Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 10;24(20):6532. doi: 10.3390/s24206532

Table 4.

Comparison of Oura, Fitbit, and Apple Watch to PSG with respect to sleep/wake and sleep stages.

Oura
n = 35
Mean (SD)
PSG
n = 35
Mean (SD)
Fitbit
n = 33
Mean (SD)
PSG
n = 33
Mean (SD)
Apple Watch
n = 29
Mean (SD)
PSG
n = 29
Mean (SD)
Total Sleep Time (min) 421 (34) 430 (41) 428 (23) 431 (40) 442 (35) 434 (40)
Wake (min) 59 (34) 50 (41) 49 (26) 49 (40) 39 (35) * 46 (40)
Light Sleep (min) 233 (28) 239 (41) 258 (37) * 240 (41) 289 (24) * 244 (38)
Deep Sleep (min) 95 (21) 95 (35) 79 (27) * 94 (36) 51 (18) * 94 (38)
REM (min) 93 (25) 96 (21) 90 (28) 97 (21) 102 (22) 96 (21)
Sleep Latency (min) 18 (25) * 13 (22) 13 (21) 13 (22) 17 (26) 15 (23)
WASO (min) 42 (26) 38 (37) 40 (15) 36 (35) 22 (23) * 32 (33)
Sleep Efficiency (%) 88% (7%) 90% (9%) 89% (5%) 90% (8%) 92% (7%) 90% (8%)

Notes. Missing data were reassigned as wake (see section on wake interpolation). Sample size for sleep latency n = 34 for PSG vs. Oura, n = 32 for PSG vs. Fitbit, and n = 29 for PSG vs. Apple Watch. * Indicates significant difference between the device and PSG using paired t-tests.