Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

Ansseau 1994.

Methods Six‐week double‐blind, randomised multicentre study
Participants Outpatients fulfilling DSM‐III‐R criteria for major depressive episode, with a score of at least 25 on Montgomery and Asberg Scale for Depression (MADRS) and of at least 4 on Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI).
 Age range: 19‐68 years
 Exclusion criteria: serious or uncontrolled medical illness, major anxiety, agitation, suicide risk, resistance during the current episode to at least two antidepressants, substance abuse or dependence, concomitant therapy with lithium, MAOIs, long‐acting neuroleptic.
Interventions Fluoxetine: 93 participants
 Milnacipram: 97 participants
 Fluoxetine dose: 20 mg/day
 Milnacipram dose: 100 mg/day
Outcomes Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression‐24 item (HDRS‐24), MADRS, CGI
Notes Funding: by industry
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "randomly assigned". No further information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "double blind", no further information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "double blind", no further information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "double blind", no further information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Number and reasons for drop‐out reported. Rating scale scores reported without denominator
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Endpoint scores reported only in figures. Side effects reported
Other bias High risk Last author's affiliation was Laboratories Pierre Fabre Medicament, and this company produces milnacipran