Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

Comparison 5. Fluoxetine versus MAOIs or newer ADs.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Failure to respond ‐ HDRS (‐50%) 16   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Fluoxetine vs Agomelatine 1 515 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.44 [0.99, 2.09]
1.2 Fluoxetine vs Mirtazapine 4 600 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.46 [1.04, 2.04]
1.3 Fluoxetine vs Moclobemide 7 721 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.27 [0.92, 1.75]
1.4 Fluoxetine vs Phenelzine 1 40 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.42 [0.27, 7.34]
1.5 Fluoxetine vs Reboxetine 3 721 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.77 [0.55, 1.10]
2 End‐point score on rating scales 13   Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Fluoxetine vs Agomelatine 3 1213 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.02 [‐0.18, 0.23]
2.2 Fluoxetine vs Mirtazapine 1 31 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.57 [‐0.15, 1.29]
2.3 Fluoxetine vs Moclobemide 6 540 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.13 [‐0.04, 0.30]
2.4 Fluoxetine vs Phenelzine 1 40 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.05 [‐0.67, 0.57]
2.5 Fluoxetine vs Reboxetine 2 205 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.04 [‐0.31, 0.40]
3 Failure to complete ‐ Total 17   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Fluoxetine vs Agomelatine 2 785 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.22 [0.59, 2.49]
3.2 Fluoxetine vs Mirtazapine 3 301 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.51, 1.68]
3.3 Fluoxetine vs Moclobemide 7 721 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.70, 1.47]
3.4 Fluoxetine vs Phenelzine 1 40 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.18 [0.01, 4.01]
3.5 Fluoxetine vs Reboxetine 4 764 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.60 [0.44, 0.83]
4 Failure to complete ‐ Inefficacy 16   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 Fluoxetine vs Agomelatine 2 785 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.08 [0.41, 2.88]
4.2 Fluoxetine vs Mirtazapine 4 600 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.45 [0.71, 2.96]
4.3 Fluoxetine vs Moclobemide 6 679 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.70 [0.32, 1.56]
4.4 Fluoxetine vs Phenelzine 1 40 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4.5 Fluoxetine vs Reboxetine 3 464 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.47, 1.77]
5 Failure to complete ‐ Side Effects 16   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
5.1 Fluoxetine vs Agomelatine 2 785 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.50 [0.73, 3.08]
5.2 Fluoxetine vs Mirtazapine 4 600 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.95 [0.54, 1.66]
5.3 Fluoxetine vs Moclobemide 7 721 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.54, 2.01]
5.4 Fluoxetine vs Phenelzine 1 40 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.32 [0.01, 8.26]
5.5 Fluoxetine vs Reboxetine 2 211 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.40 [0.10, 1.61]