Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 6;84(10):1299–1311. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-02074-9

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of the study eye (ITT analysis set)

Study eye FE implant (N = 385) SE implant (N = 380) Sham/timolol (N = 385) p-valuea
FE implant vs sham/timolol
p-valuea
SE implant vs sham/timolol
Diagnosis, n (%) 0.8445 0.3985
 Open-angle glaucoma 324 (84.2) 309 (81.3) 322 (83.6)
 Ocular hypertension 61 (15.8) 71 (18.7) 63 (16.4)
Number of IOP-lowering medications used at screening, n (%) 0.6221 0.0992
 0 114 (29.6) 126 (33.2) 100 (26.0)
 1 188 (48.8) 166 (43.7) 200 (51.9)
 2 75 (19.5) 78 (20.5) 74 (19.2)
 3b 8 (2.1) 10 (2.6) 11 (2.9)
Number of IOP-lowering medications used at screening
 Mean (SD) 0.9 (0.8) 0.9 (0.8) 1.0 (0.8)
Screening IOP (mmHg)
 Mean (SD) 20.24 (4.65) 20.33 (4.70) 20.06 (4.45) 0.5986 0.4159
Baseline mean diurnal IOP
 Mean (SD) 24.28 (2.99) 24.05 (2.81) 24.22 (2.84) 0.8010 0.4080
Baseline mean diurnal IOP category n (%) 0.9372 0.4922
 ≤  25 mmHg 270 (70.1) 276 (72.6) 271 (70.4)
 >  25 mmHg 115 (29.9) 104 (27.4) 114 (29.6)
Baseline IOP at 8AM
 Mean (SD) 24.72 (3.70) 24.46 (3.35) 24.73 (3.60) 0.9685 0.2843
Iris color, n (%) 0.4238 0.7543
 Blue 97 (25.2) 89 (23.4) 106 (27.5)
 Brown 211 (54.8) 222 (58.4) 216 (56.1)
 Green 13 (3.4) 16 (4.2) 16 (4.2)
 Hazel 61 (15.8) 52 (13.7) 46 (11.9)
 Other 3 (0.8) 1 (0.3) 1 (0.3)

FE implant fast-eluting travoprost intracameral implant, IOP intraocular pressure, ITT intent-to-treat, SD standard deviation, SE implant slow-eluting travoprost intracameral implant

ap-value based on two-sample t-test for continuous variables or Pearson chi-squared test for categorical variables

bSubjects with three IOP-lowering medications used at screening were consented under an early protocol version in which subjects were allowed to have up to three IOP-lowering medications