Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 24;21:E82. doi: 10.5888/pcd21.240187

Table 2. Associations Between Dietary Variables and Self-Concept at Baseline (2017–2018) and Mental Health at 1-Year Follow-Up (2018–2019) Among 13,887 Adolescents Participating in the COMPASS Study, Canadaa .

Variable Unadjusted model Adjusted modelb Sensitivity analyses
Model 1c Model 2d
Depressive symptoms
Exposure of interest
  Consumption of vegetables and fruite −0.24 (−0.29 to −0.19)f 0.03 (−0.02 to 0.07) 0.03 (−0.01 to 0.07) 0.03 (−0.01 to 0.07)
  SSB composite indexg 0.17 (0.14 to 0.20)f 0.04 (0.01 to 0.06)f 0.04 (0.01 to 0.06)f 0.04 (0.01 to 0.06)f
Positive exposure control
  Self-concepth 0.68 (0.66 to 0.70)f 0.19 (0.17 to 0.22)f 0.19 (0.16 to 0.21)f 0.19 (0.16 to 0.21)f
Anxiety symptoms
Exposure of interest
  Consumption of vegetables and fruite −0.12 (−0.17 to −0.07)f 0.03 (−0.01 to 0.07) 0.03 (0 to 0.07) 0.04 (0 to 0.07)
  SSB composite indexg 0.15 (0.12 to 0.17)f 0.02 (0 to 0.05)f 0.02 (0 to 0.05)f 0.02 (0 to 0.05)f
Positive exposure control
  Self-concepth 0.53 (0.52 to 0.55)f 0.12 (0.10 to 0.15)f 0.12 (0.10 to 0.14)f 0.12 (0.10 to 0.14)f
Psychological well-being
Exposure of interest
  Consumption of vegetables and fruite 0.45 (0.41 to 0.50)f 0.06 (0.03 to 0.10)f 0.06 (0.02 to 0.10)f 0.06 (0.02 to 0.10)f
  SSB composite indexg −0.11 (−0.14 to −0.08)f −0.03 (−0.05 to −0.01)f −0.03 (−0.05 to −0.01)f −0.03 (−0.05 to −0.01)f
Positive exposure control
  Self-concepth −0.70 (−0.71 to −0.68)f −0.21 (−0.23 to −0.18)f −0.21 (−0.23 to −0.18)f −0.20 (−0.23 to −0.18)f

Abbreviations: COMPASS, Cannabis, Obesity, Mental health, Physical activity, Alcohol, Smoking, and Sedentary behavior; SSB, sugar-sweetened beverage.

a

Data were from the COMPASS study, which annually collects survey data from approximately 60,000 students in grades 9 through 12 (aged 13–18 y) in secondary schools in British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario, and Secondary I–V students (aged 12–17 y) in Quebec, Canada (9). All values are β (95% CI); βs are the unstandardized β-coefficients from the linear mixed-effects models.

b

Adjusted models were adjusted for depressive and anxiety symptoms or psychological well-being at baseline (as appropriate), weekly spending money, age, sex, breakfast skipping, weight loss attempts, physical activity, screen time, sleep, smoking cigarettes and e-cigarettes, binge-drinking, cannabis use, supportive social relationships, and happy family life.

c

Additionally adjusted for self-perceived weight status.

d

Additionally adjusted for race and ethnicity, geographic location, and academic achievement.

e

Participants reported the number of servings of vegetables and fruit they consumed the day before the survey.

f

Estimates in which 95% CIs do not include 0.

g

Responses for these 3 categories of SSBs were summed to derive a composite SSB index, ranging from 0 (did not consume any SSBs in the 3 categories) to 21 (consumed SSBs from all 3 categories every day during a usual week) (13).

h

Self-concept was measured by the Self-Description Questionnaire II (14). Participants were asked to rate 5 statements on a 5-point Likert scale (1 corresponding to true and 5 to false): “in general, I like the way I am”; “overall, I have a lot to be proud of”; “a lot of things about me are good”; “when I do something, I do it well”; and “I like the way I look.” Responses were summed; score ranges from 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating poorer self-concept.