Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

Mao 2008.

Methods Eight‐week randomised, parallel group, double‐blind study
Participants In‐ and outpatients fulfilling DSM‐IV criteria for major depressive disorder, with a score of at least 18 on the first 17 items of Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS) and a score of at least 4 on Clinical Global Impression‐Severity (CGI).
Age range: 18‐65 years
 Exclusion criteria: any current primary DSM‐IV axis I diagnosis or any anxiety disorder as a primary diagnosis within the year preceding enrolment, or schizoaffective disorder, a history of substance abuse or dependence within the past year; serious suicidal risk or serious medical illness; currently take St. John's wort or other Chinese herbal medicine for depression were also excluded.
Interventions Fluoxetine: 117 participants
 Escitalopram: 123 participants
 Fluoxetine dose: 10 mg/day
 Escitalopram dose: 20 mg/day
Outcomes Primary outcome: change in HDRS total score
Secondary outcome: change in Montgomery and Asberg Scale for Depression (MADRS) total score
Response: at least 50% decrease from HDRS baseline score
Notes Funding: by industry
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised, no further information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no further information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: " we administered treatments in a double blind fashion using a double‐dummy design", no further information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no further information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Number and reasons for discontinuation clearly reported. Denominator reported for responders was different from the number of randomised patients
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Side effects reported. Secondary endpoint scores (MADRS, CGI) reported
Other bias High risk Quote: "contract grant sponsor: Xian‐Janssen Pharmaceutical Company (honoraria to authors for conducting this trial)". This company produces escitalopram