Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

Summary of findings 6. Fluoxetine compared to bupropion.

Fluoxetine compared to bupropion
Patient or population: patients with depression
 Settings: in‐ and outpatients
 Intervention: fluoxetine
 Comparison: bupropion
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of Participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Bupropion Fluoxetine
Failure to respond
(reduction ≥ 50% on HDRS)
493 per 1000 447 per 1000 
 (318 to 582) OR 0.83 
 (0.48 to 1.43) 436
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1  
Endpoint score
(HDRS or MADRS)
  The mean endpoint score in the intervention groups was
 0 standard deviations higher 
 (0 to 0 higher)   0 (0)   No data available on this outcome
Failure to complete ‐ total ‐ 356 per 1000 356 per 1000 
 (270 to 450) OR 1.00 
 (0.67 to 1.48) 436
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1  
Failure to complete ‐ inefficacy ‐ 23 per 1000 0 per 1000 
 (0 to 87) OR 1.16 
 (0.33 to 4.10) 436
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1  
Failure to complete ‐ side effects ‐ 59 per 1000 60 per 1000 
 (28 to 124) OR 1.01 
 (0.45 to 2.25) 436
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1  
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio;
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Limitations in studies designs: no details on randomisation procedures and allocation concealment. Blinding stated but not tested.