as well as tumor-to-cell uptake ratios and percentage of detected tumors are compared with other traditional methods of imaging as well as explore other factors such as stability and half-life. Methods and techniques to increase the stability of the peptide backbone, such as using d-amino acids and PEGylation, as well as their effect on binding efficiency are explored. Finally, potential areas of improvement and growth are explored. We limited our scope to work from the last 3 years to maximize the current state of the field.
2. Peptide Screening Process
The process of identifying and developing a peptide candidate for either therapeutic or diagnostic purposes (or, at times, both) is not one that is always straightforward. Target tumor cells are selected based on unique or overexpressed receptors that can distinguish tumor cells from healthy cells. Peptide candidates can then be developed in silico, based on known structures with binding affinities to the overexpressed receptors or proteins, to confirm affinity and stability using programs such as Schrödinger or VMD (Virtual Molecular Dynamics).48−50 Peptide candidates can then be synthesized and tested in vitro and in vivo with a chelator bound using cell lines and animal models. Another screening method is using phage display technology, involving the use of bacteriophages, each with a unique peptide conformation, to rapidly screen and select peptides with favorable binding properties through iterative rounds of binding, washing, and amplification.51 A diverse peptide library can be made of synthetic or naturally derived peptides, each unique with mutations and alterations made to the peptide sequence to test for enhanced binding affinity to the target receptor or protein.
3. Chelators
An important aspect to explore when identifying potential peptide PET imaging agents is the chelator being used to bind to the radioisotope. Chelators are an important component of radiopharmaceuticals as they build a stable link between the radioisotope and the peptide, allowing the peptide to be tagged when using PET imaging.52,53 Each radioisotope has its own physical properties that determine how suitable a chelator may be, properties such as half-life, size, and chemical stability.52,54 In Table 1, chelators discussed in this review are listed as well as newer species that have not yet been widely implemented in peptide PET imaging; in addition, the radioisotope it binds and the peptides they are attached to are given. When developing a PET imaging agent, the type of chelator used must be considered, as different chelators have different properties best suited to different situations. These chelators are evaluated based on their thermodynamic stability, ability to form metal complexes, and the lack of interference the chelator has on the peptide’s ability to bind its target.
Table 1. Commonly used Chelators and Radioisotopes.

3.1. DOTA, NOTA, and Their Derivatives
DOTA and NOTA, as well as their derivatives, are well-known chelators that still see a large amount of use in the field of peptide PET imaging. DOTA, 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid, and NOTA, 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid, can bind to a range of radioisotopes, making them favorable chelators for PET imaging (Table 1), and its derivatives bind strongly to 68Ga, one of the more cost-effective radioisotopes, while NOTA and NOTA derivatives are more commonly used to bind 64Cu and show higher in vitro cellular uptake in certain proteins.55
3.2. DFO: N-[5-[[4-[5-[Acetyl(hydroxy)amino]pentylamino]-4-oxobutanoyl]-hydroxyamino]pentyl]-N′-(5-aminopentyl)-N′-hydroxybutanediamide
DFO is the most common chelator for 89Zr, as it can strongly bind 89Zr at room temperature with a high radiochemical yield.56 Because 89Zr has a much higher half-life (approximately 3 days) compared to other commonly used radioisotopes, DFO as a chelator is an important component of 89Zr-peptide-based PET imaging agents. Different modifications to the DFO backbone, such as DFOSq, the squaramide ester of DFO, have been explored to yield more stable metal complexes.57
3.3. THP: Tris(hydroxypyridinone)
Tris(hydroxypyridinone), or THP, has seen recent use in PET imaging. THP is a chelator that binds to 68Ga and offers advantages over other 68Ga chelators such as DOTA. The radiochemical synthesis of THP PET imaging agents is significantly faster and requires less demanding conditions and chemical processes compared to the DOTA equivalents. One study compares THP-TATE with DOTA-TATE, showing comparable specific activities (14.4 ± 0.8% ID g–1 vs 11.5 ± 0.6% ID g–1),58 with high-quality images being produced. The simplicity of the labeling process provides faster radiosynthesis and formulation (<2 min).58 THP-TATE and THP-PSMA are two examples of PET imaging agents currently being tested and compared to DOTA and NOTA equivalents, but there is still future potential for more THP-based peptide PET imaging agents to be developed.
3.4. HBED-CC: N,N′-Bis-[2-hydroxy-5-(carboxyethyl)benzyl]ethylenediamine-N,N′-diacetic Acid
HBED-CC is an acyclic, bifunctional compound used mainly for radiolabeling with 68Ga. HBED-CC forms a very stable complex in vivo with 68Ga and has a rapid and efficient labeling process at room temperature. One study compared the 68Ga-HBED-CC-WL12 peptide PET imaging agent with other chelators, showing great image quality and advantages in evaluating the immune microenvironment, with excellent imaging quality in the first 20 min followed by continuous tumor uptake through 180 min.59 HBED-CC chelator has begun to see more use in peptide PET imaging agents, although it is still expensive to synthesize, thus making it commercially limited. However, a new study has found a cost-effective method to synthesize HBED-CC derivatives with high purity and yield, allowing for more widescale use in peptide PET imaging agent development.60
3.5. Versatile and Modifiable Diphosphine Chelators
A new study explores the use of two diphosphine chelators, 2,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)maleic anhydride (DPPh) and 2,3-bis(di-p-tolylphosphino)maleic anhydride (DPTol), with 64Cu and 99mTC as binding radioisotopes for both PET and SPECT imaging.61 Both DPPh and DpTol readily bind to the primary amine groups of the RGD and PSMAt peptide, peptides commonly used in PET imaging. Both chelator–peptide complexes possess favorable properties for use as receptor-targeted imaging agents, exhibiting high stability in vitro as well as a radiochemical yield of above 95%. The phosphine substituents of both chelators can also be modified to increase chelator reactivity with the metal radioisotope as well as the radiotracer hydrophilicity for less off-target retention, introducing hydrophilic substituents that allow for clear rapid circulation.61 Faster circulation allows for less radioactivity in nontarget, healthy tissues, which contributes to a higher contrast image. Both DPPh and DPTol look to be promising chelator candidates for future peptide PET imaging use.
4. 68Ga as a Radioisotope
68Ga is often used as a radioisotope along with chelating agents such as DOTA and NOTA. It decays with a half-life of 67.6 min and a positron yield of 89.1%, allowing for a sufficient amount of time to undergo PET imaging and obtain usable results.62 Although the half-life is not as long as other radioisotopes, one advantage that 68Ga has is availability. Unlike other radioisotopes, 68Ga can be produced without a conventional cyclotron but rather by the use of a 68Ge/68Ga generator, which are commercially available.62,63 Peptide-based PET imaging agents using 68Ga as a radioisotope also report low to no toxicity to human patients.64−66
4.1. KDKPPR Peptide Coupled with Gallium-68 for Detection of Brain Metastases
Angiogenesis is a key mechanism in tumor growth.67−69 A key mediator of angiogenesis is the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors (VEGFR).68,70,71 One potential target protein, neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), acts as a coreceptor to VEGF and is overexpressed in many cancers including brain72 and breast cancer.73 Peptides with binding capabilities to NRP-1 have been synthesized for their use as PET imaging agents/therapies. One promising peptide sequence, KDKPPR, coupled with a bifunctional chelator for 68Ga anchoring, NODAGA, showed promise as a possible imaging agent.74 Binding assay data taken from surface plasmon resonance (SPR) experiments show a high affinity for NRP-1, and in vivo studies show that uptake in a brain model of metastasis in a nude rat was 7.6 times higher compared to the surrounding healthy brain. Standard uptake values (SUV) show a difference of 0.61 versus 0.08 SUVmean for the tumor and healthy brain after 1 h of injection of [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-KDKPPR in rat subjects.74 Using an endothelial cell line (HUVEC) and the MDA-MB-231 cancer line, no toxicity was observed from the KDKPPR peptide in the range of 0–10 μM 4 and 24 h after exposure.74 [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-KDKPPR shows promising results both in vitro and in vivo.
4.2. NTS1R 68Ga-PET Imaging Agent Targeting Overexpressed NTS Receptors in Tumor Cells
Neurotensin is a 13 amino acid peptide neurotransmitter in the central nervous system whose physiological activity is mediated by three receptors, NST receptor 1 (NST1R) along with NST2R and NST3R.75 NST1R has been seen to be specifically expressed in certain types of tumors,76 making it a promising target for PET imaging. In one study, different peptide sequences based on the 13 amino acid sequence of the neurotensin peptide were synthesized and compared. [68Ga]UR-LS130 ([68Ga]56) showed the highest in vivo stability and tumor to background ratio among other peptides tested and a high affinity for binding to NST1R.77 Dynamic PET scans (PET scans registering tracer kinetics and data over time78) also showed a clear tumor visualization in in vivo studies, confirming [68Ga]56 as a potential PET imaging agent for NST1R. The [68Ga]56 peptide (sequence of MRRPYIL) showed high stability estimated to be partly due to a β–β dimethylated tyrosine (Figure 2) that decreases the rate of enzymatic cleavage,79 a modification not seen in the other peptide candidates. [68Ga]56 also showed a tumor to background ratio of 16 ± 2.2% ID/g, the highest value among the other candidates.77
Figure 2.

UR-LS130 peptide with an amino acid structure of MRRPYIL. The Tyr residue has a β–β demethylated R group which was found to have the highest in vivo stability and afforded a high tumor-to-muscle ratio.
4.3. [68Ga]DOTA Peptides and [18F]FDG in the Evaluation of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are epithelial neoplasms that occur in various organs but more frequently in the endocrine and nervous systems. An increase in the prevalence of these tumors leaves these NENs as viable targets for diagnostic methods and imaging.80 Most NENs express somatostatin receptors (SSTR) which are used as targets for radionuclide imaging.44,81 Three [68Ga]DOTA peptides, DOTA-TOC, DOTA-NOC, and DOTA-TATE, have been developed and recently used in clinical practice as imaging agents.44,62 Each of these radiopeptides binds to various subtypes of SSTR, allowing these [68Ga]DOTA peptides a wider capacity of imaging when compared to other conventional methods.
A study of 131 GEP-NENs patients shows that around 40% of the lesions detected by [68Ga]DOTA-TATE PET/CT were missed on conventional imaging methods, including CT scans and MRI (Figure 3).44 Along with the ability to bind with a range of SSTR subtypes, [68Ga]DOTA peptides can also be used alongside [18F]FDG in a complementary role. Well-differentiated tumors tend to have a higher affinity toward [68Ga]DOTA peptides with poorly differentiated tumors tending to have a higher affinity toward [18F]FDG than [68Ga]DOTA peptides.44,82 In well-differentiated tumors, SSTR expression is increased with a decrease in glycolytic activity and vice versa in poorly differentiated tumors,44,83 allowing for the use of [68Ga]DOTA peptide PET imaging along with [18F]FDG PET imaging for whole body characterization of tumor heterogeneity in GEP-NENs patients.
Figure 3.
PET/CT Imaging of NENs using 68Ga-DOTA-NOC (A, B) and 18F-FDG (C). With the 68Ga-DOTA-NOC imaging agent, we see three distinct areas of increased radiotracer uptake (indicated by the blue and white arrows in A and B, respectively) but no increased uptake of the 18F-FDG (C). Reprinted with permission from ref (43). Copyright 2003 Oxford Academic.
