Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

Goldstein 2002.

Methods Eight‐week randomised, double‐blind, multicentre study
Participants Outpatients fulfilling DSM‐IV criteria for non‐psychotic major depressive disorder, with a score of at least 15 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression‐17 item (HDRS‐17) and at least 4 on the Clinical Global Impression‐Severity of Illness (CGI).
 Age range: 18‐65 years
 Exclusion criteria: any primary DSM‐IV Axis I diagnosis other than major depressive disorder or any anxiety disorder as a primary diagnosis within the past year with the exception of specific phobias, history of substance abuse or dependence within the past year or a positive urine drug screen at study entry, failure of 2 or more adequate courses of antidepressant therapy during the present episode.
Interventions Fluoxetine: 33 participants
 Duloxetine: 70 participants
 Placebo: 70 participants
 Fluoxetine dose: 20 mg/day
 Duloxetine dose range: 40‐120 mg/day
Outcomes Primary outcome: HDRS‐17
 Secondary outcomes: Montgomery and Asberg Scale for Depression (MADRS), CGI, Patient Global Impresion (PGI), Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM‐A)
Notes Funding: by industry
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised, no further information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: " this study used double‐blind placebo lead in such that investigators and patients did not know when randomisation occurred and when active study drug was first administered", no further information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: " this study used double‐blind placebo lead in such that investigators and patients did not know when randomisation occurred and when active study drug was first administered", no further information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: " this study used double‐blind placebo lead in such that investigators and patients did not know when randomisation occurred and when active study drug was first administered", further information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Rating scale scores reported without denominators. Number and reasons for dropout not clearly reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Mean scores reported without standard deviations. Only common treatment emergent adverse events reported
Other bias High risk First author's affiliation was Lilly Corporate Center and this company produces fluoxetine