Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

Comparison 20. Subgroup analysis for fluoxetine versus other SSRIs: failure to complete ‐ inefficacy.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 follow‐up <6 weeks 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Fluoxetine vs Citalopram 1 59 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.47 [0.04, 5.43]
2 follow‐up >16 weeks 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Fluoxetine vs Sertraline 1 238 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.47, 2.07]
3 follow‐up 6‐16 weeks 11   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Fluoxetine vs Citalopram 2 673 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.49, 1.65]
3.2 Fluoxetine vs Paroxetine 4 1005 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.41, 1.39]
3.3 Fluoxetine vs Sertraline 4 818 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.18 [0.61, 2.29]
3.4 Fluoxetine vs Escitalopram 2 578 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.74 [0.46, 6.53]