4.4. [68Ga]GP12 Peptide PET Imaging Agent To Detect TIGIT Overexpression in Tumor Cells
An emerging target for peptide PET imaging agents is the T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains or “TIGIT”. TIGIT has been found to be expressed on many types of T cells, including tumor-infiltrating T cells, regulatory T cells, and helper T cells, which are overexpressed in the tumor microenvironment.84,85 Earlier studies utilized antibody-based TIGIT agents for PET imaging with 89Zr and 64Cu86 however with mixed results due to the stability of the protein and the sustainability of the synthesis process. A 12 amino acid peptide [68Ga]GP12 (GGYTGFWHRLNP) was synthesized with a NOTA group to allow for radiolabeling with 68Ga. It showed a high affinity and specificity for TIGIT and demonstrated the capacity for PET imaging in both in vivo and ex vivo studies.87 Compared to other peptide candidates, [68Ga]GP12 showed the highest tumor uptake values (2.76 ± 0.68% ID/g) along with the highest tumor to background ratio of 12.94 ± 2.64 in in vivo studies.87 In nonsmall lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, trial runs of the [68Ga]GP12 peptide showed similar PET images of primary and metastatic lesions as those produced by [18F]FDG PET imaging.87 The tumor uptake percentage of [68Ga]GP12 (SUVmax = 4.82) was less than that of [18F]FDG (SUVmax = 9.45).87
4.5. [68Ga]DOTA-TBP-3 Peptide as a PET Imaging Agent To Detect TIGIT Overexpression in Tumor Cells
Another study uses [68Ga]GP12 NOTA as a base to develop a simpler yet effective peptide imaging agent. The synthesis of a [68Ga]DOTA-TBP-3 peptide was based on the d-peptide DTBP-3, which was found to effectively block TIGIT interaction with other ligands.88 Western blot analysis showed a tumor uptake of 8.41 ± 1.22% in high TIGIT expressing cells and 2.56 ± 0.19% in low TIGIT expressing cells after 30 min.89 [68Ga]DOTA-TBP-3 was also found to noninvasively detect TIGIT expression in tumor bearing mice, showing a tumor to background ratio of 5.20 ± 0.16.89 This peptide serves as a specific imaging agent for detecting TIGIT expression in vivo and has many promising inhibitory functions based on its tumor uptake and binding to the target protein.
4.6. 68Ga Conclusion
68Ga provides a reliable and cost-effective method to radiolabel peptides for use in PET imaging. Its availability through a 68Ge/68Ga generator and ability to bind multiple commonly used chelators provide researchers with easy access to radioisotopes for in vitro studies.90 Multiple 68Ga-based peptide PET imaging agents have recently passed FDA approval for use, such as [68Ga]PSMA-11 and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC.62,91 New studies are also emerging that identify 68Ga peptide PET imaging agents as cancer receptor antagonists, showing high specific binding to cancer receptors.90,92,93 This could lead to the development of highly specific peptides with both imaging and therapeutic capabilities.
5. 64Cu as a Radioisotope
64Cu is often used as a radioisotope along with the chelators NOTA and DOTA, much like 68Ga. Unlike 68Ga, 64Cu has a much longer half-life at around 12.7 h, although with a lower positron yield at around 18% (39% beta emission, 43% Auger electron emission).94,95 Similarly, it is not as commercially available, as it must be synthesized via reactor-based and accelerator-based methods.94 However, 64Cu does have certain advantages, namely, a longer half-life, allowing for longer imaging as well as identifying tumor kinetics, and the potential to be a targeted radionuclide therapy due to the multiple decay modes.94
5.1. CM-2 Peptide with DOTA 64Cu for PET Imaging of CD133 Protein Expressed in Multiple Cancers
CD133 is a transmembrane protein recognized as a prominent marker for tumor cells because it is highly expressed in many human cancer types. Importantly, it is found in tumor progenitor cells known as cancer stem cells (CSCs),96,97 which have been shown to drive tumor initiation and relapse, making them an excellent target for therapies.98 CSCs maintain a high level of resistance to conventional therapies as well as detection methods due to their high adaptive abilities against harmful conditions98 and heterogeneous nature among different tumor types.96,99 The role of CD133 in tumor progression is not entirely known, yet its expression in many types of tumors makes it a promising biomarker for imaging and therapy. The peptide [64Cu]CM-2 (sequence Ahx-CWRLRWHSPLKGM-OH, Figure 4) was synthesized with the chelator DOTA for 64Cu labeling. This peptide, based on the structure of the CD133 binding peptide CM-1, includes a 6-aminohexanoic acid (Ahx) linker between the peptide N terminus and the DOTA for increased peptide stability,96,100 a prevalent issue with the CM-1 peptide. [64Cu]CM-2 retains the high binding specificity to the Cd133 protein seen with the CM-1 peptide while also increasing the stability (22.4% and 20.1% intact CM-1 vs 94.9% and 91.9% intact CM-2 after 1 and 2 h in mouse serum). Ex vivo studies confirm the PET imaging capabilities of the [64Cu]CM-2 peptide, showing tumor uptakes of 3.77%, 4.23%, 6.89%, and 6.19% ID/g at 1, 2, 6, and 18 h.96 Furthermore, there was a significant decrease in tumor uptake when running the [64Cu]CM-2 peptide with excess antiCD133 antibody, suggesting a specificity toward CD133 uptake in the tumors. [64Cu]CM-2 introduced very effective changes that boosted stability while retaining a high affinity for CD133 and has a half-life that can be used for effective PET imaging.
Figure 4.
Structure of CM-2 peptide. CM-2 contains a 6-aminohexanoic acid linker group between the DOTA chelator and the peptide backbone. This linker has shown an increase in in vivo stability when compared to non-Ahx CM-2 peptides.
5.2. [64Cu]WL12 Peptides Targeting Programmed Death Ligand PDL1
Programmed death ligand 1 is expressed on tumor and inflammatory cells and is representative of immune checkpoint pathways negatively regulating T-cell function and inhibiting antitumor immunity.101,102 PD-L1 has thus become a popular target for cancer therapy and PET imaging agents. Computational studies show similar interaction sites between PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies and a high-affinity PD-L1 binding peptide, WL12. WL12 (sequence AcYMeANPHLHypWSW(Me)MeNIe-MeNIe, Figure 5) was synthesized with a NOTA group to allow for 64Cu binding.103−105 In vivo studies show rapid uptake in PD-L1-positive tumors with tumor uptake values of 34.4 ± 3.1% and 24.2 ± 2.5% ID/g in the kidneys and liver. The tumor to background ratio for PD-L1-positive tumors was 25.6 ± 1.9, showing the consistent ability of [64Cu]WL12 to provide clear PET images with high signal-to-noise ratios.106 [64Cu]WL12 identified variable and dynamic changes in PD-L1 expression and has a slightly lower binding affinity than PD-L1 antibodies, ensuring that [64Cu]WL12 as a PET imaging agent does not interfere with the therapeutic efficacy of PD-L1 antibodies and therapies.103,104
Figure 5.

Use of the [64Cu]WL12 peptide to image tumor PD-L1 expression in vivo. This figure shows NSG mice with hPD-L1 (red arrow) and CHO tumors (blue arrow) being intravenously given 150 μCi of the [64Cu]WL12 tracer. Images were taken 10, 30, 60, and 120 min after injection. Specific accumulation of [64Cu]WL12 is shown. Reprinted with permission from ref (99). Copyright 2008 Springer Nature.
5.3. 64Cu-Labeled Biterminally PEGylated Peptides Targeting Integrin αvβ6
Epithelial-specific integrin ανβ6 is upregulated in many cancers and is directly associated with tumor progression.107 It is particularly upregulated during tumorigenesis and can serve as a prognostic marker for imaging and therapeutics.107,108 Various peptides with specificity to integrin ανβ6 have been synthesized with one in particular garnering much attention as a possible PET imaging agent, A20FMDV2.108,109 This 20 amino acid peptide (NAVPNLRGDLQVLAQKVART) showed preferential binding to integrin ανβ6 and was initially labeled with 18F. However, in vivo studies showed rapid levels of excretion as well as metabolic breakdown of the peptide.108 Thus, the A20FMDV2 (Figure 6) peptide was synthesized with a DOTA and PCTA group for 64Cu binding, allowing for an easier synthesis and longer half-life.110
Figure 6.

SARTATE peptide structure. [64Cu]SARTATE utilizes the MeCOSar chelator for 64Cu binding. The phenylalanine and tryptophan amino acid residues are in the d configuration, a technique to increase peptide stability. A S–S bridge is also seen between the two cystine residues.
The PCTA/DOTA [64Cu]A20FMDV2 peptides were biterminally PEGylated, allowing for a more stable peptide and retaining a high affinity to integrin ανβ6 (PCTA 98.9% at 24 h in human serum and 62.4 ± 3.7 KD to integrin ανβ6/DOTA 100% at 24 h in human serum and 60.4 ± 6.7 KD to integrin ανβ6).108 In vivo studies show that the tumor uptake of [64Cu]Cu-PCTA-PEG282-A20FMDV2 (3.86 ± 0.58% ID/g) was higher than that of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-PEG282-A20FMDV2 (2.12 ± 0.83% ID/g) at 1 h.108 Small animal PET imaging also shows good tumor uptake for both peptides with [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-PEG282-A20FMDV2 showing a SUVmax of 0.44 ± 0.02 at 1 h and a steady increase to 0.69 ± 0.09 at 24 h compared to [64Cu]Cu-PCTA-PEG282-A20FMDV2 showing a SUVmax of 0.46 ± 0.04 at 1 h and a steady increase to 0.74 ± 0.21 at 24 h.108
Compared to the initial integrin ανβ6 binding peptide with the 18F group, both [64Cu] A20FMDV2 peptides show better stability in human serum (from 72.5% to 98.9/100% after 1 h in human serum) and slightly better tumor uptake (from 2.64% to 2.12/3.86% ID/g).108,111 [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-PEG282-A20FMDV2 shows the most promising stability and tumor uptake data and has potential use as a PET imaging agent instead of the current 18F imaging agents.
5.4. [64Cu]SARTATE PET Imaging for Neuroendocrine Tumors
Conventional [68Ga]DOTA peptides (including DOTA-TATE) are commonly used for neuroendocrine neoplasia diagnosis and imaging.44,112 The high sensitivity for tumor cells and the efficiency of PET scans have made this peptide the gold standard for PET imaging for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs).112,113 However, one limitation that arises with the use of these [68Ga]DOTA peptides is the half-life of the radiotracer. Since 68Ga has a half-life of around 68 min, this does not give sufficient time to model the retention kinetics in individual patients, especially for cases that require significant clearance over time, such as the kidneys and liver.114,115 This may also give rise to cases where lesions are not reported simply due to decay of the radiotracer.115 [64Cu]SARTATE is an alternative peptide based on [68Ga]DOTA-TATE that was recently proposed (Figure 7). It has the sequence Tyr3FCFWKTCT-OH with the chelator MeCOSar for 64Cu binding.114 In vivo studies comparing the effectiveness of [64Cu]SARTATE to the commonly used [68Ga]DOTATATE show that [64Cu]SARTATE was more effective at targeting lesions in patients with a mean SUVmax of 23.61 for [68Ga]DOTATATE compared to a mean SUVmax of 33.32 for [64Cu]SARTATE among the 10 patients in the study.114 [64Cu]SARTATE also showed high tumor uptake values in organs that require a longer clearance over time (3.49% ID/g at 24 h in kidneys and 6.79% ID/g at 24 h in the liver).114 [64Cu]SARTATE was well tolerated throughout the study and exhibited high lesion uptake and retention. Compared to conventional methods, [64Cu]SARTATE showed comparable and/or superior lesion detection in all patients, more so in the liver. The longer half-life of 64Cu also provides the opportunity to study the binding kinetics and retention at a longer period of time. The [64Cu]SARTATE peptide was found to be a safe and effective imaging agent with high specificity and retention in tumor cells.114,116
Figure 7.

l/d-Amino acid comparison.
5.5. 64Cu Conclusion
64Cu provides a different approach to PET imaging compared to other radioisotopes. The longer half-life and multiple forms of decay allow it to be used in many applications other than imaging, such as pharmacokinetics and theranostics.95,117,118 Although 64Cu production is more cumbersome than other radioisotopes, many 64Cu peptide PET imaging agents are currently undergoing human studies119,120 with the potential of FDA approval.
