1 Failure to respond ‐ HDRS (‐50%) |
16 |
|
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
Subtotals only |
1.1 Fluoxetine vs Agomelatine |
1 |
515 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
1.44 [0.99, 2.09] |
1.2 Fluoxetine vs Mirtazapine |
4 |
600 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
1.46 [1.04, 2.04] |
1.3 Fluoxetine vs Moclobemide |
7 |
721 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
1.27 [0.92, 1.75] |
1.4 Fluoxetine vs Phenelzine |
1 |
40 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
1.42 [0.27, 7.34] |
1.5 Fluoxetine vs Reboxetine |
3 |
721 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
0.77 [0.55, 1.10] |
2 End‐point score on rating scales |
13 |
|
Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) |
Subtotals only |
2.1 Fluoxetine vs Agomelatine |
3 |
1213 |
Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) |
0.02 [‐0.18, 0.23] |
2.2 Fluoxetine vs Mirtazapine |
1 |
31 |
Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) |
0.57 [‐0.15, 1.29] |
2.3 Fluoxetine vs Moclobemide |
6 |
540 |
Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) |
0.13 [‐0.04, 0.30] |
2.4 Fluoxetine vs Phenelzine |
1 |
40 |
Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) |
‐0.05 [‐0.67, 0.57] |
2.5 Fluoxetine vs Reboxetine |
2 |
205 |
Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) |
0.04 [‐0.31, 0.40] |
3 Failure to complete ‐ Total |
17 |
|
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
Subtotals only |
3.1 Fluoxetine vs Agomelatine |
2 |
785 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
1.22 [0.59, 2.49] |
3.2 Fluoxetine vs Mirtazapine |
3 |
301 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
0.92 [0.51, 1.68] |
3.3 Fluoxetine vs Moclobemide |
7 |
721 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
1.01 [0.70, 1.47] |
3.4 Fluoxetine vs Phenelzine |
1 |
40 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
0.18 [0.01, 4.01] |
3.5 Fluoxetine vs Reboxetine |
4 |
764 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
0.60 [0.44, 0.83] |
4 Failure to complete ‐ Inefficacy |
16 |
|
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
Subtotals only |
4.1 Fluoxetine vs Agomelatine |
2 |
785 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
1.08 [0.41, 2.88] |
4.2 Fluoxetine vs Mirtazapine |
4 |
600 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
1.45 [0.71, 2.96] |
4.3 Fluoxetine vs Moclobemide |
6 |
679 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
0.70 [0.32, 1.56] |
4.4 Fluoxetine vs Phenelzine |
1 |
40 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |
4.5 Fluoxetine vs Reboxetine |
3 |
464 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
0.92 [0.47, 1.77] |
5 Failure to complete ‐ Side Effects |
16 |
|
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
Subtotals only |
5.1 Fluoxetine vs Agomelatine |
2 |
785 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
1.50 [0.73, 3.08] |
5.2 Fluoxetine vs Mirtazapine |
4 |
600 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
0.95 [0.54, 1.66] |
5.3 Fluoxetine vs Moclobemide |
7 |
721 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
1.04 [0.54, 2.01] |
5.4 Fluoxetine vs Phenelzine |
1 |
40 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
0.32 [0.01, 8.26] |
5.5 Fluoxetine vs Reboxetine |
2 |
211 |
Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) |
0.40 [0.10, 1.61] |