Comparison 11. Subgroup analysis for fluoxetine versus TCAs: failure to complete ‐ inefficacy.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 follow‐up <6 weeks	5	401	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.49 [0.16, 1.50]
1.1 Fluoxetine vs Amitriptyline	2	105	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.38 [0.07, 2.09]
1.2 Fluoxetine vs Doxepine	1	51	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.3 Fluoxetine vs Imipramine	1	40	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	3.15 [0.12, 82.16]
1.4 Fluoxetine vs Nortriptyiline	1	205	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.38 [0.07, 2.03]
2 follow‐up 6‐16 weeks	28	2510	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.38 [1.02, 1.87]
2.1 Fluoxetine vs Amitriptyline	11	730	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.11 [0.50, 2.47]
2.2 Fluoxetine vs Clomipramine	1	120	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	7.37 [0.37, 145.75]
2.3 Fluoxetine vs Desipramine	2	104	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.03 [0.20, 5.35]
2.4 Fluoxetine vs Dothiepin/dosulepin	3	271	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.34 [0.49, 3.66]
2.5 Fluoxetine vs Doxepine	2	232	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.72 [0.60, 4.92]
2.6 Fluoxetine vs Imipramine	9	1053	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.40 [0.96, 2.04]