6. Other Metals as Radioisotopes
Other metals have seen use as radiotracers for peptide PET imaging. [89Zr] exhibits a long half-life (78.4 h), and its positron emissions produce high-resolution PET images.4289Zr benefits from its long half-life when used in immuno-PET imaging, specifically tracking the target tumor over a longer course of time to characterize tumor heterogeneity, monitoring therapeutic response, and assessing possible disease recurrence.121 DFO is the most commonly used chelator; however, studies show that there is evidence of dissociation in vivo and free 89Zr in bone.42,57 Another metal that has seen promising results is 44Sc. This radiotracer has a shorter half-life, at 3.97 h, but is more suited for targeting smaller molecules.122 Due to its nature, 44Sc has a high-energy γ-radiation that is suitable for β + γ coincidence PET imaging, an extension of standard PET imaging that combines β and γ emissions for a more precise scan with a lower administered dose.123
6.1. 89Zr-Labeled Inhibitor of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for PET Imaging in Prostate Cancer
Current applications of PET/CT imaging use 68Ga- or 18F-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands to target tumors localized in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.124,125 However, an estimated 20% of cases show undetected tumors using conventional methods for PSMA PET imaging126 with an estimated 5–10% of primary prostate cancers not expressing PSMA and different tumors exhibiting different expressions of PSMA-positive cells.127 To address this, a new PSMA binding peptide imaging agent was synthesized that exploits the longer half-life of Zr-89;12889Zr -PSMA-DFO has a tranexamic acid-ADEuK backbone with N-succinimidedesferrioxamine (N-sucDf) for 89Zr binding. Using in vivo data, the binding affinity of 89Zr DFO was found to be comparable to conventional imaging agents in normal PSMA expressive tumors (89Zr–Zr-PSMA-DFO at 4.97 ± 0.57 vs 5.15 ± 0.60 for conventional 68Ga Ga-PSMA-11).128 Tumor uptake experiments show comparable data between the two imaging agents with 89Zr Zr-PSMA-DFO showing a tumor uptake value of 26.3 ± 5.3% ID/g after 2 h in tumor containing xenografts compared to 19.4 ± 2.4% ID/g after 2 h for 68Ga Ga-PSMA-11.128 Due to the long half-life of 89Zr, tumor imaging remained visible over a period of 48 h. 89Zr–Zr–PSMA-DFO showed no inferiority compared to other conventional antibody methods and can serve as a potential imaging agent and tool to run kinetics studies on PSMA tumor cells due to the favorable physical characteristics of 89Zr.
6.2. [44Sc]Sc-NODAGA-AMBA as a PET Probe for Preclinical Imaging of GRPR-Positive Prostate Cancer Cells
44Sc is an attractive radioisotope with a higher half-life than 68Ga (3.97 h vs 67.6 min) and a higher positron yield than 64Cu (94.7% vs 18%).122,129,130 Because of these decay characteristics, studies have been done to quantify the use of 44Sc as a replacement for 68Ga and 64Cu. A recent study compared the [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-AMBA peptide with [44Sc]Sc-NODAGA-AMBA.130 These PET imaging peptides are based on the bombesin peptide (sequence of p-EQRLGNQWAVGHLM-NH2131). This peptide exhibits high binding affinity to gastrin-releasing peptide receptors which are overexpressed in prostate cancer.132,133 NODAGA was used to allow for both 44Sc and 68Ga binding. Ex vivo studies show a higher tumor uptake for [44Sc]Sc-NODAGA-AMBA (4.56 ± 0.45% ID/g at 1 h) compared to [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-AMBA (3.78 ± 0.93% ID/g) as well as higher cellular uptake (5.65 ± 0.95 at 1 h vs 4.11 ± 0.79 at 1 h in receptor-positive PC-3 cells).130 PET imaging studies show a SUVmean value of 6.16 ± 1.24 for [44Sc]Sc-NODAGA-AMBA vs a SUVmean value of 5.50 ± 0.54 for [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-AMBA 1 h after injection.130 [44Sc]Sc-NODAGA-AMBA showed high binding affinity to GRPR-positive PC-3 prostate cancer cells, favorable radiotracer properties, and promising PET characteristics compared to conventional 68Ga methods.
7. Methods To Enhance the Stability of the Peptide Backbone
One of the major challenges in developing peptide-based PET imaging agents is the stability of the peptide backbone in vivo. Peptides may exhibit a high binding efficiency to target cells/proteins, but they can be susceptible to proteases. To combat low in vivo stability, certain modifications to the peptide backbone and/or the amino acids have been explored. These can be used to increase the stability of peptide-based PET imaging agents. Enhancing the stability of the peptide allows for prolonged exposure to the target protein, ensuring a higher uptake rate. Having the peptide remain stable for as long as or longer than the half-life of the radioisotope can also result in clearer and more efficient PET scans and be more cost effective as the peptide degrading is no longer a limitation.
7.1. Stapled Peptides as Scaffolds for Peptide PET Imaging Agents
Stapled peptides are modified peptides with the aim of addressing the inherent challenges presented by peptide-based therapeutics and diagnostics. The development of stapled peptides involves introducing hydrocarbon bridges, or staples, across one or two helical turns of the peptide. Stapled peptides show an improvement in in vivo stability, cell permeability, and target binding affinity.134
In recent years, there have been new studies exploring the use of stapled peptides as diagnostic tools. One study explores the development of a chromogranin A-derived peptide, peptide 5a, that binds to αvβ6 and αvβ8 with high affinity as well as exhibits inhibitory behavior of cell -mediated TGFβ activation, important in the inhibition of αvβ6-positive tumors.135 Peptide 5a-NOTA showed high radiochemical purity, >95%, as well as a high specific activity and good stability after 4 h at room temperature. The study also showed the possible therapeutic potential of peptide 5a as tumor uptake of 5a-NOTA 2 h post injection was almost completely inhibited by prior administration of excess 5a.135
7.2. Effect of l- to d-Amino acid Substitution on Stability and Activity of Antitumor peptide RDP215
One possible strategy to enhance the proteolytic stability of peptides is the substitution of l-amino acids with d-amino acids. l-Amino acids are commonly found in the human body and are the natural targets of enzymes and proteases, while d-amino acids are their enantiomeric counterparts which are present in trace amounts in humans136 (Figure 8). Because the l-enantiomer makes up a significantly larger fraction found in nature, proteases are less likely to recognize the d-counterpart, making them highly resistant to degradation and cleavage.137−139
Figure 8.

Cyclic RGD pentapeptide.
Two cationic peptides with tumor binding capabilities, RDP215 (sequence H-FWRIRIRR-P-RRIRIRWF-NH2) and the d-amino acid variant 9D-RDP215 (sequence H-fWrIrIrr-P-rrIrIrWr-NH2; lowercase represents d-amino acids), were developed and exposed to negatively charged phosphatidylserine (PS) cells, which mimic the cell membrane of certain cancer cells, e.g., melanoma and glioblastoma cells.46,140 Both peptides were found to retain the specificity for cancer mimicking PS cells. However, the introduction of d-amino acids showed an increase in peptide stability in various ex vivo and in vitro studies.141−143 Ex vivo studies show no degradation of 9D-RDP215 after a 7 day incubation in the presence of human serum, whereas RDP215 showed degradation after incubation for 1 day in the same conditions.46 The d-peptide was found to remain effective and stable longer compared to the l-peptide variant. One drawback is the potential toxicity introduced with d-amino acids. 9D-RDP215 shows higher toxicity than RDP215 against non-neoplastic cells; however, 9D-RDP215 requires a much smaller amount to achieve a high killing efficacy compared with the l-amino acid variant.46 The smaller amount needed mitigated the risk from the higher toxicity level of the 9D-RDP215 peptide.
7.3. Cyclic Peptides for Enhanced Stability and Cell Penetration
Cyclic peptides are formed by linking the N terminus with the C terminus of the peptide chain to create an amide bond between the amino and the carboxyl termini.144 Cyclization of peptides is a possible route to enhance the stability and affinity for peptide agents as cyclic peptides exhibit favorable properties such as structural rigidity and receptor selectivity.144−147 Along with the structural rigidity of a cyclic peptide, these peptides are not easily recognized by protease enzymes, due to the lack of termini, and are therefore less susceptible to cleavage in vivo.146,148
Wu and Zhang use a cyclic peptide, [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-E[c(RGDfK)2] (sequence RGDfK, Figure 8), as a PET imaging agent for integrin αvβ3 receptors, synthesized with a DOTA group for 64Cu binding. [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-E[c(RGDfK)2] showed high and specific tumor uptake in in vitro studies with a tumor uptake of 4.56 ± 0.51% ID/g after 24 h while also showing a high integrin αvβ3 affinity and long blood circulation time.149,150
7.4. Bicyclic Peptides for Enhanced Stability and Target Retention
Bicyclic peptides are a class of polypeptides containing two macrocyclic rings with greater conformational rigidity and metabolic stability than linear and monocyclic peptides due to the increased rigidity and steric hindrance provided by the presence of two cyclic regions.151 One such bicyclic peptide, DOTA-BCY-C, was found to show impressive affinity to human and mouse MT1-MMP, a tumor-associated membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase, as well as target-dependent binding and internalization in cells with a dissociation constant (KD) of 0.52 ± 0.24 nmol/L and 12% ID/g from in vivo imaging tests.152 Furthermore, BCY-C shows good proteolytic stability with no measurable degradation in mouse and human plasma over the course of 24 h.
7.5. Linkers To Enhance Stability
Linkers are molecules that separate multiple domains in proteins and peptides, space out two molecules to prohibit unwanted interactions, or increase resistance against proteases.41,96,153,154 One example of where linkers increase stability in peptides is the use of a 6-aminohexanoic acid (Ahx) linker, previously mentioned in the [64Cu]CM-2 peptide. This modification increased the stability of the CM-2 peptide when compared to the unmodified CM peptide with 94.9% of the peptide still intact after 1 h of incubation in mouse serum as opposed to 22.4% of the unmodified peptide after 1 h of incubation.96 Other linkers used to increase stability are polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based linkers, favored due to their low toxicity and effect on binding affinity.
8. Future Outlooks
Peptides have many favorable characteristics that make them attractive models for targeted therapies. High binding specificity to a wide variety of targets, a backbone that can be modified to increase stability and affinity, and the ability to attach chelators for PET imaging are some of the reasons peptide-based agents have seen an increase in development and research. Peptide-based PET imaging agents are beginning to gain FDA approval for use in detection of various cancers.155,156 Because of the growing success of the field, new avenues to take advantage of peptide-based PET imaging agents are being explored.
8.1. Peptides as Theranostic Agents
Such avenues include the use of peptide-based molecules as theranostic agents and the use of image-guided therapy to enable both diagnosis and treatment.157 Peptide-based molecules have already demonstrated their use as PET imaging agents, and the favorable characteristics listed above make them attractive models for lower risk therapies. The basis of peptide-based theranostics is to use the imaging component to identify and bind to a target and the therapy agent to treat the identified target with the goal being an enhanced therapy efficacy as well as lowering the risk of adverse effects due to the minimal toxicity of peptide agents.157−159
Radioisotopes used for therapy differ than those used for diagnosis and imaging. Radioisotopes such as 68Ga and 64Cu are evaluated based on their ability to provide clear imaging over a certain period of time and being readily available for use. Radioisotopes used for therapy are evaluated based on, among other things, the decay method and type of emission released.160 Radioisotopes used in therapy and being developed for theranostic use are primarily β-particle or α-particle emitters and Auger electrons.160−162 Radioisotopes such as 177Lu and 86Y/90Y decay through β emission and have the added benefit of binding to DOTA, a common chelator used in peptide PET imaging.163
A classic example of theranostics is the use of both types of radioisotopes with an initial 68Ga-labeled peptide-based agent for diagnosis followed by the same peptide-based agent labeled with 177Lu or 86Y/90Y for peptide–receptor radionuclide therapy.164
One peptide-based theranostic agent that has shown promise in recent clinical trials is [111In]In-CP04, targeting the overexpressed cholecystokinin-2 receptors (CCK2R) on the membrane of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) cells.165−167 The CP04 peptide (sequence (e)6AYGWMDF) is used as a PET imaging agent, showing high tumor uptake in in vitro studies (9.24 ± 1.35% ID/g)168 and PET imaging capabilities,165,169 but has recently been used in studies as a theranostic agent. A favorable biodistribution, tumor uptake, and low toxicity of CP04 peptide labeled with 177Lu show a promising path to a potential theranostic agent.165
8.2. Peptide–Receptor Radionuclide Therapy
Peptide–receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a targeted therapy for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors through the use of radionuclide peptides selectively targeting the cancer cells.170 The radioisotope of choice is usually lutetium-177 or yttrium-90 as the beta particles released by these radioisotopes causes DNA single-strand breaks, leading to cell death. However, actinium-255 also has been used in pilot studies to determine the effectiveness of alpha emitters, providing a targeted alpha therapy as a possible alternative to targeted beta therapy.
