Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

Costa e Silva 1998.

Methods Eight‐week double‐blind, randomised, multicentre study
Participants Outpatients fulfilling DSM‐III‐R criteria for major depression, with a score of at least 20 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression‐21 item (HDRS‐21) and depressive symptoms for at least 1 month before study entry.
 Age range: 18‐60 years
 Exclusion criteria: pregnancy, absence of methods of contraception, known sensitivity to fluoxetine or venlafaxine, history of significant cardiac, renal or hepatic disease, clinically significant abnormalities on a screening examination, ECG, laboratory tests, acute suicide tendency, seizures, history or presence of any psychotic disorder not associated with depression, drug or alcohol dependence within the past year, psychotherapy, use of fluoxetine, antipsychotic drugs, ECT, MAOI within the past 14 days, any other antidepressant, anxiolitics, sedative‐hypnotic drugs (but zopiclone) within 7 days before baseline.
Interventions Fluoxetine: 186 participants
 Venlafaxine: 196 participants
 Fluoxetine dose range: 20‐40 mg/day
 Venlafaxine dose range: 75‐125 mg/day
Outcomes Primary outcomes: HDRS‐21, Montgomery and Asberg Scale for Depression (MADRS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and Improvement
Notes Response: decrease of at least 50% in the HDRS or in the MADRS; or a CGI‐I score of 1 or 2
 Funding: by industry
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised, no further information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no other information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no other information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear if raters were independent and unclear if blinding was successful
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Rating scale scores reported without denominator
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Mean scores reported without standard deviations. Side effects reported only if they occurred at least in 5% of the patients
Other bias High risk Quote: "supported by a grant from Wyeth‐AYerst International". This company produces venlafaxine