Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD008354. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008354.pub2

Macdonald 2011.

Methods Study type: interventional 
 Study design: randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, Phase III study 
 Sequence generation: an interactive web response system
Allocation: an interactive web response system
Blinding: clinical and imaging data were assessed by a masked assessor
Incomplete outcome data addressed: reported the number and reason
Free of selective outcome reporting: unclear
Free of other bias: this trials was funded by Actelion Pharmaceuticals 
 Duration of study: 12 weeks
Participants Ages eligible for study: 18 to 75 years 
 Genders eligible for study: both 
 Total number of participants: 1157 
 Location: 102 sites in 27 countries 
 Inclusion criteria: patients had SAH due to ruptured saccular aneurysm secured by surgical clipping. Eligible patients had a diffuse clot (long axis ≥ 20 mm or present in both hemispheres) on admission CT scan and a WFNS grade I to IV SAH before the securing procedure 
 Exclusion criteria: individuals with SAH due to non‐aneurysmal causes, intraventricular or intracerebral hemorrhage without subarachnoid blood, angiographic vasospasm on admission angiography or major complications during the securing procedure were excluded
Interventions Treatment group: 5 mg/hour clazosentan
Control group: placebo
Outcomes Primary outcome measures: all‐cause mortality and vasospasm‐related morbidity within 6 weeks of aSAH, as defined by at least 1 of the following events: death; vasospasm‐related cerebral infarction; DIND due to vasospasm or neurological signs or symptoms, in the presence of a positive angiogram, leading to rescue therapy 
 Secondary outcome measures: the GOSE score dichotomized as good or poor outcome at week 12 was the main secondary end point. The other secondary end points were the occurrence of the individual components of the composite primary end point and total volume of new or worsened cerebral infarcts of all causes at week 6 after aSAH
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk An interactive web response system
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk An interactive web response system
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Clinical and imaging data were assessed by a masked assessor
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Reported the number and reason
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk There was not enough information to permit judgment of the other potential sources of bias
Other bias Unclear risk Funded by Actelion Pharmaceuticals