A previously mentioned peptide PET imaging agent, [68Ga]DOTATATE, has been used as a theranostic agent for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with overexpressed somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2). Lutathera, [177Lu]DOTATATE, was recently approved by the FDA for treatment of SSTR-positive neuroendocrine tumors.171 The diagnostic characteristics of this peptide were explored earlier, showing a high affinity for binding to SSTR as well as a higher rate of lesion detection than conventional imaging techniques,44 and because of the presence of a chelator that can also bind therapeutic radioisotopes, it has seen use as a theranostic agent. One study using [177Lu]DOTATATE in 35 patients with NETs showed a radiological objective response rate of 9–35% (as complete or partial remission).172,173 Current studies explore the effectiveness of using multiple therapeutic radioisotopes in combination, such as 177Lu with 86Y/90Y-labeled DOTATATE or DOTATOC, and improvements to the peptide backbone for lower toxicity and higher stability.174
[255Ac]Ac-DOTATATE has also seen use in research studies to identify the effectiveness of targeted alpha therapy. One study showed that targeted alpha therapies exhibit advantages over beta therapies, such as less dependence on tumor oxygen levels as well as the ability to break DNA double strands.175 Another study showed a higher objective response rate for [255Ac]Ac-DOTATATE when compared to [177Lu]DOTATATE (50% vs 25%).176 Although these studies show positive results, there is a void in larger scale clinical studies and is a point for future research.
With a better understanding of the activity and function of peptides and the target tumor environment, there is potential for the increased development of theranostic peptide agents with high efficacy and minimal adverse side effects. Clinical studies using radioisotopes with therapeutic characteristics, while not yet at the desired effect, offer an optimistic outlook on the future of theranostic peptide agents, whether that be through using a combination of radioisotopes177 or through developing agents for new targets.178
9. Conclusion
In recent years, peptide PET imaging agents have seen a steady increase in FDA approval,156,179,180 and significant strides have been made in the development of highly specific, stable, and nontoxic peptides for use in diagnosis (Table 2). Peptide therapeutics still suffer from issues such as proteolytic stability and high toxicity; however, research on applying known and newer methods to address these concerns has been highlighted in this review, including bicyclic peptides, stapled peptides, and other modifications. The peptides discussed in this review are just some of the many peptides developed in recent years. Different radioisotopes with different chelators along with different methods to increase stability, affinity, and lower toxicity are being developed for a wide variety of targets. Positive results in clinical trials also provide a positive outlook on the future of peptide PET imaging with many peptide-based molecules being developed as theranostic agents.
Table 2. Peptide PET Imaging Agents.
| imaging agent | amino acid sequence | target protein |
|---|---|---|
| [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-KDKPPR | KDKPPR | neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) |
| [68Ga]UR-LS130 | MRRPYIL | neurotensin 1 receptor (NST1R) |
| [68Ga]DOTA-TOC | fCYwKTCT | somatostatin receptors (SSTR) |
| [68Ga]DOTA-NOC | fCFwKTCT | somatostatin receptors (SSTR) |
| [68Ga]DOTA-TATE | fCYwKTCT | somatostatin receptors (SSTR) |
| [68Ga]GP12 | GGYTGFWHRLNP | T-cell immunoreceptors (TIGIT) |
| [64Cu]CM2 | Ahx-CWRLRWHSPLKGM | CD133 transmembrane protein |
| [64Cu]WL12 | cyc(AcYMeANPHLHypWSW(Me)MeNIe-MeNIe) | programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1) |
| [64Cu]PCTA/DOTA | NAVPNLRGDLQVLAQKVART | epithelial-specific integrin ανβ6 |
| [64Cu]SARTATE | Tyr3FCFWKTCT | neuroendocrine neoplasms |
| [64Cu]DOTA-DPA | fhyqrdtpkstn | programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1) |
| [44Sc]Sc-NODAGA-AMBA | EQRLGNQWAVGHLM | gastrin-releasing peptide receptors |
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Oluwatayo Ikotun for her guidance on this manuscript.
Glossary
Vocabulary
- PET imaging
peptide positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is a molecular imaging technique wherein radiolabeled peptides or peptide–chelator complexes are bound to radioisotope to visualize and quantify biological processes at the molecular level
- metal radioisotopes
metal radioisotopes are radioactive forms of metal atoms that decay and emit radiation. Usually for PET imaging the radiation type is beta plus decay wherein a proton is converted into a neutron, releasing a positron and electron neutrino. The interaction between the positron and an electron releases γ-rays, which are detected using scintillation cameras
- peptide theranostics
peptide theranostics is the use of peptide-based molecules for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Peptide theranostic agents are designed to bind to disease-associated targets and provide precise localization via imaging techniques such as PET as well as having therapeutic properties via mechanism inhibition or delivering therapeutic agents directly to the target
- stapled peptides
stapled peptides are modified to address the inherent challenges presented by peptide-based therapeutics and diagnostics. The development of stapled peptides involves introducing hydrocarbon bridges, or staples, across one or two helical turns of the peptide
- alpha therapy
alpha therapy is the use of use of alpha particles for therapeutic use. Alpha particles have a short wavelength but very high linear energy transfer, leading to high damage to nearby cells with minimal impact on surrounding tissues
Author Contributions
Research and review: M.S and L.S. Paper preparation and editing: M.S and L.S.
This work was supported by George Mason University and the state of Virginia.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Rajwa P.; Pfister D.; Rieger C.; Heidenreich J.; Drzezga A.; Persigehl T.; Shariat S. F.; Heidenreich A. Importance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET-CT in Patients Treated with Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer. Prostate 2023, 83 (4), 385–391. 10.1002/pros.24470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobson F. L.; Van den Abbeele A. D. Importance of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for Detection of Cancer. Radiology 2022, 303 (1), 200–201. 10.1148/radiol.212884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morigi J. J.; Anderson J.; Fanti S. Promise of PET Imaging in Prostate Cancer: Improvement or Waste of Money?. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2020, 30 (1), 9. 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van de Donk P. P.; Oosting S. F.; Knapen D. G.; van der Wekken A. J.; Brouwers A. H.; Lub-de Hooge M. N.; de Groot D.-J. A.; de Vries E. G. Molecular Imaging to Support Cancer Immunotherapy. J. Immunother Cancer 2022, 10 (8), e004949 10.1136/jitc-2022-004949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lother D.; Robert M.; Elwood E.; Smith S.; Tunariu N.; Johnston S. R. D.; Parton M.; Bhaludin B.; Millard T.; Downey K.; Sharma B. Imaging in Metastatic Breast Cancer, CT, PET/CT, MRI, WB-DWI, CCA: Review and New Perspectives. Cancer Imaging 2023, 23 (1), 53. 10.1186/s40644-023-00557-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zugni F.; Padhani A. R.; Koh D.-M.; Summers P. E.; Bellomi M.; Petralia G. Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging (WB-MRI) for Cancer Screening in Asymptomatic Subjects of the General Population: Review and Recommendations. Cancer Imaging 2020, 20 (1), 34. 10.1186/s40644-020-00315-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schima W.; Böhm G.; Rösch C. S.; Klaus A.; Függer R.; Kopf H. Mass-Forming Pancreatitis versus Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: CT and MR Imaging for Differentiation. Cancer Imaging 2020, 20 (1), 52. 10.1186/s40644-020-00324-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guimarães M. D.; Noschang J.; Teixeira S. R.; Santos M. K.; Lederman H. M.; Tostes V.; Kundra V.; Oliveira A. D.; Hochhegger B.; Marchiori E. Whole-Body MRI in Pediatric Patients with Cancer. Cancer Imaging 2017, 17 (1), 6. 10.1186/s40644-017-0107-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peng F. Recent Advances in Cancer Imaging with 64CuCl2 PET/CT. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2022, 56 (2), 80–85. 10.1007/s13139-022-00738-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vikram R.; Iyer R. B. PET/CT Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Follow-up of Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Imaging 2008, 8, S46–S51. 10.1102/1470-7330.2008.9009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- García-Figueiras R.; Baleato-González S.; Padhani A. R.; Luna-Alcalá A.; Vallejo-Casas J. A.; Sala E.; Vilanova J. C.; Koh D.-M.; Herranz-Carnero M.; Vargas H. A. How Clinical Imaging Can Assess Cancer Biology. Insights into Imaging 2019, 10 (1), 28. 10.1186/s13244-019-0703-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manganaro L.; Gigli S.; Antonelli A.; Saldari M.; Tomao F.; Marchetti C.; Anastasi E.; Laghi A. Imaging Strategy in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Practical Review. Abdom Radiol 2019, 44 (3), 1091–1102. 10.1007/s00261-018-1677-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gravestock P.; Somani B. K.; Tokas T.; Rai B. P. A Review of Modern Imaging Landscape for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Clinical Guide. J. Clin Med. 2023, 12 (3), 1186. 10.3390/jcm12031186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDonald E. S.; Mankoff D. A.; Mach R. H. Novel Strategies for Breast Cancer Imaging: New Imaging Agents to Guide Treatment. J. Nucl. Med. 2016, 57, 69S–74S. 10.2967/jnumed.115.157925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Groheux D.; Hindie E.; Baillet G.; Hennequin C.; Misset J.-L.; Sarandi F.; Toubert M.-E.; Barre E.; Moretti J.-L. [Advantages of PET-CT in the work-up of cervical cancer]. Bull. Cancer 2009, 96 (2), 199–211. 10.1684/bdc.2008.0815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lind P.; Igerc I.; Beyer T.; Reinprecht P.; Hausegger K. Advantages and Limitations of FDG PET in the Follow-up of Breast Cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2004, 31, S125–S134. 10.1007/s00259-004-1535-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Falahatpour Z.; Geramifar P.; Mahdavi S. R.; Abdollahi H.; Salimi Y.; Nikoofar A.; Ay M. R. Potential Advantages of FDG-PET Radiomic Feature Map for Target Volume Delineation in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy. J. Appl. Clin Med. Phys. 2022, 23 (9), e13696 10.1002/acm2.13696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shukla A. K.; Kumar U. Positron Emission Tomography: An Overview. J. Med. Phys. 2006, 31 (1), 13–21. 10.4103/0971-6203.25665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jin C.; Luo X.; Li X.; Zhou R.; Zhong Y.; Xu Z.; Cui C.; Xing X.; Zhang H.; Tian M. Positron Emission Tomography Molecular Imaging-based Cancer Phenotyping. Cancer 2022, 128 (14), 2704–2716. 10.1002/cncr.34228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crişan G.; Moldovean-Cioroianu N. S.; Timaru D.-G.; Andrieş; Cǎinap C.; Chiş V. Radiopharmaceuticals for PET and SPECT Imaging: A Literature Review over the Last Decade. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23 (9), 5023. 10.3390/ijms23095023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalemaki M. S.; Karantanas A. H.; Exarchos D.; Detorakis E. T.; Zoras O.; Marias K.; Millo C.; Bagci U.; Pallikaris I.; Stratis A.; Karatzanis I.; Perisinakis K.; Koutentakis P.; Kontadakis G. A.; Spandidos D. A.; Tsatsakis A.; Papadakis G. Z. PET/CT and PET/MRI in Ophthalmic Oncology (Review). Int. J. Oncol. 2020, 56 (2), 417–429. 10.3892/ijo.2020.4955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Werner R. A.; Chen X.; Lapa C.; Koshino K.; Rowe S. P.; Pomper M. G.; Javadi M. S.; Higuchi T. The next Era of Renal Radionuclide Imaging: Novel PET Radiotracers. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 46 (9), 1773–1786. 