Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

Gattaz 1995.

Methods Four‐week randomised, double‐blind, two‐centre study
Participants Inpatients fulfilling DSM‐III‐R criteria for major depression, with a score of at least 18 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression‐17 item (HDRS‐17).
 Age range: 18‐65 years
 Exclusion criteria: serious allergies, drug and alcohol abuse, resistance to a previous treatment with an antidepressant prescribed at an effective dosage during at least 3 weeks, and therapy with MAOI in the last 14 days, or with fluoxetine in the last 5 weeks.
Interventions Fluoxetine: 34 participants
 Moclobemide: 36 participants
 Fluoxetine dose range: 20‐40 mg/day
 Moclobemide dose range: 300‐600 mg/day
 Chloral hydrate and low dose of diazepam as hypnotic or/and anxiolytic were allowed
Outcomes HDRS‐17, Clinical Global Impression (CGI)
Notes Response: decrease of at least 50% in the HDRS‐17 total
 Funding: unclear
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised, no further information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no other information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double dummy, no other information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no other information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Scores reported without denominators. Response rate was based on patients completed the trials and not on randomised patients
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Number and reasons for dropouts reported. Endpoint scores at CGI not reported. Side effects reported
Other bias Unclear risk Funding: unclear