Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

Loo 1999.

Methods Six‐week randomised, double‐blind, multicentre study
Participants In‐ and outpatients fulfilling ICD‐10 criteria for depressive episode, recurrent depressive disorder, or bipolar affective disorder (depressive), with a score of at least 25 on the Montgomery and Asberg Scale for Depression (MADRS), requiring an antidepressant treatment.
 Age range: 18‐65 years
 Exclusion criteria: severe risk of suicide, acute or chronic psychosis, failure to respond to 2 antidepressants for the current depressive episode, previous history of drug abuse or dependence, severe somatic diseases in evolution, current treatment with barbiturate, buspirone, anti‐epileptic drugs, use of diazepam, lorazepam and alprazolam.
Interventions Fluoxetine: 196 participants
 Tianeptine: 191 participants
 Fluoxetine dose: 20 mg/day
 Tianeptine dose: 37.5 mg/day
Outcomes Primary outcome: MADRS global score
 Secondary outcomes: decrease of at least 50% in MADRS global score (responder patients) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores
Notes Funding: unclear
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised, no further information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no further information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no further information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no further information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Number and reasons for discontinuation reported, but withdrawal was not included in the analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Only serious adverse events reported. End point mean scores reported with standard deviations
Other bias Unclear risk Funding: unclear