10.1007/s00259-019-04359-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang R.; Wang M.; Zhu Y.; Conti P. S.; Chen K. Development of PET Probes for Cancer Imaging. Curr. Top Med. Chem. 2015, 15 (8), 795–819. 10.2174/1568026615666150302110325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langen K.-J.; Heinzel A.; Lohmann P.; Mottaghy F. M.; Galldiks N. Advantages and Limitations of Amino Acid PET for Tracking Therapy Response in Glioma Patients. Expert Rev. Neurother 2020, 20 (2), 137–146. 10.1080/14737175.2020.1704256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mason N. S.; Mathis C. A. Positron Emission Tomography Radiochemistry. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2003, 13 (4), 671–687. 10.1016/S1052-5149(03)00093-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delso G.; ter Voert E.; Veit-Haibach P. How Does PET/MR Work? Basic Physics for Physicians. Abdom Imaging 2015, 40 (6), 1352–1357. 10.1007/s00261-015-0437-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacManus M.; Nestle U.; Rosenzweig K. E.; Carrio I.; Messa C.; Belohlavek O.; Danna M.; Inoue T.; Deniaud-Alexandre E.; Schipani S.; Watanabe N.; Dondi M.; Jeremic B. Use of PET and PET/CT for Radiation Therapy Planning: IAEA Expert Report 2006–2007. Radiother Oncol 2009, 91 (1), 85–94. 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Basu S.; Hess S.; Nielsen Braad P.-E.; Olsen B. B.; Inglev S.; Høilund-Carlsen P. F. The Basic Principles of FDG-PET/CT Imaging. PET Clinics 2014, 9 (4), 355–370. 10.1016/j.cpet.2014.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hooker J. M. Modular Strategies for PET Imaging Agents. Curr. Opin Chem. Biol. 2010, 14 (1), 105. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gaeta C. M.; Vercher-Conejero J. L.; Sher A. C.; Kohan A.; Rubbert C.; Avril N. Recurrent and Metastatic Breast Cancer PET, PET/CT, PET/MRI: FDG and New Biomarkers. Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2013, 57 (4), 352–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Kouwen M. C. A.; Oyen W. J. G.; Nagengast F. M.; Jansen J. B. M. J.; Drenth J. P. H. FDG-PET Scanning in the Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Cancers. Scand. J. Gastroenterol Suppl 2004, 39 (241), 85–92. 10.1080/00855920410014614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valls L.; Badve C.; Avril S.; Herrmann K.; Faulhaber P.; O’Donnell J.; Avril N. FDG-PET Imaging in Hematological Malignancies. Blood Rev. 2016, 30 (4), 317–331. 10.1016/j.blre.2016.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sobic-Saranovic D.; Artiko V.; Obradovic V. FDG PET Imaging in Sarcoidosis. Semin Nucl. Med. 2013, 43 (6), 404–411. 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2013.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paydary K.; Seraj S. M.; Zadeh M. Z.; Emamzadehfard S.; Shamchi S. P.; Gholami S.; Werner T. J.; Alavi A. The Evolving Role of FDG-PET/CT in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2019, 21 (1), 1–10. 10.1007/s11307-018-1181-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singnurkar A.; Poon R.; Metser U. Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/MR Imaging in Oncology: A Systematic Review. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2017, 31 (5), 366–378. 10.1007/s12149-017-1164-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng G.; Servaes S.; Alavi A.; Zhuang H. FDG PET and PET/CT in the Management of Pediatric Lymphoma Patients. PET Clin 2008, 3 (4), 621–634. 10.1016/j.cpet.2009.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Almuhaideb A.; Papathanasiou N.; Bomanji J. 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging In Oncology. Ann. Saudi Med. 2011, 31 (1), 3–13. 10.4103/0256-4947.75771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jensen M. M.; Kjaer A. Monitoring of Anti-Cancer Treatment with 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT PET: A Comprehensive Review of Pre-Clinical Studies. Am. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2015, 5 (5), 431–456. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pijl J. P.; Nienhuis P. H.; Kwee T. C.; Glaudemans A. W. J. M.; Slart R. H. J. A.; Gormsen L. C. Limitations and Pitfalls of FDG-PET/CT in Infection and Inflammation. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 2021, 51 (6), 633–645. 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang J. M.; Lee H. J.; Goo J. M.; Lee H.-Y.; Lee J. J.; Chung J.-K.; Im J.-G. False Positive and False Negative FDG-PET Scans in Various Thoracic Diseases. Korean J. Radiol 2006, 7 (1), 57–69. 10.3348/kjr.2006.7.1.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans B. J.; King A. T.; Katsifis A.; Matesic L.; Jamie J. F. Methods to Enhance the Metabolic Stability of Peptide-Based PET Radiopharmaceuticals. Molecules 2020, 25 (10), 2314. 10.3390/molecules25102314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aluicio-Sarduy E.; Ellison P. A.; Barnhart T. E.; Cai W.; Nickles R. J.; Engle J. W. PET Radiometals for Antibody Labeling. J. Labelled Comp Radiopharm 2018, 61 (9), 636–651. 10.1002/jlcr.3607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reubi J. C. Peptide Receptors as Molecular Targets for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy. Endocr Rev. 2003, 24 (4), 389–427. 10.1210/er.2002-0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaewput C.; Vinjamuri S. Role of Combined 68Ga DOTA-Peptides and 18F FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022, 12 (2), 280. 10.3390/diagnostics12020280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grimsey E.; Collis D. W. P.; Mikut R.; Hilpert K. The Effect of Lipidation and Glycosylation on Short Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 2020, 1862 (8), 183195. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2020.183195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maxian T.; Gerlitz L.; Riedl S.; Rinner B.; Zweytick D. Effect of L- to D-Amino Acid Substitution on Stability and Activity of Antitumor Peptide RDP215 against Human Melanoma and Glioblastoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22 (16), 8469. 10.3390/ijms22168469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moreira Brito J. C.; Carvalho L. R.; Neves de Souza A.; Carneiro G.; Magalhães P. P.; Farias L. M.; Guimarães N. R.; Verly R. M.; Resende J. M.; Elena de Lima M. PEGylation of the Antimicrobial Peptide LyeTx I-b Maintains Structure-Related Biological Properties and Improves Selectivity. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 1001508. 10.3389/fmolb.2022.1001508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patamia V.; Zagni C.; Brullo I.; Saccullo E.; Coco A.; Floresta G.; Rescifina A. Computer-Assisted Design of Peptide-Based Radiotracers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24 (7), 6856. 10.3390/ijms24076856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Humphrey W.; Dalke A.; Schulten K. VMD – Visual Molecular Dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14, 33–38. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Citations and References. Schrödinger.; https://www.schrodinger.com/citations/ (accessed 2024–07–24).
- Pung H. S.; Tye G. J.; Leow C. H.; Ng W. K.; Lai N. S. Generation of Peptides Using Phage Display Technology for Cancer Diagnosis and Molecular Imaging. Mol. Biol. Rep 2023, 50 (5), 4653–4664. 10.1007/s11033-023-08380-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holik H. A.; Ibrahim F. M.; Elaine A. A.; Putra B. D.; Achmad A.; Kartamihardja A. H. S. The Chemical Scaffold of Theranostic Radiopharmaceuticals: Radionuclide, Bifunctional Chelator, and Pharmacokinetics Modifying Linker. Molecules 2022, 27 (10), 3062. 10.3390/molecules27103062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sales T. A.; Prandi I. G.; de Castro A. A.; Leal D. H. S.; da Cunha E. F. F.; Kuca K.; Ramalho T. C. Recent Developments in Metal-Based Drugs and Chelating Agents for Neurodegenerative Diseases Treatments. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20 (8), 1829. 10.3390/ijms20081829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jamous M.; Haberkorn U.; Mier W. Synthesis of Peptide Radiopharmaceuticals for the Therapy and Diagnosis of Tumor Diseases. Molecules 2013, 18 (3), 3379–3409. 10.3390/molecules18033379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ghosh S. C.; Pinkston K. L.; Robinson H.; Harvey B. R.; Wilganowski N.; Gore K.; Sevick-Muraca E. M.; Azhdarinia A. Comparison of DOTA and NODAGA as Chelators for (64)Cu-Labeled Immunoconjugates. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2015, 42 (2), 177–183. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2014.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Imura R.; Ida H.; Sasaki I.; Ishioka N. S.; Watanabe S. Re-Evaluations of Zr-DFO Complex Coordination Chemistry for the Estimation of Radiochemical Yields and Chelator-to-Antibody Ratios of 89Zr Immune-PET Tracers. Molecules 2021, 26 (16), 4977. 10.3390/molecules26164977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chomet M.; Schreurs M.; Bolijn M. J.; Verlaan M.; Beaino W.; Brown K.; Poot A. J.; Windhorst A. D.; Gill H.; Marik J.; Williams S.; Cowell J.; Gasser G.; Mindt T. L.; van Dongen G. A. M. S.; Vugts D. J. Head-to-Head Comparison of DFO* and DFO Chelators: Selection of the Best Candidate for Clinical 89Zr-Immuno-PET. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2021, 48 (3), 694–707. 10.1007/s00259-020-05002-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma M. T.; Cullinane C.; Waldeck K.; Roselt P.; Hicks R. J.; Blower P. J. Rapid Kit-Based 68Ga-Labelling and PET Imaging with THP-Tyr3-Octreotate: A Preliminary Comparison with DOTA-Tyr3-Octreotate. EJNMMI Research 2015, 5 (1), 52. 10.1186/s13550-015-0131-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiang Q.; Li D.; Cheng C.; Xu K.; Zuo C. 68Ga-HBED-CC-WL-12 PET in Diagnosing and Differentiating Pancreatic Cancers in Murine Models. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16 (1), 80. 10.3390/ph16010080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jerzyk K.; Kludkiewicz D.; Pijarowska-Kruszyna J.; Jaron A.; Maurin M.; Sikora A.; Kordowski L.; Garnuszek P. Synthesis of HBED–CC–Tris(Tert-Butyl Ester) Using a Solid Phase and a Microwave Reactor. Tetrahedron 2021, 84, 132018. 10.1016/j.tet.2021.132018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Versatile Diphosphine Chelators for Radiolabeling Peptides with 99mTc and 64Cu-PMC; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10731650/ (accessed 2024–06–19). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Hennrich U.; Benešová M. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC: The First FDA-Approved 68Ga-Radiopharmaceutical for PET Imaging. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2020, 13 (3), 38. 10.3390/ph13030038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Romero E.; Martínez A.; Oteo M.; Ibañez M.; Santos M.; Morcillo M. Á. Development and Long-Term Evaluation of a New 68Ge/68Ga Generator Based on Nano-SnO2 for PET Imaging. Sci. Rep 2020, 10 (1), 12756. 10.1038/s41598-020-69659-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xavier C.; Vaneycken I.; D’huyvetter M.; Heemskerk J.; Keyaerts M.; Vincke C.; Devoogdt N.; Muyldermans S.; Lahoutte T.; Caveliers V. Synthesis, Preclinical Validation, Dosimetry, and Toxicity of 68Ga-NOTA-Anti-HER2 Nanobodies for iPET Imaging of HER2 Receptor Expression in Cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54 (5), 776–784. 10.2967/jnumed.112.111021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saatchi K.; Bénard F.; Hundal N.; Grimes J.; Shcherbinin S.; Pourghiasian M.; Brooks D. E.; Celler A.; Häfeli U. O. Preclinical PET Imaging and Toxicity Study of a 68Ga-Functionalized Polymeric Cardiac Blood Pool Agent. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15 (3), 767. 10.3390/pharmaceutics15030767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deppen S. A.; Liu E.; Blume J. D.; Clanton J.; Shi C.; Jones-Jackson L. B.; Lakhani V.; Baum R. P.; Berlin J.; Smith G. T.; Graham M.; Sandler M. P.; Delbeke D.; Walker R. C. Safety and Efficacy of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment Management of Neuroendocrine Tumors. J. Nucl. Med. 2016, 57 (5), 708–714. 10.2967/jnumed.115.163865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Melincovici C. S.; Boşca A. B.; Şuşman S.; Mǎrginean M.; Mihu C.; Istrate M.; Moldovan I. M.; Roman A. L.; Mihu C. M. