Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

Comparison 24. Subgroup analysis for fluoxetine versus MAOIs or newer ADs: failure to complete ‐ total.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 follow‐up <6 weeks 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Fluoxetine vs Moclobemide 1 70 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.31, 2.76]
2 follow‐up 6‐16 weeks 15   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Fluoxetina vs Agomelatine 2 785 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.22 [0.59, 2.49]
2.2 Fluoxetine vs Mirtazapine 3 301 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.51, 1.68]
2.3 Fluoxetine vs Moclobemide 6 651 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.02 [0.68, 1.53]
2.4 Fluoxetine vs Reboxetine 4 764 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.60 [0.44, 0.83]