Radiology |
Zhu et al., 2024 (Int J Surg) [28] |
Strong in interpreting radiological images, handles large image–text datasets. |
Limited medical domain expertise; potential for misinterpretation of complex cases. |
Mental health |
Elyoseph et al., 2024 (JMIR Ment Health) [29] |
Effective at recognizing emotions from visual and textual data, helpful in mental health applications. |
Potential for biases in emotion recognition and difficulty with more nuanced emotional contexts. |
Neuroimaging |
Biessmann et al., 2011 (IEEE Rev Biomed Eng) [30] |
Robust integration of different neuroimaging modalities; enhances understanding of brain function. |
Requires significant computational resources and expertise; challenges with data standardization. |
Radiology |
Brin et al., 2024 (Eur Radiol) [31] |
Accurate interpretation of radiological images, effective across diverse clinical cases. |
Performance varies with image complexity; potential for hallucination of results in complex imaging cases. |
Ophthalmology |
Sorin et al., 2024 (MedRxiv) [36] |
Analysis of external ocular images with or without clinical context. |
Performance was inferior to non-ophthalmologist physicians, and was only evaluated based on external images versus OCT or fundoscopy. |
Pulmonary |
Cahan et al., 2023 (Sci Rep) [32] |
Improves mortality prediction by fusing clinical and imaging data, supports personalized treatment planning. |
Model complexity and interpretability challenges; requires large, high-quality datasets. |
Biomedicine |
Acosta et al., 2022 (Nat Med) [33] |
Integrates diverse medical data (imaging, clinical) for diagnostics, facilitates personalized care. |
High dependency on comprehensive, high-quality datasets; concerns about generalizability in clinical practice. |
Virtual reality in healthcare |
Kouijzer et al., 2023 (Implement Sci Commun) [34] |
Enhances patient engagement, effective for rehabilitation and training. |
Implementation challenges, especially in integrating VR with existing healthcare systems. |
Neurology |
Ramanarayanan, 2024 (J Speech Lang Hear Res) [35] |
Effective for remote monitoring and assessments, supports telehealth initiatives. |
Privacy concerns and limited accuracy for certain complex conditions. |
Immunology |
Indolfi et al., 2024 (Front Med) [37] |
Supports continuity of care from childhood to adulthood, personalized treatment recommendations. |
Limited data on long-term outcomes; potential for biases in decision making. |
Operations and patient management |
Zhu et al., 2022 (Front Surg) [38] |
Improves operational efficiency, integrates multimodal ID technology for patient and material management. |
Complex integration with existing hospital systems; steep learning curve for users. |
Radiology |
Mohsen et al., 2022 (Sci Rep) [40] |
Effective in combining EHR and imaging data for enhanced decision making, predictive analytics capabilities. |
Requires high-quality, standardized datasets; concerns about patient privacy and data security. |
Oncology |
Lipkova et al., 2022 (Cancer Cell) [41] |
Enables comprehensive analysis of multimodal cancer data (genomics, imaging), supports precision oncology. |
Computationally expensive; challenges in scaling for real-time clinical applications. |
Oncology/genomics |
Shao et al., 2023 (Semin Cancer Biol) [42] |
Enhances precision in predicting gene mutations through multimodal integration of genomics and clinical data. |
Model complexity may hinder clinical interpretability; requires extensive training datasets. |
Mental health |
Alhuwaydi, 2024 (Risk Manag Healthc Policy) [43] |
Improves accessibility to mental healthcare, supports early diagnosis and intervention through multimodal data. |
Ethical concerns, potential biases in AI-driven mental health interventions, and lack of human empathy. |
Mental health |
Ettman & Galea, 2023 (JMIR Ment Health) [48] |
Enhances population mental health monitoring, addresses large-scale public health issues with AI interventions. |
Risks of widening socioeconomic disparities through AI implementation; data privacy concerns. |