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) - Key Factor in Normal and Pathological Angiogenesis. Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. 2018, 59 (2), 455–467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carmeliet P. VEGF as a Key Mediator of Angiogenesis in Cancer. Oncology 2005, 69, 4–10. 10.1159/000088478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li S.; Xu H.-X.; Wu C.-T.; Wang W.-Q.; Jin W.; Gao H.-L.; Li H.; Zhang S.-R.; Xu J.-Z.; Qi Z.-H.; Ni Q.-X.; Yu X.-J.; Liu L. Angiogenesis in Pancreatic Cancer: Current Research Status and Clinical Implications. Angiogenesis 2019, 22 (1), 15–36. 10.1007/s10456-018-9645-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dumond A.; Pagès G. Neuropilins, as Relevant Oncology Target: Their Role in the Tumoral Microenvironment. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 662. 10.3389/fcell.2020.00662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Viallard C.; Larrivée B. Tumor Angiogenesis and Vascular Normalization: Alternative Therapeutic Targets. Angiogenesis 2017, 20 (4), 409–426. 10.1007/s10456-017-9562-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Douyère M.; Chastagner P.; Boura C. Neuropilin-1: A Key Protein to Consider in the Progression of Pediatric Brain Tumors. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 665634. 10.3389/fonc.2021.665634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang Y. H.; Rockstroh A.; Sokolowski K. A.; Lynam L.-R.; Lehman M.; Thompson E. W.; Gregory P. A.; Nelson C. C.; Volpert M.; Hollier B. G. Neuropilin-1 Is over-Expressed in Claudin-Low Breast Cancer and Promotes Tumor Progression through Acquisition of Stem Cell Characteristics and RAS/MAPK Pathway Activation. Breast Cancer Research 2022, 24 (1), 8. 10.1186/s13058-022-01501-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moussaron A.; Jouan-Hureaux V.; Collet C.; Pierson J.; Thomas N.; Choulier L.; Veran N.; Doyen M.; Arnoux P.; Maskali F.; Dumas D.; Acherar S.; Barberi-Heyob M.; Frochot C. Preliminary Study of New Gallium-68 Radiolabeled Peptide Targeting NRP-1 to Detect Brain Metastases by Positron Emission Tomography. Molecules 2021, 26 (23), 7273. 10.3390/molecules26237273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qiu S.; Nikolaou S.; Zhu J.; Jeffery P.; Goldin R.; Kinross J.; Alexander J. L.; Rasheed S.; Tekkis P.; Kontovounisios C. Characterisation of the Expression of Neurotensin and Its Receptors in Human Colorectal Cancer and Its Clinical Implications. Biomolecules 2020, 10 (8), 1145. 10.3390/biom10081145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takahashi K.; Ehata S.; Miyauchi K.; Morishita Y.; Miyazawa K.; Miyazono K. Neurotensin Receptor 1 Signaling Promotes Pancreatic Cancer Progression. Mol. Oncol 2021, 15 (1), 151–166. 10.1002/1878-0261.12815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schindler L.; Moosbauer J.; Schmidt D.; Spruss T.; Grätz L.; Lüdeke S.; Hofheinz F.; Meister S.; Echtenacher B.; Bernhardt G.; Pietzsch J.; Hellwig D.; Keller M. Development of a Neurotensin-Derived 68Ga-Labeled PET Ligand with High In Vivo Stability for Imaging of NTS1 Receptor-Expressing Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2022, 14 (19), 4922. 10.3390/cancers14194922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A.; Pan L.; Strauss L. G. Quantitative Approaches of Dynamic FDG-PET and PET/CT Studies (dPET/CT) for the Evaluation of Oncological Patients. Cancer Imaging 2012, 12 (1), 283–289. 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang S.; De Leon Rodriguez L. M.; Li F. F.; Brimble M. A. Recent Developments in the Cleavage, Functionalization, and Conjugation of Proteins and Peptides at Tyrosine Residues. Chem. Sci. 2023, 14 (29), 7782–7817. 10.1039/D3SC02543H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clift A. K.; Kidd M.; Bodei L.; Toumpanakis C.; Baum R. P.; Oberg K.; Modlin I. M.; Frilling A. Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Small Bowel and Pancreas. Neuroendocrinology 2020, 110 (6), 444–476. 10.1159/000503721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pauwels E.; Cleeren F.; Bormans G.; Deroose C. M. Somatostatin Receptor PET Ligands - the next Generation for Clinical Practice. Am. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2018, 8 (5), 311–331. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nilica B.; Waitz D.; Stevanovic V.; Uprimny C.; Kendler D.; Buxbaum S.; Warwitz B.; Gerardo L.; Henninger B.; Virgolini I.; Rodrigues M. Direct Comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-TOC and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Follow-up of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumour Treated with the First Full Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Cycle. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2016, 43 (9), 1585–1592. 10.1007/s00259-016-3328-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adnan A.; Basu S. Somatostatin Receptor Targeted PET-CT and Its Role in the Management and Theranostics of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Diagnostics 2023, 13 (13), 2154. 10.3390/diagnostics13132154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chauvin J.-M.; Zarour H. M. TIGIT in Cancer Immunotherapy. J. Immunother Cancer 2020, 8 (2), e000957 10.1136/jitc-2020-000957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freed-Pastor W. A.; Lambert L. J.; Ely Z. A.; Pattada N. B.; Bhutkar A.; Eng G.; Mercer K. L.; Garcia A. P.; Lin L.; Rideout W. M.; Hwang W. L.; Schenkel J. M.; Jaeger A. M.; Bronson R. T.; Westcott P. M. K.; Hether T. D.; Divakar P.; Reeves J. W.; Deshpande V.; Delorey T.; Phillips D.; Yilmaz O. H.; Regev A.; Jacks T. The CD155/TIGIT Axis Promotes and Maintains Immune Evasion in Neoantigen-Expressing Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Cell 2021, 39 (10), 1342–1360. 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shaffer T.; Natarajan A.; Gambhir S. S. PET Imaging of TIGIT Expression on Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021, 27 (7), 1932–1940. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang X.; Zhou M.; Chen B.; Liu H.; Fang J.; Xiang S.; Hu S.; Zhang X. Preclinical and Exploratory Human Studies of Novel 68Ga-Labeled D-Peptide Antagonist for PET Imaging of TIGIT Expression in Cancers. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2022, 49 (8), 2584–2594. 10.1007/s00259-021-05672-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou X.; Zuo C.; Li W.; Shi W.; Zhou X.; Wang H.; Chen S.; Du J.; Chen G.; Zhai W.; Zhao W.; Wu Y.; Qi Y.; Liu L.; Gao Y. A Novel D-Peptide Identified by Mirror-Image Phage Display Blocks TIGIT/PVR for Cancer Immunotherapy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59 (35), 15114–15118. 10.1002/anie.202002783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weng D.; Guo R.; Zhu Z.; Gao Y.; An R.; Zhou X. Peptide-Based PET Imaging Agent of Tumor TIGIT Expression. EJNMMI Research 2023, 13 (1), 38. 10.1186/s13550-023-00982-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar K. The Current Status of the Production and Supply of Gallium-68. Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals 2020, 35 (3), 163–166. 10.1089/cbr.2019.3301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hennrich U.; Eder M. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11: The First FDA-Approved 68Ga-Radiopharmaceutical for PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021, 14 (8), 713. 10.3390/ph14080713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michalski K.; Kemna L.; Asberger J.; Grosu A. L.; Meyer P. T.; Ruf J.; Sprave T. Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Antagonist [68Ga]RM2 PET/CT for Staging of Pre-Treated, Metastasized Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021, 13 (23), 6106. 10.3390/cancers13236106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J.; Niu G.; Fan X.; Lang L.; Hou G.; Chen L.; Wu H.; Zhu Z.; Li F.; Chen X. PET Using a GRPR Antagonist 68Ga-RM26 in Healthy Volunteers and Prostate Cancer Patients. J. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59 (6), 922–928. 10.2967/jnumed.117.198929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jauregui-Osoro M.; De Robertis S.; Halsted P.; Gould S.-M.; Yu Z.; Paul R. L.; Marsden P. K.; Gee A. D.; Fenwick A.; Blower P. J. Production of Copper-64 Using a Hospital Cyclotron: Targetry, Purification and Quality Analysis. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2021, 42 (9), 1024–1038. 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson C. J.; Ferdani R. Copper-64 Radiopharmaceuticals for PET Imaging of Cancer: Advances in Preclinical and Clinical Research. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2009, 24 (4), 379–393. 10.1089/cbr.2009.0674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu K.; Ma X.; Xie L.; Zhang Y.; Hanyu M.; Obata H.; Zhang L.; Nagatsu K.; Suzuki H.; Shi R.; Wang W.; Zhang M.-R. Development of a Stable Peptide-Based PET Tracer for Detecting CD133-Expressing Cancer Cells. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (1), 334–341. 10.1021/acsomega.1c04711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suman S.; Hota S. K.; Misra P.; Sahu N.; Sahu S. Immunohistochemical Expression of the Stem Cell Marker CD133 in Colorectal Carcinoma. Cureus 2023, 15 (7), e41242. 10.7759/cureus.41242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marzagalli M.; Fontana F.; Raimondi M.; Limonta P. Cancer Stem Cells—Key Players in Tumor Relapse. Cancers (Basel) 2021, 13 (3), 376. 10.3390/cancers13030376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eramo A.; Lotti F.; Sette G.; Pilozzi E.; Biffoni M.; Di Virgilio A.; Conticello C.; Ruco L.; Peschle C.; De Maria R. Identification and Expansion of the Tumorigenic Lung Cancer Stem Cell Population. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15 (3), 504–514. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Markowska A.; Markowski A. R.; Jarocka-Karpowicz I. The Importance of 6-Aminohexanoic Acid as a Hydrophobic, Flexible Structural Element. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22 (22), 12122. 10.3390/ijms222212122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freeman G. J.; Long A. J.; Iwai Y.; Bourque K.; Chernova T.; Nishimura H.; Fitz L. J.; Malenkovich N.; Okazaki T.; Byrne M. C.; Horton H. F.; Fouser L.; Carter L.; Ling V.; Bowman M. R.; Carreno B. M.; Collins M.; Wood C. R.; Honjo T. Engagement of the PD-1 Immunoinhibitory Receptor by a Novel B7 Family Member Leads to Negative Regulation of Lymphocyte Activation. J. Exp Med. 2000, 192 (7), 1027–1034. 10.1084/jem.192.7.1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kornepati A. V. R.; Vadlamudi R. K.; Curiel T. J. Programmed Death Ligand 1 Signals in Cancer Cells. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2022, 22 (3), 174–189. 10.1038/s41568-021-00431-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar D.; Lisok A.; Dahmane E.; McCoy M.; Shelake S.; Chatterjee S.; Allaj V.; Sysa-Shah P.; Wharram B.; Lesniak W. G.; Tully E.; Gabrielson E.; Jaffee E. M.; Poirier J. T.; Rudin C. M.; Gobburu J. V. S.; Pomper M. G.; Nimmagadda S. Peptide-Based PET Quantifies Target Engagement of PD-L1 Therapeutics. J. Clin Invest. 2019, 129 (2), 616–630. 10.1172/JCI122216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang J.; Li D.; Liu T.; Xia L.; Guo X.; Meng X.; Liu F.; Wang F.; Yang Z.; Zhu H. Noninvasive Evaluation of PD-L1 Expression Using Copper 64 Labeled Peptide WL12 by Micro-PET Imaging in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cell Tumor Model. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2021, 40, 127901. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2021.127901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lesniak W. G.; Mease R. C.; Chatterjee S.; Kumar D.; Lisok A.; Wharram B.; Kalagadda V. R.; Emens L. A.; Pomper M. G.; Nimmagadda S. Development of [18F]FPy-WL12 as a PD-L1 Specific PET Imaging Peptide. Mol. Imaging 2019, 18, 1536012119852189. 10.1177/1536012119852189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chatterjee S.; Lesniak W. G.; Miller M. S.; Lisok A.; Sikorska E.; Wharram B.; Kumar D.; Gabrielson M.; Pomper M. G.; Gabelli S. B.; Nimmagadda S. Rapid PD-L1 Detection in Tumors with PET Using a Highly Specific Peptide. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 483 (1), 258–263. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.12.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brzozowska E.; Deshmukh S. Integrin Alpha v Beta 6 (Αvβ6) and Its Implications in Cancer Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23 (20), 12346. 10.3390/ijms232012346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huynh T. T.; Sreekumar S.; Mpoy C.; Rogers B. E. A Comparison of 64Cu-Labeled Bi-Terminally PEGylated A20FMDV2 Peptides Targeting Integrin Ανβ6. Oncotarget 2022, 13, 360–372. 10.18632/oncotarget.28197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hausner S. H.; DiCara D.; Marik J.; Marshall J. F.; Sutcliffe J. L. Use of a Peptide Derived from Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus for the Noninvasive Imaging of Human Cancer: Generation and Evaluation of 4-[18F]Fluorobenzoyl A20FMDV2 for in Vivo Imaging of Integrin Alphavbeta6 Expression with Positron Emission Tomography. Cancer Res. 2007, 67 (16), 7833–7840. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bergeron D.; Cessna J.; Jacobs H.; Zimmerman B. Standards for Cu-64 Activity: A New National Standard for the USA, Links to International Standards, and Dose Calibrator Factors. J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 58, 1299. [Google Scholar]
