Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

GSK 29060/356.

Methods Eight‐week, multicentre, randomised, double‐blind study
Participants Patients suffering from a major depressive episode according to DSM‐III‐R, with a baseline score on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression‐17 Item (HDRS‐17) of at least 18, and an HDRS item 10 score of 1 or more.
 Age: 18 years or more
 Exclusion criteria: severe co‐existing disease not stabilised with medication, neurological disorders, DSM‐III diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or psychotic depression, or who met criteria for substance dependence and abuse within the past 6 months, ECT or fluoxetine within 3 months preceding baseline, any investigational drug within 30 days from baseline, MAOIs within 2 weeks preceding baseline, lithium treatment in the past 8 weeks, currently receiving Type 1C antiarrhythmics or oral anticoagulants, patients posing a suicidal risk, pregnant or lactating, hypersensitive to fluoxetine or patients with clinically significant abnormal laboratory values at retest oral screening.
Interventions Fluoxetine: 70 participants
 Paroxetine: 68 participants
 Fluoxetine dose: 20 mg/day
 Paroxetine dose: 20 mg/day
Outcomes Primary outcomes: HDRS and Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM‐A)
Secondary outcomes: Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), including severity and improvement
Notes Funding: unclear
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No information about randomisation procedure
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "double‐blind". No further information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "double‐blind". No further information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk All ITT analyses used last observation carried forward (LOCF) data set. Number and reasons for dropout reported. Mean endpoint scores (HDRS) reported with standard deviations
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Most frequent side effects reported. Number of responders not reported
Other bias Unclear risk Funding: unclear information