Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

Fawcett 1989.

Methods Six‐week randomised, double‐blind study
Participants Outpatients fulfilling DSM‐III criteria for unipolar major depression, with a score of at least 20 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression‐21 item (HDRS‐21).
 Mean age: 39.9 in the fluoxetine group, 44.5 in the amitriptyline one
 Exclusion criteria: significant medical illness, concomitant medication with any potential psychiatric side effect, psychotic features, any other DSM‐III Axis I diagnosis other than unipolar major depression.
Interventions Fluoxetine: 20 participants
 Amitriptyline: 20 participants
 Fluoxetine dose range: 20‐60 mg/day
 Amitriptyline dose range: 50‐200 mg/day
Outcomes HDRS‐21, Clinical Global Impression for Severity and Improvement (CGI S‐I), Patient Global Impression (PGI)
Notes Improvement: a decrease of at least 50% on the total HDRS‐21 score
 Funding: by industry
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "(patients) were randomly assigned to fluoxetine treatment", no further information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind, no further information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind, no further information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind, no further information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Mean endpoint scores reported without denominators. Adverse events not clearly reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Mean endpoint scores and standard deviations reported (HDRS, CGI)
Other bias High risk Supported by Eli Lilly, and this company produces fluoxetine