Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

Comparison 19. Subgroup analysis for fluoxetine versus other SSRIs: failure to complete ‐ total.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 follow‐up <6 weeks 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Fluoxetine vs Citalopram 1 59 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.22, 4.27]
2 follow‐up 6‐16 weeks 21   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Fluoxetine vs Citalopram 2 673 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.87 [0.59, 1.27]
2.2 Fluoxetine vs Fluvoxamine 2 284 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.36, 1.37]
2.3 Fluoxetine vs Paroxetine 9 1606 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.81, 1.25]
2.4 Fluoxetine vs Sertraline 7 1111 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.12 [0.85, 1.48]
2.5 Fluoxetine vs Escitalopram 2 578 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.53 [1.00, 2.37]
3 follow‐up >16 weeks 3   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Fluoxetine vs Paroxetine 1 242 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.53, 1.49]
3.2 Fluoxetine vs Sertraline 2 480 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.33 [0.84, 2.09]