Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3

Peters 1990.

Methods Five‐week randomised, double‐blind study
Participants Outpatients fulfilling ICD 9 criteria for major unipolar or bipolar depression, with a score of at least 17 on the HDRS, a score of at least 8 on the Raskin Depression Scale (RDS), greater than Covi Anxiety Scale (CAS) score.
 Age range: 25‐63 years
 Exclusion criteria: history of psychosis, suicide risk, severe mental diseases, contraindication to amitriptyline, severe organic disease, known drug allergy, use of amitriptyline within 4 weeks of baseline, use of neuroleptics within 2 weeks of study entry.
Interventions Fluoxetine: 51 participants
 Amitriptyline: 51 participants
 Fluoxetine dose: 20 mg/day
 Amitriptyline dose: 100 mg/day
 Chloral hydrate or benzodiazepines for insomnia were allowed
Outcomes Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS‐17), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), RDS, CAS
Notes Funding: unclear
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised, no further information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no further information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no further information
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, no further information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk It was unclear which was the last observation carried forward (LOCF) population
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Three rating scales for depression were listed in methods, but only one was reported
Other bias Unclear risk Funding: unclear