Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

Masco 1985.

Methods Six‐week randomised, double‐blind study
Participants Outpatients fulfilling DSM‐III‐R criteria for major depressive illness, with a score of at least 20 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression‐17 item (HDRS‐17), a score of at least 8 on the Raskin Depression Scale (RDS) and greater than the Covi Anxiety Scale (CAS) score.
 Mean age: 51 years in both groups
 Exclusion criteria: not stated
Interventions Fluoxetine: 20 participants
 Amitriptyline: 21 participants
 Fluoxetine dose range: 40‐80 mg/day
 Amitriptyline dose range: 150‐300 mg/day
Outcomes HDRS‐17, RDS , CAS, Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Improvement and Severity, Patient Global Impression (PGI)
Notes Funding: by industry
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised, no further information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no further information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "capsules that looked identical were supplied to all patients in two bottles marked 'morning dose' and 'bedtime dose'", no further information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no further information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Number and reasons for early termination reported. Scores reported without denominator
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Adverse events reported. End point scores reported without standard deviation
Other bias High risk Quote: "supported by a grant from Eli Lilly & Company", this company produces fluoxetine