- Hausner S. H.; Bold R. J.; Cheuy L. Y.; Chew H. K.; Daly M. E.; Davis R. A.; Foster C. C.; Kim E. J.; Sutcliffe J. L. Preclinical Development and First-in-Human Imaging of the Integrin Αvβ6 with [18F]Αvβ6-Binding Peptide in Metastatic Carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25 (4), 1206–1215. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu J.; Li N.; Li J.; Lu M.; Leal J. P.; Tan H.; Su H.; Fan Y.; Zhang Y.; Zhao W.; Zhu H.; Pomper M. G.; Zhou Y.; Yang Z. The Correlation Between [68Ga]DOTATATE PET/CT and Cell Proliferation in Patients With GEP-NENs. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2019, 21 (5), 984–990. 10.1007/s11307-019-01328-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayes A. R.; Furtado O’Mahony L.; Quigley A.-M.; Gnanasegaran G.; Caplin M. E.; Navalkissoor S.; Toumpanakis C. The Combined Interpretation of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Classification System With Prognostic Impact. Clin Nucl. Med. 2022, 47 (1), 26–35. 10.1097/RLU.0000000000003937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hicks R. J.; Jackson P.; Kong G.; Ware R. E.; Hofman M. S.; Pattison D. A.; Akhurst T. A.; Drummond E.; Roselt P.; Callahan J.; Price R.; Jeffery C. M.; Hong E.; Noonan W.; Herschtal A.; Hicks L. J.; Hedt A.; Harris M.; Paterson B. M.; Donnelly P. S. 64Cu-SARTATE PET Imaging of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors Demonstrates High Tumor Uptake and Retention, Potentially Allowing Prospective Dosimetry for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy. J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 60 (6), 777–785. 10.2967/jnumed.118.217745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnbeck C. B.; Knigge U.; Loft A.; Berthelsen A. K.; Mortensen J.; Oturai P.; Langer S. W.; Elema D. R.; Kjaer A. Head-to-Head Comparison of 64Cu-DOTATATE and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT: A Prospective Study of 59 Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors. J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 58 (3), 451–457. 10.2967/jnumed.116.180430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cullinane C.; Jeffery C. M.; Roselt P. D.; van Dam E. M.; Jackson S.; Kuan K.; Jackson P.; Binns D.; van Zuylekom J.; Harris M. J.; Hicks R. J.; Donnelly P. S. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 67Cu-CuSarTATE Is Highly Efficacious Against a Somatostatin-Positive Neuroendocrine Tumor Model. J. Nucl. Med. 2020, 61 (12), 1800–1805. 10.2967/jnumed.120.243543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gutfilen B.; Souza S. A.; Valentini G. Copper-64: A Real Theranostic Agent. Drug Des Devel Ther 2018, 12, 3235–3245. 10.2147/DDDT.S170879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woo S.-K.; Jang S. J.; Seo M.-J.; Park J. H.; Kim B. S.; Kim E. J.; Lee Y. J.; Lee T. S.; An G. I.; Song I. H.; Seo Y.; Kim K. I.; Kang J. H. Development of 64Cu-NOTA-Trastuzumab for HER2 Targeting: A Radiopharmaceutical with Improved Pharmacokinetics for Human Studies. J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 60 (1), 26–33. 10.2967/jnumed.118.210294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lengyelova E.; Wong V.; Lenzo N.; Parker M.; Emmett L. 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA (PROPELLER) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging in Patients with Confirmed Prostate Cancer. JCO 2023, 41, 5039–5039. 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.5039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Laforest R.; Ghai A.; Fraum T. J.; Oyama R.; Frye J.; Kaemmerer H.; Gaehle G.; Voller T.; Mpoy C.; Rogers B. E.; Fiala M.; Shoghi K. I.; Achilefu S.; Rettig M.; Vij R.; DiPersio J. F.; Schwarz S.; Shokeen M.; Dehdashti F. First-in-Humans Evaluation of Safety and Dosimetry of 64Cu-LLP2A for PET Imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 2023, 64 (2), 320–328. 10.2967/jnumed.122.264349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jauw Y. W. S.; O’Donoghue J. A.; Zijlstra J. M.; Hoekstra O. S.; Menke-van der Houven van Oordt C. W.; Morschhauser F.; Carrasquillo J. A.; Zweegman S.; Pandit-Taskar N.; Lammertsma A. A.; van Dongen G. A. M. S.; Boellaard R.; Weber W. A.; Huisman M. C. 89Zr-Immuno-PET: Toward a Noninvasive Clinical Tool to Measure Target Engagement of Therapeutic Antibodies In Vivo. J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 60 (12), 1825–1832. 10.2967/jnumed.118.224568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trencsényi G.; Képes Z. Scandium-44: Diagnostic Feasibility in Tumor-Related Angiogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24 (8), 7400. 10.3390/ijms24087400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sitarz M.; Cussonneau J.-P.; Matulewicz T.; Haddad F. Radionuclide Candidates for Β+γ Coincidence PET: An Overview. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 2020, 155, 108898. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2019.108898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rauscher I.; Krönke M.; König M.; Gafita A.; Maurer T.; Horn T.; Schiller K.; Weber W.; Eiber M. Matched-Pair Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT: Frequency of Pitfalls and Detection Efficacy in Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy. J. Nucl. Med. 2020, 61 (1), 51–57. 10.2967/jnumed.119.229187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parikh N. R.; Tsai S.; Bennett C.; Lewis M.; Sadeghi A.; Lorentz W.; Cheung M.; Garraway I.; Aronson W.; Kishan A. U.; Bahri S.; Vahidi K.; Calais J.; Ishimitsu D.; Rettig M.; Nickols N. G.; Jafari L. The Impact of 18F-DCFPyL PET-CT Imaging on Initial Staging, Radiation, and Systemic Therapy Treatment Recommendations for Veterans With Aggressive Prostate Cancer. Adv. Radiat Oncol 2020, 5 (6), 1364–1369. 10.1016/j.adro.2020.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Treglia G.; Annunziata S.; Pizzuto D. A.; Giovanella L.; Prior J. O.; Ceriani L. Detection Rate of 18F-Labeled PSMA PET/CT in Biochemical Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2019, 11 (5), 710. 10.3390/cancers11050710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferraro D. A.; Rüschoff J. H.; Muehlematter U. J.; Kranzbühler B.; Müller J.; Messerli M.; Husmann L.; Hermanns T.; Eberli D.; Rupp N. J.; Burger I. A. Immunohistochemical PSMA Expression Patterns of Primary Prostate Cancer Tissue Are Associated with the Detection Rate of Biochemical Recurrence with 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET. Theranostics 2020, 10 (14), 6082–6094. 10.7150/thno.44584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vázquez S. M.; Endepols H.; Fischer T.; Tawadros S.-G.; Hohberg M.; Zimmermanns B.; Dietlein F.; Neumaier B.; Drzezga A.; Dietlein M.; Schomäcker K. Translational Development of a Zr-89-Labeled Inhibitor of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for PET Imaging in Prostate Cancer. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2022, 24 (1), 115–125. 10.1007/s11307-021-01632-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hernandez R.; Valdovinos H. F.; Yang Y.; Chakravarty R.; Hong H.; Barnhart T. E.; Cai W. 44Sc: An Attractive Isotope for Peptide-Based PET Imaging. Mol. Pharmaceutics 2014, 11 (8), 2954–2961. 10.1021/mp500343j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kálmán-Szabó I.; Szabó J. P.; Arató V.; Dénes N.; Opposits G.; Jószai I.; Kertész I.; Képes Z.; Fekete A.; Szikra D.; Hajdu I.; Trencsényi G. PET Probes for Preclinical Imaging of GRPR-Positive Prostate Cancer: Comparative Preclinical Study of [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-AMBA and [44Sc]Sc-NODAGA-AMBA. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23 (17), 10061. 10.3390/ijms231710061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li L.; Wu C.; Pan L.; Li X.; Kuang A.; Cai H.; Tian R. Bombesin-Functionalized Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Dual-Modality MR/NIRFI in Mouse Models of Breast Cancer. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2019, 14, 6721–6732. 10.2147/IJN.S211476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baratto L.; Jadvar H.; Iagaru A. Prostate Cancer Theranostics Targeting Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptors. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2018, 20 (4), 501–509. 10.1007/s11307-017-1151-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Faviana P.; Boldrini L.; Erba P. A.; Di Stefano I.; Manassero F.; Bartoletti R.; Galli L.; Gentile C.; Bardi M. Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor in Low Grade Prostate Cancer: Can. It Be a Better Predictor Than Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen?. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 650249. 10.3389/fonc.2021.650249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moiola M.; Memeo M. G.; Quadrelli P. Stapled Peptides—A Useful Improvement for Peptide-Based Drugs. Molecules 2019, 24 (20), 3654. 10.3390/molecules24203654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Monieri M.; Rainone P.; Sacchi A.; Gori A.; Gasparri A. M.; Coliva A.; Citro A.; Ferrara B.; Policardi M.; Valtorta S.; Pocaterra A.; Alfano M.; Sheppard D.; Piemonti L.; Moresco R. M.; Corti A.; Curnis F. A Stapled Chromogranin A-Derived Peptide Homes in on Tumors That Express Αvβ6 or Αvβ8 Integrins. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2023, 19 (1), 156–166. 10.7150/ijbs.76148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abdulbagi M.; Wang L.; Siddig O.; Di B.; Li B. D-Amino Acids and D-Amino Acid-Containing Peptides: Potential Disease Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets?. Biomolecules 2021, 11 (11), 1716. 10.3390/biom11111716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garton M.; Nim S.; Stone T. A.; Wang K. E.; Deber C. M.; Kim P. M. Method to Generate Highly Stable D-Amino Acid Analogs of Bioactive Helical Peptides Using a Mirror Image of the Entire PDB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2018, 115 (7), 1505–1510. 10.1073/pnas.1711837115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bastings J. J. A. J.; van Eijk H. M.; Olde Damink S. W.; Rensen S. S. D-Amino Acids in Health and Disease: A Focus on Cancer. Nutrients 2019, 11 (9), 2205. 10.3390/nu11092205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng Z.; Xu B. Inspiration from the Mirror: D-Amino Acid Containing Peptides in Biomedical Approaches. Biomol Concepts 2016, 7 (3), 179–187. 10.1515/bmc-2015-0035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Riedl S.; Rinner B.; Asslaber M.; Schaider H.; Walzer S.; Novak A.; Lohner K.; Zweytick D. In Search of a Novel Target — Phosphatidylserine Exposed by Non-Apoptotic Tumor Cells and Metastases of Malignancies with Poor Treatment Efficacy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1808 (11–15), 2638–2645. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.07.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aillaud I.; Kaniyappan S.; Chandupatla R. R.; Ramirez L. M.; Alkhashrom S.; Eichler J.; Horn A. H. C.; Zweckstetter M.; Mandelkow E.; Sticht H.; Funke S. A. A Novel D-Amino Acid Peptide with Therapeutic Potential (ISAD1) Inhibits Aggregation of Neurotoxic Disease-Relevant Mutant Tau and Prevents Tau Toxicity in Vitro. Alzheimer's Res. Ther. 2022, 14 (1), 15. 