Table 2.

Effect sizes of axial length - a review of studies and meta-analysis

Study ID	RLRL		SVS		Estimated		BF10	Weightage (%)
	n	Mean±SD	n	Mean±SD	Mean	95% CI lower-upper
Effect sizes per study for AL
Mori K et al. Japan 2021[26]	45	0.73±0.03	46	0.76±0.03	0.659±0.184	0.299–1.023	140.066	72.22
Torri H et al. Japan 2022[27]	19	24.58±0.61	16	24.59±0.75				27.78
Effect sizes per study for SER
Mori K et al. Japan 2021[26]	45	1.42±0.11	46	1.53±0.11	0.669±0.188	0.303–1.036	164.308	72.22
Torri H et al. Japan 2022[27]	19	2.53±0.99	16	2.57±0.88				27.78
Effect sizes per study for VA
Mori K et al. Japan 2021[26]	45	1.42±0.11	46	1.53±0.11	0.082±0.171	−0.262–0.423	0.214	72.22
Torri H et al. Japan 2022[27]	19	2.53±0.99	16	2.57±0.88				27.78

SER: Spherical equivalent refraction, VA: Visual acuity, AL: Axial length, RLRL: Repeated low-level red light, SD: Standard deviation, BF: Bayes factor, CI: Confidence interval, SVS: Single-vision spectacles