Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

Kerkhofs 1990.

Methods Six‐week randomised, double‐blind study
Participants Inpatients fulfilling Research Diagnostic Criteria for major depressive disorder, with a score of at least 17 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS).
 Age range: 18‐64 years
 Exclusion criteria: concurrent medical disorder
Interventions Fluoxetine: 16 participants
 Amitriptyline: 18 participants
 Fluoxetine dose range: 40‐60 mg/day
 Amitriptyline dose range: 100‐150 mg/day
 Only oxazepam (max 100 mg/day) was allowed
Outcomes HDRS, Montgomery and Asberg Scale for Depression (MADRS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and Improvement, Patient Global Impression (PGI)
Notes Funding: by industry
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "randomly allocated, according to predetermined schedule", no further information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind, no further information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind, no further information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind, no further information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Denominator reported for responders was different from the number of randomised patients. Reasons for withdrawal were not reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Adverse events were reported. Mean scores were reported with standard deviations
Other bias High risk Last author's affiliation was Eli Lilly Benelux and this company produces fluoxetine