10.1186/s13195-022-00959-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hong S. Y.; Oh J. E.; Lee K. H. Effect of D-Amino Acid Substitution on the Stability, the Secondary Structure, and the Activity of Membrane-Active Peptide. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1999, 58 (11), 1775–1780. 10.1016/S0006-2952(99)00259-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu J.; Xu H.; Xia J.; Ma J.; Xu J.; Li Y.; Feng J. D- and Unnatural Amino Acid Substituted Antimicrobial Peptides With Improved Proteolytic Resistance and Their Proteolytic Degradation Characteristics. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 563030. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.563030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joo S. H. Cyclic Peptides as Therapeutic Agents and Biochemical Tools. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 2012, 20 (1), 19–26. 10.4062/biomolther.2012.20.1.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rezai T.; Yu B.; Millhauser G. L.; Jacobson M. P.; Lokey R. S. Testing the Conformational Hypothesis of Passive Membrane Permeability Using Synthetic Cyclic Peptide Diastereomers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (8), 2510–2511. 10.1021/ja0563455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramadhani D.; Maharani R.; Gazzali A. M.; Muchtaridi M. Cyclic Peptides for the Treatment of Cancers: A Review. Molecules 2022, 27 (14), 4428. 10.3390/molecules27144428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dougherty P. G.; Sahni A.; Pei D. Understanding Cell Penetration of Cyclic Peptides. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119 (17), 10241–10287. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qian Z.; Rhodes C. A.; McCroskey L. C.; Wen J.; Appiah-Kubi G.; Wang D. J.; Guttridge D. C.; Pei D. Enhancing the Cell Permeability and Metabolic Stability of Peptidyl Drugs by Reversible Bicyclization. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2017, 56 (6), 1525–1529. 10.1002/anie.201610888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu Y.; Zhang X.; Xiong Z.; Cheng Z.; Fisher D. R.; Liu S.; Gambhir S. S.; Chen X. microPET Imaging of Glioma Integrin {alpha}v{beta}3 Expression Using (64)Cu-Labeled Tetrameric RGD Peptide. J. Nucl. Med. 2005, 46 (10), 1707–1718. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liolios C.; Sachpekidis C.; Kolocouris A.; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A.; Bouziotis P. PET Diagnostic Molecules Utilizing Multimeric Cyclic RGD Peptide Analogs for Imaging Integrin Αvβ3 Receptors. Molecules 2021, 26 (6), 1792. 10.3390/molecules26061792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rhodes C. A.; Pei D. Bicyclic Peptides as Next-Generation Therapeutics. Chemistry 2017, 23 (52), 12690–12703. 10.1002/chem.201702117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eder M.; Pavan S.; Bauder-Wüst U.; Van Rietschoten K.; Baranski A.-C.; Harrison H.; Campbell S.; Stace C. L.; Walker E. H.; Chen L.; Bennett G.; Mudd G.; Schierbaum U.; Leotta K.; Haberkorn U.; Kopka K.; Teufel D. P. Bicyclic Peptides as a New Modality for Imaging and Targeting of Proteins Overexpressed by Tumors. Cancer Res. 2019, 79 (4), 841–852. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reddy Chichili V. P.; Kumar V.; Sivaraman J. Linkers in the Structural Biology of Protein–Protein Interactions. Protein Sci. 2013, 22 (2), 153–167. 10.1002/pro.2206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun X.; Li Y.; Liu T.; Li Z.; Zhang X.; Chen X. Peptide-Based Imaging Agents for Cancer Detection. Adv. Drug Deliv Rev. 2017, 110–111, 38–51. 10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li M.; Zelchan R.; Orlova A. The Performance of FDA-Approved PET Imaging Agents in the Detection of Prostate Cancer. Biomedicines 2022, 10 (10), 2533. 10.3390/biomedicines10102533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FDA Approves Second PSMA-Targeted PET Imaging Drug for Men with Prostate Cancer. U.S. FDA, 2021; https://www.fda.gov/drugs/news-events-human-drugs/fda-approves-second-psma-targeted-pet-imaging-drug-men-prostate-cancer.
- Thakur R.; Suri C. R.; Kaur I. P.; Rishi P. Peptides as Diagnostic, Therapeutic, and Theranostic Tools: Progress and Future Challenges. Crit Rev. Ther Drug Carrier Syst 2023, 40 (1), 49–100. 10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.2022040322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rong L.; Lei Q.; Zhang X.-Z. Recent Advances on Peptide-Based Theranostic Nanomaterials. VIEW 2020, 1 (4), 20200050. 10.1002/VIW.20200050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zeng S.; Feng X.; Xing S.; Xu Z.; Miao Z.; Liu Q. Advanced Peptide Nanomedicines for Bladder Cancer Theranostics. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 946865. 10.3389/fchem.2022.946865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salih S.; Alkatheeri A.; Alomaim W.; Elliyanti A. Radiopharmaceutical Treatments for Cancer Therapy, Radionuclides Characteristics, Applications, and Challenges. Molecules 2022, 27 (16), 5231. 10.3390/molecules27165231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yordanova A.; Eppard E.; Kürpig S.; Bundschuh R. A.; Schönberger S.; Gonzalez-Carmona M.; Feldmann G.; Ahmadzadehfar H.; Essler M. Theranostics in Nuclear Medicine Practice. Onco Targets Ther 2017, 10, 4821–4828. 10.2147/OTT.S140671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Werner R. A.; Bundschuh R. A.; Bundschuh L.; Fanti S.; Javadi M. S.; Higuchi T.; Weich A.; Pienta K. J.; Buck A. K.; Pomper M. G.; Gorin M. A.; Herrmann K.; Lapa C.; Rowe S. P. Novel Structured Reporting Systems for Theranostic Radiotracers. J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 60 (5), 577–584. 10.2967/jnumed.118.223537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ehlerding E. B.; Ferreira C. A.; Aluicio-Sarduy E.; Jiang D.; Lee H. J.; Theuer C. P.; Engle J. W.; Cai W. 86/90Y-Based Theranostics Targeting Angiogenesis in a Murine Breast Cancer Model. Mol. Pharmaceutics 2018, 15 (7), 2606–2613. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baum R. P.; Kulkarni H. R. THERANOSTICS: From Molecular Imaging Using Ga-68 Labeled Tracers and PET/CT to Personalized Radionuclide Therapy - The Bad Berka Experience. Theranostics 2012, 2 (5), 437–447. 10.7150/thno.3645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lezaic L.; Erba P. A.; Decristoforo C.; Zaletel K.; Mikolajczak R.; Maecke H.; Maina T.; Konijnenberg M.; Kolenc P.; Trofimiuk-Müldner M.; Przybylik-Mazurek E.; Virgolini I.; de Jong M.; Fröberg A. C.; Rangger C.; Di Santo G.; Skorkiewicz K.; Garnuszek P.; Solnica B.; Nock B. A.; Fedak D.; Gaweda P.; Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A. [111In]In-CP04 as a Novel Cholecystokinin-2 Receptor Ligand with Theranostic Potential in Patients with Progressive or Metastatic Medullary Thyroid Cancer: Final Results of a GRAN-T-MTC Phase I Clinical Trial. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2023, 50 (3), 892–907. 10.1007/s00259-022-05992-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A.; Decristoforo C.; Erba P.; Mikolajczak R.; Maecke H.; Zaletel K.; Kolenc P.; Maina T.; Garnuszek P.; Virgollini I.; Geobel G.; Konijnenberg M.; Hendriks-deJong M.; Froberg L.; Lenda-Tracz W.; Rangger C.; Kunzmann A.; Sowa-Staszczak A.; Trofimiuk-Müldner M.; Tulik M.. 111In-CP04 - A Novel CCK2/Gastrin Receptor-Localizing Radiolabelled Peptide Probe for Management of Patients with Progressive/Metastatic Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma (MTC): Rationale, Study Design and the Initial Promising Results of a Multicentre First Phase Study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2015, 42, S221. [Google Scholar]
- Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A.; Erba P.; Decristoforo C.; Zaletel K.; Mikolajczak R.; Maecke H.; Maina-Nock T.; Konijnenberg M.; Kolenc-Peitl P.; Trofimiuk-Muldner M.; Przybylik-Mazurek E.; Virgolini I.; Pawlak D.; De J. M.; Froberg A. C.; Rangger C.; Goebel G.; Scarpa L.; Skorkiewicz K.; Lezaic L.; Garnuszek P.; Sowa-Staszczak A.; Nock B. A.; Bergant D.; Rep S.; Glowa B. Theranostic Management of Medullary Thyroid Cancer (MTC) with (111In/177Lu) CP04: How Close Are We to a Clinical Solution?. Endocrine Abstracts 2017, 49, EP1445. 10.1530/endoabs.49.EP1445. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Maina T.; Konijnenberg M. W.; KolencPeitl P.; Garnuszek P.; Nock B. A.; Kaloudi A.; Kroselj M.; Zaletel K.; Maecke H.; Mansi R.; Erba P.; von Guggenberg E.; Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A.; Mikolajczak R.; Decristoforo C. Preclinical Pharmacokinetics, Biodistribution, Radiation Dosimetry and Toxicity Studies Required for Regulatory Approval of a Phase I Clinical Trial with 111In-CP04 in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Patients. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2016, 91, 236–242. 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- von Guggenberg E.; Kolenc P.; Rottenburger C.; Mikołajczak R.; Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A. Update on Preclinical Development and Clinical Translation of Cholecystokinin-2 Receptor Targeting Radiopharmaceuticals. Cancers 2021, 13 (22), 5776. 10.3390/cancers13225776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merola E.; Grana C. M. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT): Innovations and Improvements. Cancers (Basel) 2023, 15 (11), 2975. 10.3390/cancers15112975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hennrich U.; Kopka K. Lutathera®: The First FDA- and EMA-Approved Radiopharmaceutical for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2019, 12 (3), 114. 10.3390/ph12030114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim K.; Kim S.-J. Lu-177-Based Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2018, 52 (3), 208–215. 10.1007/s13139-017-0505-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paganelli G.; Sansovini M.; Ambrosetti A.; Severi S.; Monti M.; Scarpi E.; Donati C.; Ianniello A.; Matteucci F.; Amadori D. 177 Lu-Dota-Octreotate Radionuclide Therapy of Advanced Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results from a Phase II Study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2014, 41 (10), 1845–1851. 10.1007/s00259-014-2735-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Werner R. A.; Bluemel C.; Allen-Auerbach M. S.; Higuchi T.; Herrmann K. 68Gallium- and 90Yttrium-/177Lutetium: “Theranostic Twins” for Diagnosis and Treatment of NETs. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2015, 29, 1–7. 10.1007/s12149-014-0898-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Demirci E.; Alan Selçuk N.; Beydaǧı G.; Ocak M.; Toklu T.; Akçay K.; Kabasakal L. Initial Findings on the Use of [225Ac]Ac-DOTATATE Therapy as a Theranostic Application in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors. Mol. Imaging Radionucl Ther 2023, 32 (3), 226–232. 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2023.38258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yadav M. P.; Ballal S.; Sahoo R. K.; Bal C. Efficacy and Safety of 225Ac-DOTATATE Targeted Alpha Therapy in Metastatic Paragangliomas: A Pilot Study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2022, 49 (5), 1595–1606. 10.1007/s00259-021-05632-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uccelli L.; Boschi A.; Cittanti C.; Martini P.; Panareo S.; Tonini E.; Nieri A.; Urso L.; Caracciolo M.; Lodi L.; Carnevale A.; Giganti M.; Bartolomei M. 90Y/177Lu-DOTATOC: From Preclinical Studies to Application in Humans. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13 (9), 1463. 10.3390/pharmaceutics13091463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langbein T.; Weber W. A.; Eiber M. Future of Theranostics: An Outlook on Precision Oncology in Nuclear Medicine. J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 60, 13S–19S. 10.2967/jnumed.118.220566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FDA Approves New 68Ga Kit for Prostate Cancer PET. J. Nucl. Med. 202263 ( (2), ), 26N. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krȩcisz P.; Czarnecka K.; Królicki L.; Mikiciuk-Olasik E.; Szymański P. Radiolabeled Peptides and Antibodies in Medicine. Bioconjugate Chem. 2021, 32 (1), 25–42. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



